Paper · 2021 · Russian Agency for Digital Standardization

THE STRUCTURE OF PRODUCTIVITY OF SPRING WHEAT DEPENDING ON THE VARIETY AND FOLIAR TREATMENT WITH MANGANESE, COPPER AND MOLYBDENUM

Ivanov, Dmitriy; Ivanova, Natalia; Prokina, Ludmila; et al.

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The article presents the results of research on the structure of productivity of spring wheat depending on the variety and use of trace elements of manganese, copper, molybdenum and "Ultramag Combi". It was found that the best productivity indicators were formed by the spring wheat variety Yoldyz. The optimal combination of microelements that positively affect the structure of spring wheat productivity has been established. The best indicators of the structure of the spring wheat yield of Tulaykovskaya 10 and Tulaykovskaya 108 varieties were formed when foliar treatment of crops with a paired mixture of copper and molybdenum with nitrogen, and Yoldyz varieties - manganese and copper, as well as manganese and molybdenum with nitrogen. Foliar treatment with a multi-component preparation "Ultramag Combi", as well as separately applied nitrogen in amide form, was less effective.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The spring wheat variety Yoldyz formed the best productivity indicators.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume2
Material
Yoldyze2
Outcome
productivity indicatorse2
Qualifier
beste2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the best productivity indicators were formed by the spring wheat variety Yoldyz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal combination of microelements positively affected the structure of spring wheat productivity.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume3
Treatment
combination of microelementse3
Outcome
structure of spring wheat productivitye3
Direction
positively affecte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The optimal combination of microelements that positively affect the structure of spring wheat productivity has been established”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar copper and molybdenum with nitrogen gave the best yield-structure indicators in Tulaykovskaya 10 and Tulaykovskaya 108.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume4
Material
Tulaykovskaya 10 and Tulaykovskaya 108e4
Treatment
foliar treatment of crops with a paired mixture of copper and molybdenum with nitrogene4
Outcome
best indicators of the structure of the spring wheat yielde4
Direction
beste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The best indicators of the structure of the spring wheat yield of Tulaykovskaya 10 and Tulaykovskaya 108 varieties were formed when foliar treatment of crops with a paired mixture of copper and molybdenum with nitrogen, and Yoldyz varieties - manganese and copper, as well as manganese and molybdenum with nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yoldyz with manganese and copper gave the best yield-structure indicators.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume4
Material
Yoldyze4
Treatment
manganese and coppere4
Outcome
best indicators of the structure of the spring wheat yielde4
Direction
beste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The best indicators of the structure of the spring wheat yield of Tulaykovskaya 10 and Tulaykovskaya 108 varieties were formed when foliar treatment of crops with a paired mixture of copper and molybdenum with nitrogen, and Yoldyz varieties - manganese and copper, as well as manganese and molybdenum with nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yoldyz with manganese and molybdenum with nitrogen gave the best yield-structure indicators.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume4
Material
Yoldyze4
Treatment
manganese and molybdenum with nitrogene4
Outcome
best indicators of the structure of the spring wheat yielde4
Direction
beste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The best indicators of the structure of the spring wheat yield of Tulaykovskaya 10 and Tulaykovskaya 108 varieties were formed when foliar treatment of crops with a paired mixture of copper and molybdenum with nitrogen, and Yoldyz varieties - manganese and copper, as well as manganese and molybdenum with nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Ultramag Combi was less effective in spring wheat.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
Ultramag Combie5
Outcome
effectivee5
Direction
lesse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The article presents the results of research on the structure of productivity of spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑
e5

“Foliar treatment with a multi-component preparation "Ultramag Combi", as well as separately applied nitrogen in amide form, was less effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Separately applied nitrogen in amide form was less effective in spring wheat.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
nitrogen in amide forme5
Outcome
effectivee5
Direction
lesse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The article presents the results of research on the structure of productivity of spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑
e5

“Foliar treatment with a multi-component preparation "Ultramag Combi", as well as separately applied nitrogen in amide form, was less effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–886 · show in text ↑

molybdenum atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

26 papers: 19 positive, 7 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

manganese atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

65 papers: 61 positive, 4 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

copper atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 63 positive, 12 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.