Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Efficacy of actinomycetes, Rhizobium and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria consortium inoculants on symbiotic traits, nodule leghemoglobin and yield of soybean in central India

FC Amule; Pawan Sirothiya; AK Rawat; et al.

9
claims
25
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out research field, JNKVV, Jabalpur (M.P.) during the kharif season of 2016 to find out the efficacy of Actinomycetes, Rhizobium and PGPR consortium inoculants on symbiotic traits, nodule leghemoglobin and yield of soybean in a Vertisol of Central India. The said experiment was the field testing part of research which was conducted during 2002-2007 to 2007-2012. The efficacy of two isolates of each microbial inoculants as mono-inoculation and their combinations as co-inoculation of Actinomycetes, Rhizobium and PGPR were tested along with fertilized uninoculated control (FUI) and unfertilized uninoculated control (UFUI) were also evaluated. Results revealed that the among microbial inoculants, the Actinomycetes + consortia of Rhizobium and PGPR (CRP) was found most effective in respect of symbiotic parameters including nodule number (30.8 and 30.0 nodules plant-1), nodule dry weight (42.1 and 61.7 mg/plant) at 35 and 55 DAS respectively, shoot and root dry weight (2.78 and 0.56 g plant-1) at 45 DAS respectively, leghemoglobin content (1.88 and 2.15 mg/g of fresh nodule) at 35 and 55 DAS respectively, followed by CRP nodule number (26.0 and 28.3 nodules plant-1), nodule dry weight (37.5 and 56.2 mg plant-1), shoot and root dry weight (2.52 and 0.53 g plant-1), leghemoglobin content (1.68 and 1.92 mg g-1 of fresh nodule) and also showed its positive effect in enhancing all the yield attributing parameters, seed and stover yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Actinomycetes plus Rhizobium-PGPR consortium gave the highest nodule number among inoculants, 30.8 and 30.0 nodules per plant

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Actinomycetes + consortia of Rhizobium and PGPR (CRP)e1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
nodule numbere1
Direction
most effectivee1
Value
30.8 and 30.0 nodules plant-1e1
Comparator
microbial inoculantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield of soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“the among microbial inoculants, the Actinomycetes + consortia of Rhizobium and PGPR (CRP) was found most effective in respect of symbiotic parameters including nodule number (30.8 and 30.0 nodules plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Actinomycetes plus Rhizobium-PGPR consortium gave the highest nodule dry weight among inoculants, 42.1 and 61.7 mg per plant

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Actinomycetes + consortia of Rhizobium and PGPR (CRP)e1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
nodule dry weighte2
Direction
most effectivee1
Value
42.1 and 61.7 mg/plante2
Comparator
microbial inoculantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield of soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“the among microbial inoculants, the Actinomycetes + consortia of Rhizobium and PGPR (CRP) was found most effective in respect of symbiotic parameters including nodule number (30.8 and 30.0 nodules plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–906 · show in text ↑
e2

“nodule dry weight (42.1 and 61.7 mg/plant) at 35 and 55 DAS respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Actinomycetes plus Rhizobium-PGPR consortium gave the highest shoot and root dry weight among inoculants, 2.78 and 0.56 g per plant

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Actinomycetes + consortia of Rhizobium and PGPR (CRP)e1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
shoot and root dry weighte3
Direction
most effectivee1
Value
2.78 and 0.56 g plant-1e3
Comparator
microbial inoculantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield of soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“the among microbial inoculants, the Actinomycetes + consortia of Rhizobium and PGPR (CRP) was found most effective in respect of symbiotic parameters including nodule number (30.8 and 30.0 nodules plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–906 · show in text ↑
e3

“shoot and root dry weight (2.78 and 0.56 g plant-1) at 45 DAS respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Actinomycetes plus Rhizobium-PGPR consortium gave the highest leghemoglobin content among inoculants, 1.88 and 2.15 mg per g of fresh nodule

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Actinomycetes + consortia of Rhizobium and PGPR (CRP)e1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
leghemoglobin contente4
Direction
most effectivee1
Value
1.88 and 2.15 mg/g of fresh nodulee4
Comparator
microbial inoculantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield of soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“the among microbial inoculants, the Actinomycetes + consortia of Rhizobium and PGPR (CRP) was found most effective in respect of symbiotic parameters including nodule number (30.8 and 30.0 nodules plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–906 · show in text ↑
e4

“leghemoglobin content (1.88 and 2.15 mg/g of fresh nodule) at 35 and 55 DAS respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CRP inoculant gave 26.0 and 28.3 nodules per plant, ranking second after the top treatment

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
CRPe5
Outcome
nodule numbere5
Direction
followed bye5
Value
26.0 and 28.3 nodules plant-1e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield of soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–162 · show in text ↑
e5

“followed by CRP nodule number (26.0 and 28.3 nodules plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CRP inoculant gave 37.5 and 56.2 mg nodule dry weight per plant, ranking second

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
CRPe5
Outcome
nodule dry weighte6
Direction
followed bye5
Value
37.5 and 56.2 mg plant-1e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield of soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–162 · show in text ↑
e5

“followed by CRP nodule number (26.0 and 28.3 nodules plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1209 · show in text ↑
e6

“nodule dry weight (37.5 and 56.2 mg plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CRP inoculant gave 2.52 and 0.53 g shoot and root dry weight per plant, ranking second

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
CRPe5
Outcome
shoot and root dry weighte7
Direction
followed bye5
Value
2.52 and 0.53 g plant-1e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield of soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–162 · show in text ↑
e5

“followed by CRP nodule number (26.0 and 28.3 nodules plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1209 · show in text ↑
e7

“shoot and root dry weight (2.52 and 0.53 g plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CRP inoculant gave 1.68 and 1.92 mg per g of fresh nodule leghemoglobin content, ranking second

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
CRPe5
Outcome
leghemoglobin contente1
Direction
followed bye5
Value
1.68 and 1.92 mg g-1 of fresh nodulee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield of soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–162 · show in text ↑
e5

“followed by CRP nodule number (26.0 and 28.3 nodules plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1209 · show in text ↑
e1

“leghemoglobin content (1.68 and 1.92 mg g-1 of fresh nodule)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1370 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CRP inoculant enhanced yield attributing parameters and seed and stover yields of soybean

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
CRPe5
Outcome
yield attributing parameters, seed and stover yieldse2
Direction
enhancinge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield of soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–162 · show in text ↑
e5

“followed by CRP nodule number (26.0 and 28.3 nodules plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1209 · show in text ↑
e2

“showed its positive effect in enhancing all the yield attributing parameters, seed and stover yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1480 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

92 papers: 83 positive, 9 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

Rhizobium · molecular: metabolites · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Rhizobium · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 45 positive, 1 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 45 positive, 2 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 67 positive, 8 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

310 papers: 265 positive, 45 negative or no effect

264 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

306 papers more in this group

See all 310 papers →

inoculation · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

358 papers: 323 positive, 35 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

354 papers more in this group

See all 358 papers →

inoculation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 491 positive, 75 negative or no effect

490 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.