Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Oxidative stress and antioxidant metabolites in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties during grain development under water deficit conditions

Dommalapati Sudhakara Rao; Midathala Raghavendra; Parveen Gill; et al.

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties viz. WH 1105 and WH 1025 are subjected to drought stress. The non enzymatic antioxidant defense system which contains antioxidant metabolites such as ascorbic acid, glutathione and carotenoids contents were studied in drought sensitive and drought resistant varieties days after anthesis (DAA) in leaf and grain samples. As part of protective mechanism against drought, wheat plants produced more of ascorbic acid and glutathione with a concomitant decrease in carotenoid content. The increase in ascorbic acid and glutathione were more in WH 1025 than WH 1105. Carotenoids protect plants by minimizing ROS formation by quenching oxygen. The reduction in carotenoid content was observed in both wheat varieties days after anthesis (DAA) in leaf and grain samples but more reduction was observed in WH 1105 which is a drought sensitive variety of wheat. These antioxidant metabolites played a key role in protecting wheat plants against reactive oxygen species (ROS) mediated oxidative damage and their redox buffering capacity generates stress tolerance in drought tolerant wheat variety WH 1025.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat ascorbic acid increased under drought.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As part of protective mechanism against drought, wheat plants produced more of ascorbic acid and glutathione with a concomitant decrease in carotenoid content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat glutathione increased under drought.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
glutathionee0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As part of protective mechanism against drought, wheat plants produced more of ascorbic acid and glutathione with a concomitant decrease in carotenoid content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat carotenoid content decreased under drought.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
carotenoid contente0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As part of protective mechanism against drought, wheat plants produced more of ascorbic acid and glutathione with a concomitant decrease in carotenoid content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–523 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid increased more in WH 1025 than WH 1105.

Material
WH 1025e0
Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
WH 1105e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in ascorbic acid and glutathione were more in WH 1025 than WH 1105.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–604 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glutathione increased more in WH 1025 than WH 1105.

Material
WH 1025e0
Outcome
glutathionee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
WH 1105e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in ascorbic acid and glutathione were more in WH 1025 than WH 1105.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–604 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carotenoid content fell more in drought-sensitive WH 1105 than in WH 1025.

Material
WH 1105e0
Organ / stage
leaf and graine0
Outcome
carotenoid contente0
Direction
more reductione0
Qualifier
days after anthesis (DAA)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in carotenoid content was observed in both wheat varieties days after anthesis (DAA) in leaf and grain samples but more reduction was observed in WH 1105 which is a drought sensitive variety of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–895 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attribute drought tolerance in WH 1025 to antioxidant protection and redox buffering.

Material
WH 1025e0
Outcome
stress tolerancee0
Qualifier
redox buffering capacitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These antioxidant metabolites played a key role in protecting wheat plants against reactive oxygen species (ROS) mediated oxidative damage and their redox buffering capacity generates stress tolerance in drought tolerant wheat variety WH 1025.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1139 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

25 papers: 13 positive, 12 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

drought · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 56 positive, 69 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 16 positive, 115 negative or no effect

114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.