Paper · 2023 · Plant Disease Research

Effect of weather variables on banded leaf and sheath blight (Rhizoctonia solani f. sp. sasakii) of fodder maize and its integrated management

D. K. Banyal; Ashima Thakur; Sonali Parwan; et al.

14
claims
29
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L.) is an important Kharif fodder crop which gives highly succulent and nutritionally rich fodder and also a rich source of starch, protein and edible oil. Banded leaf and sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani f. sp. sasakii is one of the most important disease of maize and has gained economic importance. The disease was monitored at Palampur for three consecutive years and 9.33 per cent disease incidence was observed. The temperature, rainfall and relative humidity contributed 76, 71 and 63 per cent effect on the disease incidence in 2017, 2018 and 2019 cropping years, respectively. During Kharif 2017 and 2018, a field experiment was conducted for integrated management of the disease and seed treatment with carbendazim, followed by two foliar applications of trifloxystrobin+tebuconazole @ 1g/l, was found to be highly effective with 79.61 per cent disease control and 11.88 per cent increase in yield over check. Among non-chemical disease control, seed treatment with Trichoderma viride followed by two foliar applications of Pseudomonas fluorescens @ 5g/l (CFU 107) reduced the prevalence of disease by 38.44 per cent with 4.36 per cent increase in the green fodder yield. Integration of biological control agent (BCA)’s and chemicals also provided good disease management and increase in green fodder yield ranging from 55-65 per cent and 4-9 per cent, respectively. Among combinations of BCA’s and chemicals, seed treatment with carbendazim@ 2 g/kg seed followed by one spray each of carbendazim@ 1g/l and P. fluorescens @ 5g (CFU 107)/l gave 61.54 per cent disease control and 6.60 per cent increase in yield. This was followed by seed treatment with carbendazim@ 2 g/kg seed followed by one spray each of (trifloxystrobin +tebuconazole) @ 1g/l and P. fluorescens@ 5g (CFU 107)/ l with disease control of 59.23 per cent and yield increase of 6.99 per cent, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banded leaf and sheath blight incidence at Palampur was 9.33%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solani f. sp. sasakiiRhizoctonia solani f. sp. sasakiie1pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Value
9.33 per cente0
Setting
Palampure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani f. sp. sasakii
Rhizoctonia solani f. sp. sasakii · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Tashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The disease was monitored at Palampur for three consecutive years and 9.33 per cent disease incidence was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–443 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and its integrated management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–142 · show in text ↑
e1

