Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at the Agricultural College Farm, Bapatla, during kharif, 2012 to study the effect of different sources of organic nutrients (poultry manure, FYM, neemcake and vermicompost) and recommended dose of NPK on grain yield and quality of rice. The experimental results indicated that the different sources of organic nutrients significantly influenced the grain yield. However the quality parameters viz., protein, amylose contents, milling per cent, hulling per cent, head rice recovery, L/B ratio, volume expansion ratio, kernel elongation ratio, water uptake and solid loss were not influenced by the different organic sources of nitrogen.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Organic nutrients significantly influenced rice grain yield.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- different sources of organic nutrientse0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e0“different sources of organic nutrients significantly influenced the grain yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic nitrogen sources did not significantly influence rice compositional quality.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- different organic sources of nitrogene0
- Outcome
- protein, amylose contentse0
- Direction
- not influencede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e0“protein, amylose contents, milling per cent, hulling per cent, head rice recovery, L/B ratio, volume expansion ratio, kernel elongation ratio, water uptake and solid loss were not influenced by the different organic sources of nitrogen”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic nitrogen sources did not significantly influence milling and hulling traits.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- different organic sources of nitrogene0
- Outcome
- milling per cent, hulling per cent, head rice recoverye0
- Direction
- not influencede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e0“protein, amylose contents, milling per cent, hulling per cent, head rice recovery, L/B ratio, volume expansion ratio, kernel elongation ratio, water uptake and solid loss were not influenced by the different organic sources of nitrogen”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic nitrogen sources did not significantly influence grain shape and cooking quality.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- different organic sources of nitrogene0
- Outcome
- L/B ratio, volume expansion ratio, kernel elongation ratioe0
- Direction
- not influencede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e0“protein, amylose contents, milling per cent, hulling per cent, head rice recovery, L/B ratio, volume expansion ratio, kernel elongation ratio, water uptake and solid loss were not influenced by the different organic sources of nitrogen”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic nitrogen sources did not significantly influence water uptake and solid loss.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- different organic sources of nitrogene0
- Outcome
- water uptake and solid losse0
- Direction
- not influencede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e0“protein, amylose contents, milling per cent, hulling per cent, head rice recovery, L/B ratio, volume expansion ratio, kernel elongation ratio, water uptake and solid loss were not influenced by the different organic sources of nitrogen”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
96 papers more in this group
See all 100 papers →nitrogen · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
98 papers more in this group
See all 102 papers →nitrogen · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 402 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
507 papers more in this group
See all 511 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.