Paper · 2018 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Impact of water deficit (salt and drought) stress on physiological, biochemical and yield attributes on wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties

ASHWANI KUMAR; SURINDER KUMAR SHARMA; CHARU LATA; et al.

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
41
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

This investigation was carried out to assess the combined effect of salt stress and drought on physiological and biochemical traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties so as to deduce the probable mechanism of stress tolerance in these varieties. Two salt tolerant (Kharchia 65 and KRL 210) and two salt sensitive (HD 2851 and HD 2009) wheat varieties were subjected to salt (50 mM and 100 mM NaCl) and drought (25% and 50% water deficit) stresses alone as well as in combination to study the interactive effects of salt × drought stresses under pot house conditions at seedling stage. The data recorded on physiological (membrane injury, relative water content, chlorophyll content, Na+, K+, Cl- and K+/Na+), biochemical (total soluble sugars and proline) and yield (number of tillers, productive tillers, biomass, and 1000 seed weight) attributes indicated the effect of salt and drought stresses in the studied varieties. These stresses caused a significant decline in chlorophyll content, K+ content, number of tillers, number of productive tillers, biomass and yield in sensitive varieties, while the tolerant ones were least affected. The sensitive varieties HD 2851 and HD 2009 accumulated the highest Na+ and Cl+ content, whereas Kharchia 65 (tolerant) accumulated the lowest amount of these ions. All the varieties, however, showed increased accumulation of compatible solutes (total soluble sugars and proline) with inclined stress which helped in osmotic adjustment. Consistent and significant reductions were observed in number of tillers as well as in productive tillers with every successive increase in salt and drought stresses. Yield in terms of 1000 seed weight followed the trend: 34.51 g in Kharchia 65>28.52 g in KRL 210>24.89 g in HD 2009>24.55 g in HD 2851.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt and drought stress reduced chlorophyll content in sensitive wheat varieties.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
sensitive varietiese0
Treatment
These stressese0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“These stresses caused a significant decline in chlorophyll content, K+ content, number of tillers, number of productive tillers, biomass and yield in sensitive varieties, while the tolerant ones were least affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt and drought stress reduced K+ content in sensitive wheat varieties.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
sensitive varietiese0
Treatment
These stressese0
Outcome
K+ contente0
Direction
declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“These stresses caused a significant decline in chlorophyll content, K+ content, number of tillers, number of productive tillers, biomass and yield in sensitive varieties, while the tolerant ones were least affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt and drought stress reduced number of tillers in sensitive wheat varieties.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
sensitive varietiese0
Treatment
These stressese0
Outcome
number of tillerse0
Direction
declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“These stresses caused a significant decline in chlorophyll content, K+ content, number of tillers, number of productive tillers, biomass and yield in sensitive varieties, while the tolerant ones were least affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt and drought stress reduced number of productive tillers in sensitive wheat varieties.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
sensitive varietiese0
Treatment
These stressese0
Outcome
number of productive tillerse0
Direction
declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“These stresses caused a significant decline in chlorophyll content, K+ content, number of tillers, number of productive tillers, biomass and yield in sensitive varieties, while the tolerant ones were least affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt and drought stress reduced biomass in sensitive wheat varieties.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
sensitive varietiese0
Treatment
These stressese0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“These stresses caused a significant decline in chlorophyll content, K+ content, number of tillers, number of productive tillers, biomass and yield in sensitive varieties, while the tolerant ones were least affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt and drought stress reduced yield in sensitive wheat varieties.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
sensitive varietiese0
Treatment
These stressese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“These stresses caused a significant decline in chlorophyll content, K+ content, number of tillers, number of productive tillers, biomass and yield in sensitive varieties, while the tolerant ones were least affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1146 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HD 2851 had highest Na+ and Cl+ content.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
HD 2851e0
Outcome
Na+ and Cl+ contente0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“The sensitive varieties HD 2851 and HD 2009 accumulated the highest Na+ and Cl+ content, whereas Kharchia 65 (tolerant) accumulated the lowest amount of these ions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1311 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HD 2009 had highest Na+ and Cl+ content.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
HD 2009e0
Outcome
Na+ and Cl+ contente0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“The sensitive varieties HD 2851 and HD 2009 accumulated the highest Na+ and Cl+ content, whereas Kharchia 65 (tolerant) accumulated the lowest amount of these ions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1311 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kharchia 65 had lowest Na+ and Cl+ content.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
Kharchia 65e0
Outcome
Na+ and Cl+ contente0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“The sensitive varieties HD 2851 and HD 2009 accumulated the highest Na+ and Cl+ content, whereas Kharchia 65 (tolerant) accumulated the lowest amount of these ions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1311 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat varieties accumulated more total soluble sugars and proline with increasing stress.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
inclined stresse0
Outcome
total soluble sugars and prolinee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“All the varieties, however, showed increased accumulation of compatible solutes (total soluble sugars and proline) with inclined stress which helped in osmotic adjustment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Successive salt and drought stress increases reduced tiller and productive tiller numbers.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
salt and drought stressese0
Outcome
number of tillers as well as in productive tillerse0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“Consistent and significant reductions were observed in number of tillers as well as in productive tillers with every successive increase in salt and drought stresses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1650 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kharchia 65 had 1000 seed weight of 34.51 g.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
Kharchia 65e0
Outcome
1000 seed weighte0
Value
34.51 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield in terms of 1000 seed weight followed the trend: 34.51 g in Kharchia 65>28.52 g in KRL 210>24.89 g in HD 2009>24.55 g in HD 2851.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1651–1786 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KRL 210 had 1000 seed weight of 28.52 g.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
KRL 210e0
Outcome
1000 seed weighte0
Value
28.52 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield in terms of 1000 seed weight followed the trend: 34.51 g in Kharchia 65>28.52 g in KRL 210>24.89 g in HD 2009>24.55 g in HD 2851.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1651–1786 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HD 2009 had 1000 seed weight of 24.89 g.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
HD 2009e0
Outcome
1000 seed weighte0
Value
24.89 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield in terms of 1000 seed weight followed the trend: 34.51 g in Kharchia 65>28.52 g in KRL 210>24.89 g in HD 2009>24.55 g in HD 2851.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1651–1786 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HD 2851 had 1000 seed weight of 24.55 g.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
HD 2851e0
Outcome
1000 seed weighte0
Value
24.55 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield in terms of 1000 seed weight followed the trend: 34.51 g in Kharchia 65>28.52 g in KRL 210>24.89 g in HD 2009>24.55 g in HD 2851.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1651–1786 · show in text ↑

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.