Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Influence of irrigation scheduling and weed management practices on weed density and performance of dry direct seeded rice

Lalit Kumar Rolaniya; Vivek Vivek; Robin Kumar; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out at Chirrori farm of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut (U.P.) in spilt plot design. The main plots in the study included four irrigation scheduling namely, continuous shallow flooding irrigation at 10 kPa (I1), alternate wetting drying irrigation at 20 kPa (I2), alternate wetting drying irrigation at 20 kPa with irrigation after herbicide application (I3) and alternate wetting drying irrigation at 20 kPa with mid-season drying (45 to 80 DAS irrigation at 40 kPa) (I4) and sub-plot with weed management treatments i.e. weedy treatment (W1), weed free (W2), pre-emergence Pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i. ha-1 fb post-emergence Bispyribac-Na @ 25 g a.i. ha-1 (W3) and Propanil @ 4 kg a.i. ha-1 + Pendimethalin 1 kg a.i. ha-1 (W4). Continuous shallow flooding irrigation at 10 kPa (I1) reduces the weed density significantly. The applications of Pendimethalin 1 kg a.i. ha-1 at 3 DAS followed by Bispyribac 25 g a.i. ha-1 at 25 DAS (W3) controlled weed very effectively and produce similar yield (6.32 t ha-1) as weed free (W2) (6.67 t ha-1). However, the study also suggested that detail study should be carried out to understand interaction of irrigation scheduling and weed management practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous shallow flooding irrigation at 10 kPa (I1) significantly reduced weed density in dry direct seeded rice.

Treatment
Continuous shallow flooding irrigation at 10 kPa (I1)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reducese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Continuous shallow flooding irrigation at 10 kPa (I1) reduces the weed density significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin at 3 DAS followed by Bispyribac at 25 DAS (W3) controlled weeds very effectively.

Treatment
Pendimethalin 1 kg a.i. ha-1 at 3 DAS followed by Bispyribac 25 g a.i. ha-1 at 25 DAS (W3)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
controlled weede0
Direction
very effectivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The applications of Pendimethalin 1 kg a.i. ha-1 at 3 DAS followed by Bispyribac 25 g a.i. ha-1 at 25 DAS (W3) controlled weed very effectively and produce similar yield (6.32 t ha-1) as weed free (W2) (6.67 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield under W3 (6.32 t/ha) was similar to the weed free treatment (6.67 t/ha).

Treatment
Pendimethalin 1 kg a.i. ha-1 at 3 DAS followed by Bispyribac 25 g a.i. ha-1 at 25 DAS (W3)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
similare0
Value
6.32 t ha-1e0
Qualifier
6.67 t ha-1e0
Comparator
weed free (W2)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The applications of Pendimethalin 1 kg a.i. ha-1 at 3 DAS followed by Bispyribac 25 g a.i. ha-1 at 25 DAS (W3) controlled weed very effectively and produce similar yield (6.32 t ha-1) as weed free (W2) (6.67 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–122 · show in text ↑

bispyribac · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

128 papers: 125 positive, 3 negative or no effect

124 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

124 papers more in this group

See all 128 papers →

pendimethalin · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

135 papers: 126 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 126 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

131 papers more in this group

See all 135 papers →

bispyribac · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

32 papers: 32 positive, 0 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

flooding · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

irrigation · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 25 positive, 7 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.