Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Studies on influence of organic nutrient management on storability of onion bulb

Wankhade Sd; Kale Vs

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present experiment was conducted at Main Garden Department of Horticulture, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola in the year 2015-2016 and 2016-2017. The result revealed the total loss of stored bulbs increased steadily as the period of storage extended. The treatment consisting of 50% RDN through FYM (q ha-1) + 50% RDN through Vermicompost (q ha-1) + Azatobactor (kg ha-1) + PSB (kg ha-1) registered the lowest total loss, Rotting and physiological loss in weight at 120 days of storage during both years of experiment under study. Whereas, the lowest sprouting was recorded under the treatment consisting of 50% RDN through FYM (q ha-1) + 50% RDN through Neem cake (q ha-1) + Azatobactor (kg ha-1) + PSB (kg ha-1). The inorganic treatment consisting of 100 per cent recommended dose of NPK fertilizer significantly varied from organic treatment and recorded maximum storage loss.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total loss of stored onion bulbs increased with storage duration.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Outcome
total loss of stored bulbse0
Direction
increased steadilye0
Setting
period of storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The result revealed the total loss of stored bulbs increased steadily as the period of storage extended.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–269 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The FYM plus vermicompost treatment produced the lowest total loss after 120 days of onion storage in both years.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
50% RDN through FYM (q ha-1) + 50% RDN through Vermicompost (q ha-1) + Azatobactor (kg ha-1) + PSB (kg ha-1)e0
Outcome
total losse0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
at 120 days of storage during both years of experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment consisting of 50% RDN through FYM (q ha-1) + 50% RDN through Vermicompost (q ha-1) + Azatobactor (kg ha-1) + PSB (kg ha-1) registered the lowest total loss, Rotting and physiological loss in weight at 120 days of storage during both years of experiment under study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–549 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The FYM plus vermicompost treatment produced the lowest Rotting after 120 days of onion storage in both years.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
50% RDN through FYM (q ha-1) + 50% RDN through Vermicompost (q ha-1) + Azatobactor (kg ha-1) + PSB (kg ha-1)e0
Outcome
Rottinge0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
at 120 days of storage during both years of experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment consisting of 50% RDN through FYM (q ha-1) + 50% RDN through Vermicompost (q ha-1) + Azatobactor (kg ha-1) + PSB (kg ha-1) registered the lowest total loss, Rotting and physiological loss in weight at 120 days of storage during both years of experiment under study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–549 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The FYM plus vermicompost treatment produced the lowest physiological loss in weight after 120 days of onion storage in both years.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
50% RDN through FYM (q ha-1) + 50% RDN through Vermicompost (q ha-1) + Azatobactor (kg ha-1) + PSB (kg ha-1)e0
Outcome
physiological loss in weighte0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
at 120 days of storage during both years of experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment consisting of 50% RDN through FYM (q ha-1) + 50% RDN through Vermicompost (q ha-1) + Azatobactor (kg ha-1) + PSB (kg ha-1) registered the lowest total loss, Rotting and physiological loss in weight at 120 days of storage during both years of experiment under study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–549 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The FYM plus neem cake treatment gave the lowest onion sprouting.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
50% RDN through FYM (q ha-1) + 50% RDN through Neem cake (q ha-1) + Azatobactor (kg ha-1) + PSB (kg ha-1)e0
Outcome
sproutinge0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest sprouting was recorded under the treatment consisting of 50% RDN through FYM (q ha-1) + 50% RDN through Neem cake (q ha-1) + Azatobactor (kg ha-1) + PSB (kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The inorganic NPK treatment produced maximum onion storage loss and differed significantly from organic treatments.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
100 per cent recommended dose of NPK fertilizere0
Outcome
storage losse0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
organic treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inorganic treatment consisting of 100 per cent recommended dose of NPK fertilizer significantly varied from organic treatment and recorded maximum storage loss.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–80 · show in text ↑

fertilization · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 22 positive, 6 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 53 positive, 16 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

botanical · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.