Paper · 2022 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Salicylic acid and thiourea mitigate salinity and drought stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum)

TARAMANI YADAV; GAJENDER YADAV; ASHWANI KUMAR; et al.

10
claims
31
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Water and salinity stresses are the major environmental concerns limiting crop production, particularly in arid and semi-arid ecologies. Focused research is required to develop mitigating strategies to manage such stresses. Application of plant-bioregulators (PBRs) may be an effective option to manage water and salinity stresses. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted during 2016–17 and 2017–18 at semi-arid saline site of NW (north-western) India to assess the effectiveness of salicylic acid and thiourea in easing out the adverse effect of variable water deficit and irrigation water salinity regimes. Increasing water deficit and its salinity significantly (P<0.001) reduced all the studied growth parameters, viz. plant height, crop stand, no. of tillers, leaf area index and relative growth rate; and yield attributes like no. of effective tillers, spike length, grains/spike, grain weight/spike, 1000-grain weight, specific weight. Application of either salicylic acid or thiourea significantly improved growth parameters in comparison to control and thiourea proved more effective. Thiourea application improved grain yield by 3.96 and 17.36%, biological yield by 4.21 and 14.82%, effective no. of tillers by 3.77 and 11.91%, weight/spike by 2.83 and 15.17%, 1000-grain weight by 3.72 and 12.66% and specific weight by 2.04 and 8.84% compared to salicylic acid and control, respectively. This might be due to better nutrient uptake, water relations, enhanced CO2 fixation and effective partitioning of assimilates. Thus, thiourea and salicylic acid application in wheat found better as compared to control under saline water stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater water deficit and salinity significantly reduced wheat growth parameters.

Treatment
Increasing water deficit and its salinitye0
Outcome
plant height, crop stand, no. of tillers, leaf area index and relative growth ratee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing water deficit and its salinity significantly (P<0.001) reduced all the studied growth parameters, viz. plant height, crop stand, no. of tillers, leaf area index and relative growth rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater water deficit and salinity significantly reduced wheat yield attributes.

Treatment
Increasing water deficit and its salinitye1
Outcome
effective tillers, spike length, grains/spike, grain weight/spike, 1000-grain weight, specific weighte0
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and yield attributes like no. of effective tillers, spike length, grains/spike, grain weight/spike, 1000-grain weight, specific weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–945 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing water deficit and its salinity significantly (P<0.001) reduced all the studied growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both salicylic acid and thiourea significantly improved wheat growth relative to control, with thiourea more effective.

Treatment
salicylic acid or thioureae0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of either salicylic acid or thiourea significantly improved growth parameters in comparison to control and thiourea proved more effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea improved wheat grain yield relative to salicylic acid and control.

Treatment
Thioureae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
3.96 and 17.36%e0
Comparator
salicylic acid and controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thiourea application improved grain yield by 3.96 and 17.36%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1158 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to salicylic acid and control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea improved wheat biological yield relative to salicylic acid and control.

Treatment
Thioureae1
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
improvede1
Value
4.21 and 14.82%e0
Comparator
salicylic acid and controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biological yield by 4.21 and 14.82%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1195 · show in text ↑
e1

“Thiourea application improved grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1139 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to salicylic acid and control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea improved effective tiller number relative to salicylic acid and control.

Treatment
Thioureae1
Outcome
effective no. of tillerse0
Direction
improvede1
Value
3.77 and 11.91%e0
Comparator
salicylic acid and controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effective no. of tillers by 3.77 and 11.91%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1240 · show in text ↑
e1

“Thiourea application improved grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1139 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to salicylic acid and control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea improved wheat spike weight relative to salicylic acid and control.

Treatment
Thioureae1
Outcome
weight/spikee0
Direction
improvede1
Value
2.83 and 15.17%e0
Comparator
salicylic acid and controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weight/spike by 2.83 and 15.17%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1273 · show in text ↑
e1

“Thiourea application improved grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1139 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to salicylic acid and control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea improved wheat thousand-grain weight relative to salicylic acid and control.

Treatment
Thioureae1
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
improvede1
Value
3.72 and 12.66%e0
Comparator
salicylic acid and controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1000-grain weight by 3.72 and 12.66%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1311 · show in text ↑
e1

“Thiourea application improved grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1139 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to salicylic acid and control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea improved wheat specific weight relative to salicylic acid and control.

Treatment
Thioureae1
Outcome
specific weighte0
Direction
improvede1
Value
2.04 and 8.84%e0
Comparator
salicylic acid and controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“specific weight by 2.04 and 8.84%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1349 · show in text ↑
e1

“Thiourea application improved grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1139 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to salicylic acid and control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–93 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea and salicylic acid were recommended over control for wheat under saline water stress.

Treatment
thiourea and salicylic acid applicatione0
Outcome
better as compared to controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thiourea and salicylic acid application in wheat found better as compared to control under saline water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1647 · show in text ↑

thiourea · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

thiourea · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

salicylic acid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

104 papers: 95 positive, 9 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.