Paper · 2020 · Sustainability

Exopolysaccharides Producing Bacteria for the Amelioration of Drought Stress in Wheat

Noshin Ilyas; Komal Mumtaz; Nosheen Akhtar; et al.

16
claims
48
verbatim quotes
235
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This research was designed to elucidate the role of exopolysaccharides (EPS) producing bacterial strains for the amelioration of drought stress in wheat. Bacterial strains were isolated from a farmer’s field in the arid region of Pakistan. Out of 24 isolated stains, two bacterial strains, Bacillus subtilis (Accession No. MT742976) and Azospirillum brasilense (Accession No. MT742977) were selected, based on their ability to produce EPS and withstand drought stress. Both bacterial strains produced a good amount of EPS and osmolytes and exhibited drought tolerance individually, however, a combination of these strains produced higher amounts of EPS (sugar 6976 µg/g, 731.5 µg/g protein, and 1.1 mg/g uronic acid) and osmolytes (proline 4.4 µg/mg and sugar 79 µg/mg) and significantly changed the level of stress-induced phytohormones (61%, 49% and 30% decrease in Indole Acetic Acid (IAA), Gibberellic Acid (GA), and Cytokinin (CK)) respectively under stress, but an increase of 27.3% in Abscisic acid (ABA) concentration was observed. When inoculated, the combination of these strains improved seed germination, seedling vigor index, and promptness index by 18.2%, 23.7%, and 61.5% respectively under osmotic stress (20% polyethylene glycol, PEG6000). They also promoted plant growth in a pot experiment with an increase of 42.9%, 29.8%, and 33.7% in shoot length, root length, and leaf area, respectively. Physiological attributes of plants were also improved by bacterial inoculation showing an increase of 39.8%, 61.5%, and 45% in chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoid content respectively, as compared to control. Inoculations of bacterial strains also increased the production of osmolytes such asproline, amino acid, sugar, and protein by 30%, 23%, 68%, and 21.7% respectively. Co-inoculation of these strains enhanced the production of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) by 35.1%, catalase (CAT) by 77.4%, and peroxidase (POD) by 40.7%. Findings of the present research demonstrated that EPS, osmolyte, stress hormones, and antioxidant enzyme-producing bacterial strains impart drought tolerance in wheat and improve its growth, morphological attributes, physiological parameters, osmolytes production, and increase antioxidant enzymes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased wheat seed germination by 18.2%.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilise1
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
improvede0
Value
18.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · Second interactorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved seed germination, seedling vigor index, and promptness index by 18.2%, 23.7%, and 61.5% respectively under osmotic stress (20% polyethylene glycol, PEG6000)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1255 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus subtilis (Accession No. MT742976) and Azospirillum brasilense (Accession No. MT742977)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased wheat seedling vigor index by 23.7%.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilise1
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
seedling vigor indexe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
23.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · Second interactorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved seed germination, seedling vigor index, and promptness index by 18.2%, 23.7%, and 61.5% respectively under osmotic stress (20% polyethylene glycol, PEG6000)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1255 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus subtilis (Accession No. MT742976) and Azospirillum brasilense (Accession No. MT742977)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased wheat promptness index by 61.5%.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilise1
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
promptness indexe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
61.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · Second interactorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved seed germination, seedling vigor index, and promptness index by 18.2%, 23.7%, and 61.5% respectively under osmotic stress (20% polyethylene glycol, PEG6000)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1255 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus subtilis (Accession No. MT742976) and Azospirillum brasilense (Accession No. MT742977)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased wheat shoot length by 42.9%.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilise1
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
42.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · Second interactorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase of 42.9%, 29.8%, and 33.7% in shoot length, root length, and leaf area, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1410 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus subtilis (Accession No. MT742976) and Azospirillum brasilense (Accession No. MT742977)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased wheat root length by 29.8%.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilise1
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
29.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · Second interactorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase of 42.9%, 29.8%, and 33.7% in shoot length, root length, and leaf area, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1410 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus subtilis (Accession No. MT742976) and Azospirillum brasilense (Accession No. MT742977)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased wheat leaf area by 33.7%.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilise1
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
increasee0
Value
33.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · Second interactorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase of 42.9%, 29.8%, and 33.7% in shoot length, root length, and leaf area, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1410 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus subtilis (Accession No. MT742976) and Azospirillum brasilense (Accession No. MT742977)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased wheat chlorophyll a by 39.8%.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilise1
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll ae0
Direction
increasee0
Value
39.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · Second interactorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase of 39.8%, 61.5%, and 45% in chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoid content respectively, as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1628 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus subtilis (Accession No. MT742976) and Azospirillum brasilense (Accession No. MT742977)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased wheat chlorophyll b by 61.5%.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilise1
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll be0
Direction
increasee0
Value
61.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · Second interactorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase of 39.8%, 61.5%, and 45% in chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoid content respectively, as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1628 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus subtilis (Accession No. MT742976) and Azospirillum brasilense (Accession No. MT742977)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased wheat carotenoid content by 45%.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilise1
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
carotenoid contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · Second interactorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase of 39.8%, 61.5%, and 45% in chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoid content respectively, as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1628 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus subtilis (Accession No. MT742976) and Azospirillum brasilense (Accession No. MT742977)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased wheat proline by 30%.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilise1
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
prolinee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · Second interactorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased the production of osmolytes such asproline, amino acid, sugar, and protein by 30%, 23%, 68%, and 21.7% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1669–1794 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus subtilis (Accession No. MT742976) and Azospirillum brasilense (Accession No. MT742977)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased wheat amino acid by 23%.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilise1
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
amino acide0
Direction
increasede0
Value
23%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · Second interactorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased the production of osmolytes such asproline, amino acid, sugar, and protein by 30%, 23%, 68%, and 21.7% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1669–1794 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus subtilis (Accession No. MT742976) and Azospirillum brasilense (Accession No. MT742977)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased wheat sugar by 68%.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilise1
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
sugare0
Direction
increasede0
Value
68%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · Second interactorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased the production of osmolytes such asproline, amino acid, sugar, and protein by 30%, 23%, 68%, and 21.7% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1669–1794 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus subtilis (Accession No. MT742976) and Azospirillum brasilense (Accession No. MT742977)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased wheat protein by 21.7%.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilise1
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
proteine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · Second interactorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased the production of osmolytes such asproline, amino acid, sugar, and protein by 30%, 23%, 68%, and 21.7% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1669–1794 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus subtilis (Accession No. MT742976) and Azospirillum brasilense (Accession No. MT742977)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased wheat superoxide dismutase (SOD) by 35.1%.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilise1
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
superoxide dismutase (SOD)e0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
35.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · Second interactorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced the production of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) by 35.1%, catalase (CAT) by 77.4%, and peroxidase (POD) by 40.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1828–1974 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus subtilis (Accession No. MT742976) and Azospirillum brasilense (Accession No. MT742977)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased wheat catalase (CAT) by 77.4%.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilise1
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
catalase (CAT)e0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
77.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · Second interactorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced the production of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) by 35.1%, catalase (CAT) by 77.4%, and peroxidase (POD) by 40.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1828–1974 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus subtilis (Accession No. MT742976) and Azospirillum brasilense (Accession No. MT742977)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased wheat peroxidase (POD) by 40.7%.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilise1
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
peroxidase (POD)e0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
40.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · Second interactorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced the production of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) by 35.1%, catalase (CAT) by 77.4%, and peroxidase (POD) by 40.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1828–1974 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus subtilis (Accession No. MT742976) and Azospirillum brasilense (Accession No. MT742977)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

39 papers: 39 positive, 0 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.