Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Alleviating iron deficiency through iron fertilization in calcareous soil

C. Bharathi

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to study the effect of iron fertilization to alleviate iron deficiency in irrigated maize hybrid in calcareous soil in farmers holding at Vagarai village, Dindigul District, Tamil Nadu. The effect of Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Micro Nutrient (TNAU MN) mixture and ferrous sulphate (FeSO4) were studied by applying it as a direct chemical fertilizer and as an enriched form with and without FeSO4 foliar spray. The results revealed that, the highest grain yield was recorded in 100% RDF+ Basal application of TNAU MN mixture @ 30 kg ha-1 as EFYM+ Foliar spray of 1% FeSO4 at 30 DAS followed by 100% RDF+ Basal application of TNAU MN mixture @ 30 kg ha-1 as EFYM and the lowest being in 100% RDF. The stalk yield also followed the same trend as that of grain yield. Application of FeSO4 enriched application showed higher Fe content in soil when compared to the application of TNAU MN mixture either straight or enriched application. Application of TNAU MN mixture either straight or enriched was found to be good in enhancing the Fe uptake of the crop in grain and stalk due to the higher DMP and yield parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest grain yield was obtained with 100% RDF, basal TNAU MN mixture as EFYM and foliar 1% FeSO4 spray.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
maize hybride0
Treatment
100% RDF+ Basal application of TNAU MN mixture @ 30 kg ha-1 as EFYM+ Foliar spray of 1% FeSO4 at 30 DASe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Setting
Vagarai village, Dindigul District, Tamil Nadue0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted to study the effect of iron fertilization to alleviate iron deficiency in irrigated maize hybrid in calcareous soil in farmers holding at Vagarai village, Dindigul District, Tamil Nadu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest grain yield was recorded in 100% RDF+ Basal application of TNAU MN mixture @ 30 kg ha-1 as EFYM+ Foliar spray of 1% FeSO4 at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–621 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest grain yield was in the 100% RDF treatment.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
100% RDFe2
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
loweste2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted to study the effect of iron fertilization to alleviate iron deficiency in irrigated maize hybrid in calcareous soil in farmers holding at Vagarai village, Dindigul District, Tamil Nadu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest grain yield was recorded in 100% RDF+ Basal application of TNAU MN mixture @ 30 kg ha-1 as EFYM+ Foliar spray of 1% FeSO4 at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–621 · show in text ↑
e2

“the lowest being in 100% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–734 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stalk yield followed the same trend as grain yield under the iron fertilization treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
stalk yielde3
Direction
followed the same trende3
Comparator
grain yielde3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted to study the effect of iron fertilization to alleviate iron deficiency in irrigated maize hybrid in calcareous soil in farmers holding at Vagarai village, Dindigul District, Tamil Nadu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e3

“The stalk yield also followed the same trend as that of grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FeSO4 enriched application gave higher Fe content in soil than straight or enriched TNAU MN mixture application.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
FeSO4 enriched applicatione4
Outcome
Fe content in soile4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
application of TNAU MN mixture either straight or enriched applicatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted to study the effect of iron fertilization to alleviate iron deficiency in irrigated maize hybrid in calcareous soil in farmers holding at Vagarai village, Dindigul District, Tamil Nadu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of FeSO4 enriched application showed higher Fe content in soil when compared to the application of TNAU MN mixture either straight or enriched application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–971 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TNAU MN mixture, straight or enriched, enhanced Fe uptake of the crop in grain and stalk.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
TNAU MN mixture either straight or enrichede5
Outcome
Fe uptake of the crop in grain and stalke5
Direction
enhancinge5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted to study the effect of iron fertilization to alleviate iron deficiency in irrigated maize hybrid in calcareous soil in farmers holding at Vagarai village, Dindigul District, Tamil Nadu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e5

“Application of TNAU MN mixture either straight or enriched was found to be good in enhancing the Fe uptake of the crop in grain and stalk”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1110 · show in text ↑

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

574 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

625 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.