Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Iron fertilization to alleviate iron deficiency in irrigated maize hybrid in non-calcareous soil

C. Bharathi

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to study the effect of iron fertilization to alleviate iron deficiency in irrigated maize hybrid in non calcareous soil. The design of the experiment was Randomized Block Design (RBD). The experimental soil is sandy loam at MRS, Vagarai. The effect of Tamil Nadu Agricultural University micro nutrient (MN) mixture and FeSO4 were studied by applying it as a direct chemical fertilizer and as enriched form with and without FeSO4 foliar spray. Among the different treatments, The highest grain yield was recorded in 100% RDF+ Basal application of TNAU MN mixture @ 30 kg ha-1 as EFYM+ Foliar spray of 1% FeSO4 at 30 DAS followed by 100% RDF+ Basal application of TNAU MN mixture @ 30 kg ha-1 as EFYM and the lowest being in 100% RDF. The soil iron content showed significant difference due to different treatments at 45 DAS and at harvest. Application of FeSO4 enriched application showed higher Fe content in soil when compared to the application of TNAU MN mixture either straight or enriched application in non calcareous soils. Application of TNAU MN mixture either straight or enriched was found to be good in enhancing the Fe uptake of the crop in grain and stalk at harvest due to the higher DMP and yield parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified TNAU mixture plus foliar FeSO4 treatment had the highest maize grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
100% RDF+ Basal application of TNAU MN mixture @ 30 kg ha-1 as EFYM+ Foliar spray of 1% FeSO4 at 30 DASe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield was recorded in 100% RDF+ Basal application of TNAU MN mixture @ 30 kg ha-1 as EFYM+ Foliar spray of 1% FeSO4 at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–651 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The TNAU mixture as EFYM alone had the next highest maize grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
100% RDF+ Basal application of TNAU MN mixture @ 30 kg ha-1 as EFYMe0
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
followed bye0
Comparator
100% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by 100% RDF+ Basal application of TNAU MN mixture @ 30 kg ha-1 as EFYM and the lowest being in 100% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% RDF treatment gave the lowest maize grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and the lowest being in 100% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil iron differed significantly among treatments at 45 DAS and harvest.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
different treatmentse0
Outcome
soil iron contente0
Qualifier
45 DAS and at harveste0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil iron content showed significant difference due to different treatments at 45 DAS and at harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FeSO4 enrichment raised soil Fe content above TNAU mixture applications.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
FeSO4 enriched applicatione0
Outcome
Fe content in soile0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
TNAU MN mixture either straight or enriched applicatione0
Setting
non calcareous soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of FeSO4 enriched application showed higher Fe content in soil when compared to the application of TNAU MN mixture either straight or enriched application in non calcareous soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straight or enriched TNAU mixture enhanced crop Fe uptake in grain and stalk.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
grain and stalke0
Treatment
TNAU MN mixture either straight or enrichede0
Outcome
Fe uptake of the crop in grain and stalke0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of TNAU MN mixture either straight or enriched was found to be good in enhancing the Fe uptake of the crop in grain and stalk at harvest due to the higher DMP and yield parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑

micronutrient · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

574 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

625 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.