Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Bio efficacy of Selected Systemic and Non Systemic Fungicides invitro and invivo Condition against Banded Leaf and Sheath Blight Disease of Maize caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kühn

Bolla Venkateswarlu; Surja Kanta Beura

4
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Ten fungicides were tested at different concentrations in in vitro and in vivo for the management of banded leaf and sheath blight of maize. Thiophanate methyl 70 WP, difenoconazole 25EC, hexaconazole 5 EC and validamycin 3 SL were screened against Rhizoctonia solani at 10, 15, 20 and 25 ppm concentrations for their anti fungal activity. where, as mancozeb 75WP,chlorothalonil 75 WP, zineb 75WP and captaf 50 WP of the fungus at 100,200, 300 and 400 ppm concentrations, respectively along with control. At10 percent concentration difenoconazole, thiophanate methyl, completely check the radial growth of the fungus. Based on effectiveness of fungicides in vitro, they were further tested under in vivo conditions. carbendazim 50 WP @ 0.1 % applied as seed treatment followed by validamycin 3SLfoliar spray showed lower disease severity, highest grain yield followed by 2750Kg/ha @ 0.2 per cent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Difenoconazole at 10 percent concentration completely checked radial growth of Rhizoctonia solani in vitro.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
difenoconazolee2
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Outcome
radial growthe2
Direction
completely checke2
Qualifier
10 percent concentratione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“management of banded leaf and sheath blight of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–139 · show in text ↑
e1

“were screened against Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–267 · show in text ↑
e2

“At10 percent concentration difenoconazole, thiophanate methyl, completely check the radial growth of the fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiophanate methyl at 10 percent concentration completely checked radial growth of Rhizoctonia solani in vitro.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
thiophanate methyle2
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Outcome
radial growthe2
Direction
completely checke2
Qualifier
10 percent concentratione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“management of banded leaf and sheath blight of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–139 · show in text ↑
e1

“were screened against Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–267 · show in text ↑
e2

“At10 percent concentration difenoconazole, thiophanate methyl, completely check the radial growth of the fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim seed treatment followed by validamycin foliar spray gave lower maize disease severity in vivo.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
carbendazim 50 WP @ 0.1 % applied as seed treatment followed by validamycin 3SLfoliar spraye3
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye3
Direction
lowere3
Setting
in vivo conditionse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“management of banded leaf and sheath blight of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–139 · show in text ↑
e1

“were screened against Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–267 · show in text ↑
e3

“carbendazim 50 WP @ 0.1 % applied as seed treatment followed by validamycin 3SLfoliar spray showed lower disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–837 · show in text ↑
e5

“Based on effectiveness of fungicides in vitro, they were further tested under in vivo conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The carbendazim seed treatment followed by validamycin foliar spray gave the highest maize grain yield in vivo.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
carbendazim 50 WP @ 0.1 % applied as seed treatment followed by validamycin 3SLfoliar spraye3
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Value
2750Kg/hae4
Qualifier
followed by 2750Kg/ha @ 0.2 per cente4
Setting
in vivo conditionse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“management of banded leaf and sheath blight of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–139 · show in text ↑
e3

“carbendazim 50 WP @ 0.1 % applied as seed treatment followed by validamycin 3SLfoliar spray showed lower disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–837 · show in text ↑
e4

“highest grain yield followed by 2750Kg/ha @ 0.2 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–895 · show in text ↑
e5

“Based on effectiveness of fungicides in vitro, they were further tested under in vivo conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–714 · show in text ↑

difenoconazole · Rhizoctonia solani · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

validamycin A · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

carbendazim · Rhizoctonia solani · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

carbendazim · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 150 positive, 15 negative or no effect

149 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

161 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

574 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

625 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

seed treatment · Rhizoctonia solani · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · Rhizoctonia solani · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.