Paper · 2009 · Journal of Plant Production

RESPONSE OF MAIZE AND ASSOCIATED WEEDS TO IRRIGATION INTERVALS, WEED MANAGEMENT AND NITROGEN FORMS

I. EL-Metwally; H. Saudy; Soad El-Ashry

13
claims
22
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted during the 2005 and 2006 growing seasons at the Experimental Farm of the National Research Centre at Shalakan, Kalubia Governorate, Egypt, to study the response of maize yield and its components and associated weeds to two irrigation intervals (every 2 and 3 weeks), three weed management treatments (metribuzin herbicide, hoeing twice at 25 and 40 days from sowing and weedy check) and four N forms (ammonium sulfate, ammonium nitrate, urea and calcium nitrate). Results showed that irrigation every 2 weeks significantly decreased grassy and total weeds and NK uptake by weeds. Providing maize plants by irrigation every 2 weeks significantly increased chlorophyll a leaf content, yield and its components, grain P content and protein yield/fed. Hoeing twice was more effective than metribuzin herbicide for controlling grassy and total weeds and lowering N, P and K uptake by weeds. Application of metribuzin markedly increased chlorophyll a leaf content, while hoeing twice was the effective treatment for increasing yield and its components, except ear diameter, and enhanced grain N content, protein % and protein yield/fed. Calcium nitrate significantly decreased dry weight of grassy and total weeds and NK uptake by weeds. Adding ammonium nitrate markedly increased chlorophyll a leaf content, number of rows/ear, 100-kernel weight and grain yield/fed. Irrigation every 2 weeks with metribuzin treatment gave the maximum values of 100-kernel weight, ear yield and grain yield /fed when ammonium nitrate as nitrogen form was used.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every two weeks significantly decreased grassy and total weeds and their N and K uptake.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Treatment
irrigation every 2 weekse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
grassy and total weeds and NK uptake by weedse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation every 2 weeks significantly decreased grassy and total weeds and NK uptake by weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE AND ASSOCIATED WEEDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every two weeks significantly increased maize leaf chlorophyll a.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
irrigation every 2 weekse0
Outcome
chlorophyll a leaf contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Providing maize plants by irrigation every 2 weeks significantly increased chlorophyll a leaf content, yield and its components, grain P content and protein yield/fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every two weeks significantly increased maize yield and its components.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
irrigation every 2 weekse0
Outcome
yield and its componentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Providing maize plants by irrigation every 2 weeks significantly increased chlorophyll a leaf content, yield and its components, grain P content and protein yield/fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every two weeks significantly increased maize grain P content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
irrigation every 2 weekse0
Outcome
grain P contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Providing maize plants by irrigation every 2 weeks significantly increased chlorophyll a leaf content, yield and its components, grain P content and protein yield/fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every two weeks significantly increased maize protein yield per feddan.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
irrigation every 2 weekse0
Outcome
protein yield/fede0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Providing maize plants by irrigation every 2 weeks significantly increased chlorophyll a leaf content, yield and its components, grain P content and protein yield/fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hoeing twice controlled grassy and total weeds more effectively than metribuzin and lowered weed N, P and K uptake.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Treatment
Hoeing twicee0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
grassy and total weeds and lowering N, P and K uptake by weedse0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
metribuzin herbicidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hoeing twice was more effective than metribuzin herbicide for controlling grassy and total weeds and lowering N, P and K uptake by weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE AND ASSOCIATED WEEDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin markedly increased maize leaf chlorophyll a.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Treatment
metribuzine0
Outcome
chlorophyll a leaf contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of metribuzin markedly increased chlorophyll a leaf content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hoeing twice increased maize yield and yield components except ear diameter.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Treatment
hoeing twicee0
Outcome
yield and its componentse0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
except ear diametere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hoeing twice was the effective treatment for increasing yield and its components, except ear diameter, and enhanced grain N content, protein % and protein yield/fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hoeing twice enhanced grain N content and protein percentage and yield.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Treatment
hoeing twicee0
Outcome
grain N content, protein % and protein yield/fede0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hoeing twice was the effective treatment for increasing yield and its components, except ear diameter, and enhanced grain N content, protein % and protein yield/fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate significantly decreased grassy and total weed dry weight and weed N and K uptake.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Treatment
Calcium nitratee0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
dry weight of grassy and total weeds and NK uptake by weedse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium nitrate significantly decreased dry weight of grassy and total weeds and NK uptake by weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate markedly increased leaf chlorophyll a content.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Treatment
ammonium nitratee0
Outcome
chlorophyll a leaf contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adding ammonium nitrate markedly increased chlorophyll a leaf content, number of rows/ear, 100-kernel weight and grain yield/fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1398 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate markedly increased rows per ear, 100-kernel weight and grain yield per feddan.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Treatment
ammonium nitratee0
Outcome
number of rows/ear, 100-kernel weight and grain yield/fede0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adding ammonium nitrate markedly increased chlorophyll a leaf content, number of rows/ear, 100-kernel weight and grain yield/fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1398 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of two-week irrigation, metribuzin and ammonium nitrate gave maximum 100-kernel weight, ear yield and grain yield.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Treatment
Irrigation every 2 weeks with metribuzin treatmente0
Outcome
100-kernel weight, ear yield and grain yield /fede0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
ammonium nitrate as nitrogen forme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation every 2 weeks with metribuzin treatment gave the maximum values of 100-kernel weight, ear yield and grain yield /fed when ammonium nitrate as nitrogen form was used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1575 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑

metribuzin · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

metribuzin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

ammonium nitrate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

ammonium nitrate · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

39 papers: 25 positive, 14 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

irrigation · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 28 positive, 15 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

104 papers: 84 positive, 20 negative or no effect

83 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.