Paper · 2020 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Shading tolerance of some rice genotypes under the artificial shade net

A P Lestari; A Hairmansis; E S Mulyaningsih; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Deficit light led to the reduction of photosynthesis and carbohydrate synthesis for upland rice plants in the plantation area. This experiment aimed to screen some germplasm rice shade-tolerant levels, local rice varieties, and high yielding rice and promising lines further generations. The experiment was conducted at Muara Experimental Farm, Bogor starting in April 2017. A total of ± 200 rice lines and comparative varieties, i.e, Jatiluhur, Rindang 1, Rindang 2, IR64, Inpago 5, and Kalimutu, were tested below paranet ± 60% light interception and without shading as control. The augmented design was used as an experiment design with four replications for the check varieties. Result showed that light intensity affected the growth and development of plant rice lines. There were 23 lines detected as tolerant and 11 lines as moderate of 200 tested lines. The plant height in shade and control areas was not different, whereas the number of tillers in gogo shade had a much less amount than in control treatment. The flowering phase at shade caused a decrease in the formation rate of the flowering phase in rice lines. Therefore, the flowering age became longer without shade. Leaf chlorophyll content of lines in the shade treatment was lower than in control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-three rice lines were shade tolerant.

Outcome
tolerante0
Value
23 linese0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were 23 lines detected as tolerant and 11 lines as moderate of 200 tested lines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eleven rice lines had moderate shade tolerance.

Outcome
moderatee0
Value
11 linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were 23 lines detected as tolerant and 11 lines as moderate of 200 tested lines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice plant height was similar in shade and control areas.

Treatment
shadee0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
not differente0
Comparator
control arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant height in shade and control areas was not different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice had fewer tillers in shade than in the control.

Treatment
shadee0
Outcome
number of tillerse0
Direction
much lesse0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of tillers in gogo shade had a much less amount than in control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade reduced the rate of flowering phase formation in rice lines.

Treatment
shadee0
Outcome
formation rate of the flowering phasee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The flowering phase at shade caused a decrease in the formation rate of the flowering phase in rice lines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering age was longer without shade.

Treatment
without shadee0
Outcome
flowering agee0
Direction
longere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, the flowering age became longer without shade.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade lowered leaf chlorophyll content relative to control.

Treatment
shade treatmente0
Outcome
Leaf chlorophyll contente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf chlorophyll content of lines in the shade treatment was lower than in control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑

shade · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

shade · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

36 papers: 10 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

shade · phenology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

shade · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 15 positive, 56 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.