“Banded leaf and sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani f. sp. sasakii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–245 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weather variables contributed 76 per cent to disease incidence in 2017.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Value
76e0
Setting
2017e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The temperature, rainfall and relative humidity contributed 76, 71 and 63 per cent effect on the disease incidence in 2017, 2018 and 2019 cropping years, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and its integrated management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–142 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weather variables contributed 71 per cent to disease incidence in 2018.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Value
71e0
Setting
2018e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The temperature, rainfall and relative humidity contributed 76, 71 and 63 per cent effect on the disease incidence in 2017, 2018 and 2019 cropping years, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and its integrated management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–142 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weather variables contributed 63 per cent to disease incidence in 2019.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Value
63 per cente0
Setting
2019e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The temperature, rainfall and relative humidity contributed 76, 71 and 63 per cent effect on the disease incidence in 2017, 2018 and 2019 cropping years, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and its integrated management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim seed treatment followed by trifloxystrobin and tebuconazole sprays achieved 79.61 per cent disease control.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
seed treatment with carbendazim, followed by two foliar applications of trifloxystrobin+tebuconazole @ 1g/le0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
highly effectivee0
Value
79.61 per cente0
Comparator
checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment with carbendazim, followed by two foliar applications of trifloxystrobin+tebuconazole @ 1g/l, was found to be highly effective with 79.61 per cent disease control and 11.88 per cent increase in yield over check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and its integrated management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same chemical treatment raised yield 11.88 per cent over check.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
seed treatment with carbendazim, followed by two foliar applications of trifloxystrobin+tebuconazole @ 1g/le0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
11.88 per cente0
Comparator
checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment with carbendazim, followed by two foliar applications of trifloxystrobin+tebuconazole @ 1g/l, was found to be highly effective with 79.61 per cent disease control and 11.88 per cent increase in yield over check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and its integrated management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma seed treatment followed by Pseudomonas sprays reduced disease prevalence 38.44 per cent.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
seed treatment with Trichoderma viride followed by two foliar applications of Pseudomonas fluorescens @ 5g/l (CFU 107)e0
Interactor
Trichoderma virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
prevalence of diseasee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
38.44 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment with Trichoderma viride followed by two foliar applications of Pseudomonas fluorescens @ 5g/l (CFU 107) reduced the prevalence of disease by 38.44 per cent with 4.36 per cent increase in the green fodder yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and its integrated management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That biological treatment increased green fodder yield 4.36 per cent.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
seed treatment with Trichoderma viride followed by two foliar applications of Pseudomonas fluorescens @ 5g/l (CFU 107)e0
Outcome
green fodder yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
4.36 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment with Trichoderma viride followed by two foliar applications of Pseudomonas fluorescens @ 5g/l (CFU 107) reduced the prevalence of disease by 38.44 per cent with 4.36 per cent increase in the green fodder yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and its integrated management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined biological and chemical control managed disease by 55-65 per cent.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Integration of biological control agent (BCA)’s and chemicalse0
Outcome
disease managemente0
Direction
goode0
Value
55-65 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Integration of biological control agent (BCA)’s and chemicals also provided good disease management and increase in green fodder yield ranging from 55-65 per cent and 4-9 per cent, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and its integrated management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined biological and chemical control increased green fodder yield by 4-9 per cent.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Integration of biological control agent (BCA)’s and chemicalse0
Outcome
green fodder yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
4-9 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Integration of biological control agent (BCA)’s and chemicals also provided good disease management and increase in green fodder yield ranging from 55-65 per cent and 4-9 per cent, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and its integrated management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim seed treatment plus carbendazim and Pseudomonas sprays achieved 61.54 per cent disease control.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
seed treatment with carbendazim@ 2 g/kg seed followed by one spray each of carbendazim@ 1g/l and P. fluorescens @ 5g (CFU 107)/le0
Outcome
disease controle0
Value
61.54 per cente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment with carbendazim@ 2 g/kg seed followed by one spray each of carbendazim@ 1g/l and P. fluorescens @ 5g (CFU 107)/l gave 61.54 per cent disease control and 6.60 per cent increase in yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1647 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and its integrated management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That treatment increased yield 6.60 per cent.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
seed treatment with carbendazim@ 2 g/kg seed followed by one spray each of carbendazim@ 1g/l and P. fluorescens @ 5g (CFU 107)/le0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
6.60 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment with carbendazim@ 2 g/kg seed followed by one spray each of carbendazim@ 1g/l and P. fluorescens @ 5g (CFU 107)/l gave 61.54 per cent disease control and 6.60 per cent increase in yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1647 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and its integrated management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim seed treatment plus fungicide and Pseudomonas sprays achieved 59.23 per cent disease control.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
seed treatment with carbendazim@ 2 g/kg seed followed by one spray each of (trifloxystrobin +tebuconazole) @ 1g/l and P. fluorescens@ 5g (CFU 107)/ le0
Outcome
disease controle0
Value
59.23 per cente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment with carbendazim@ 2 g/kg seed followed by one spray each of (trifloxystrobin +tebuconazole) @ 1g/l and P. fluorescens@ 5g (CFU 107)/ l with disease control of 59.23 per cent and yield increase of 6.99 per cent, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1669–1908 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and its integrated management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That treatment increased yield 6.99 per cent.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
seed treatment with carbendazim@ 2 g/kg seed followed by one spray each of (trifloxystrobin +tebuconazole) @ 1g/l and P. fluorescens@ 5g (CFU 107)/ le0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
6.99 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment with carbendazim@ 2 g/kg seed followed by one spray each of (trifloxystrobin +tebuconazole) @ 1g/l and P. fluorescens@ 5g (CFU 107)/ l with disease control of 59.23 per cent and yield increase of 6.99 per cent, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1669–1908 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and its integrated management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–142 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas fluorescens · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

carbendazim · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

trifloxystrobin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

carbendazim · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Trichoderma viride · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Trichoderma viride · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

biocontrol · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.