Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Semi-permanent Shadenet house for reducing the sunburn in pomegranates (Punica granatum)

SJ Kale; Prerna Nath; VS Meena; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Pomegranate has great economic importance however its major share is damaged due to sunburn. Different techniques like increasing humidity around plant; use of cloth, paper bags to cover fruits; application of reflective materials etc. have been tried to reduce sunburn. Reflective materials and chemicals are preferred due to ease in application; however their use is not desirable in food commodities. Hence, study was conducted to develop semi-permanent shadenet house (SPSH) to reduce sunburn in pomegranates cultivated in hot region. 50% black shadenet was used as shading material. Front height, rear height, length and width of structure were 3.66 m, 3 m, 24.38 m and 6 m, respectively. Shadenet was removed after harvesting to attain tangible plant growth and again installed after fruit setting. Results indicated that installation of SPSH from May to August (or till harvesting) reduced sunburn to 2.9% against 17% sunburn in plants without any shade. SPSH imparted deep red color to peel and arils and increased juice recovery by 20-25%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SPSH reduced sunburn to 2.9% versus 17% without shade.

Taxon
pomegranatesPunica granatumt0
Treatment
installation of SPSH from May to August (or till harvesting)e0
Outcome
sunburne0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2.9%e0
Qualifier
17%e0
Comparator
plants without any shadee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“installation of SPSH from May to August (or till harvesting) reduced sunburn to 2.9% against 17% sunburn in plants without any shade.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SPSH imparted deep red color to peel and arils.

Taxon
pomegranatesPunica granatumt0
Organ / stage
peel and arilse0
Treatment
SPSHe0
Outcome
deep red colore0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SPSH imparted deep red color to peel and arils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SPSH increased juice recovery by 20-25%.

Taxon
pomegranatesPunica granatumt0
Treatment
SPSHe0
Outcome
juice recoverye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20-25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SPSH imparted deep red color to peel and arils and increased juice recovery by 20-25%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑

shade · quality: postharvest · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.