Abstract
The experiment was conducted during rabi season 2015-16 and 2016-17. The present investigation entitled “Effect of Tillage Practices and Moisture Regimes on the Performance of Wheat” was conducted at Agronomy Research Farm, of Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, Narendra Nagar (Kumarganj) Faizabad (U.P.). The experiment was laid out in split plot design having four tillage practices (zero tillage, reduced tillage + sowing by seed cum ferti drill, conventional tillage + sowing on beds and conventional tillage+ sowing by seed cum ferti drill) as main plot treatments and five moisture regimes (irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE, irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE and irrigation at 1.2 IW/CPE irrigation at 3 Irrigation each at CRI, Late jointing and Milking stage and 5 Irrigation each at CRI, Tillering, Late jointing, Flowering and Milking stage) as sub plot treatments. 20 treatment combinations were replicated three times. The result revealed that the yield and yield attributes were recorded significantly higher in conventional tillage + sowing on bed, which was at par with conventional tillage+ sowing by seed cum ferti drill during both the years due to performance of tillage practices. However, the yield and yield attributes were significantly higher under irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE being at par with 1.2 IW/CPE ratio and 5 Irrigation each at CRI, tillering, late jointing, flowering and milking stage over rest of the treatments causes optimum availability of moisture at critical stage of the crop growth. The maximum net income (Rs. 82428 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.49) were calculated under conventional tillage + sowing on beds along with irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE ratio.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage with sowing on beds gave significantly higher wheat yield and yield attributes than the other tillage practices.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- conventional tillage + sowing on bede1
- Outcome
- yield and yield attributese1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- conventional tillage+ sowing by seed cum ferti drille1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the yield and yield attributes were recorded significantly higher in conventional tillage + sowing on bed, which was at par with conventional tillage+ sowing by seed cum ferti drill during both the years”
t0“yield attribute, yield and economics in wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE gave significantly higher yield and yield attributes than the rest of the treatments.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPEe2
- Outcome
- yield and yield attributese2
- Direction
- highere2
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“the yield and yield attributes were significantly higher under irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE being at par with 1.2 IW/CPE ratio”
e3“over rest of the treatments”
t0“yield attribute, yield and economics in wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Five irrigations at CRI, tillering, late jointing, flowering and milking stage gave yield and yield attributes at par with 1.0 IW/CPE and higher than the rest of the treatments.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 5 Irrigation each at CRI, tillering, late jointing, flowering and milking stagee4
- Outcome
- yield and yield attributese2
- Direction
- highere2
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“the yield and yield attributes were significantly higher under irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE being at par with 1.2 IW/CPE ratio”
e4“5 Irrigation each at CRI, tillering, late jointing, flowering and milking stage over rest of the treatments”
t0“yield attribute, yield and economics in wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage with sowing on beds and irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE gave the maximum net income (Rs. 82428 ha-1).
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- conventional tillage + sowing on beds along with irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE ratioe5
- Outcome
- net incomee5
- Direction
- maximume5
- Value
- Rs. 82428 ha-1e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“The maximum net income (Rs. 82428 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.49) were calculated under conventional tillage + sowing on beds along with irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE ratio”
t0“yield attribute, yield and economics in wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage with sowing on beds and irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE gave the maximum benefit cost ratio (2.49).
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- conventional tillage + sowing on beds along with irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE ratioe5
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe5
- Direction
- maximume5
- Value
- 2.49e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“The maximum net income (Rs. 82428 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.49) were calculated under conventional tillage + sowing on beds along with irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE ratio”
t0“yield attribute, yield and economics in wheat”
The same questions in other papers
stage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
156 papers more in this group
See all 160 papers →irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
985 papers more in this group
See all 989 papers →tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
1,410 papers more in this group
See all 1,414 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.