Paper · 2020 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

The effectiveness of foliar applications of different zinc source and urea to increase grain zinc of wheat grown under reduced soil nitrogen supply

Shaoxia Wang; Ninghui Sun; Shuo Yang; et al.

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Nitrogen is important for the enrichment of grain Zn when Zn is foliarly applied. However, decreasing soil N input has become a major issue for environmental protection. A 2-yr field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of spraying different Zn sources [ZnSO4 or Zn(Gly)2] combined with or without urea on grain Zn concentration and bioavailability under reduced soil N rates, both in single wheat plantation and winter wheat-summer maize rotation. Results showed that foliar application of Zn(Gly)2 significantly increased grain Zn concentration by 88% under wheat-summer maize rotation and 150% under single wheat plantation. The effectiveness of foliar ZnSO4 application in increasing grain Zn was similar with that of Zn(Gly)2. Adding urea to foliar ZnSO4 or Zn(Gly)2 further increased grain Zn concentration under reduced soil N rates. Grain Zn biavailability increased with the reduction of soil N rates, but decreased after application of foliar Zn fertilizers. Foliar fertilization significantly increased protein, Fe, and Mn concentrations in grain, and the magnitudes of these increases were greater when Zn(Gly)2 alone or ZnSO4 plus urea were applied. Simultaneous foliar application of ZnSO4 and urea slightly increased farmer’s net income. These results suggest that foliar application of ZnSO4 plus urea can be used as efficient and economical fertilization strategies to increase Zn concentration and bioavailability in wheat grain under reduced soil N supply, and consequently minimize Zn deficiency in humans.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn(Gly)2 increased grain Zn concentration by 88% under wheat-summer maize rotation.

Treatment
foliar application of Zn(Gly)2e0
Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
88%e0
Setting
wheat-summer maize rotatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of Zn(Gly)2 significantly increased grain Zn concentration by 88% under wheat-summer maize rotation and 150% under single wheat plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn(Gly)2 increased grain Zn concentration by 150% under single wheat plantation.

Treatment
foliar application of Zn(Gly)2e0
Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
150%e0
Setting
single wheat plantatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of Zn(Gly)2 significantly increased grain Zn concentration by 88% under wheat-summer maize rotation and 150% under single wheat plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ZnSO4 was similar to Zn(Gly)2 in increasing grain Zn.

Treatment
foliar ZnSO4e1
Outcome
in increasing grain Zne1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
Zn(Gly)2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effectiveness of foliar ZnSO4 application in increasing grain Zn was similar with that of Zn(Gly)2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–748 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar application of Zn(Gly)2 significantly increased grain Zn concentration by 88% under wheat-summer maize rotation and 150% under single wheat plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding urea to foliar ZnSO4 or Zn(Gly)2 further increased grain Zn concentration under reduced soil N rates.

Treatment
Adding urea to foliar ZnSO4 or Zn(Gly)2e2
Outcome
grain Zn concentratione2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
under reduced soil N ratese2
Comparator
foliar ZnSO4 or Zn(Gly)2e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Adding urea to foliar ZnSO4 or Zn(Gly)2 further increased grain Zn concentration under reduced soil N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–857 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar application of Zn(Gly)2 significantly increased grain Zn concentration by 88% under wheat-summer maize rotation and 150% under single wheat plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain Zn bioavailability increased as soil N rates were reduced.

Treatment
reduction of soil N ratese3
Outcome
Grain Zn biavailabilitye3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Grain Zn biavailability increased with the reduction of soil N rates, but decreased after application of foliar Zn fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–985 · show in text ↑
e6

“to increase Zn concentration and bioavailability in wheat grain under reduced soil N supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain Zn bioavailability decreased after foliar Zn fertilizer application.

Treatment
application of foliar Zn fertilizerse3
Outcome
Grain Zn biavailabilitye3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Grain Zn biavailability increased with the reduction of soil N rates, but decreased after application of foliar Zn fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–985 · show in text ↑
e6

“to increase Zn concentration and bioavailability in wheat grain under reduced soil N supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilization significantly increased grain protein, Fe and Mn concentrations.

Treatment
Foliar fertilizatione4
Outcome
protein, Fe, and Mn concentrations in graine4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Foliar fertilization significantly increased protein, Fe, and Mn concentrations in grain, and the magnitudes of these increases were greater when Zn(Gly)2 alone or ZnSO4 plus urea were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1179 · show in text ↑
e6

“to increase Zn concentration and bioavailability in wheat grain under reduced soil N supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The increases in protein, Fe and Mn were greater with Zn(Gly)2 alone or ZnSO4 plus urea.

Treatment
Zn(Gly)2 alone or ZnSO4 plus ureae4
Outcome
magnitudes of these increasese4
Direction
greatere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Foliar fertilization significantly increased protein, Fe, and Mn concentrations in grain, and the magnitudes of these increases were greater when Zn(Gly)2 alone or ZnSO4 plus urea were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1179 · show in text ↑
e6

“to increase Zn concentration and bioavailability in wheat grain under reduced soil N supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneous foliar ZnSO4 and urea slightly increased farmers’ net income.

Treatment
Simultaneous foliar application of ZnSO4 and ureae5
Outcome
farmer’s net incomee5
Direction
increasede5
Qualifier
slightlye5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Simultaneous foliar application of ZnSO4 and urea slightly increased farmer’s net income”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1269 · show in text ↑
e6

“to increase Zn concentration and bioavailability in wheat grain under reduced soil N supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1492 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ZnSO4 plus urea is suggested as an efficient and economical strategy to raise wheat grain Zn concentration and bioavailability under reduced soil N, and consequently minimize human Zn deficiency.

Treatment
foliar application of ZnSO4 plus ureae6
Outcome
Zn concentration and bioavailability in wheat graine6
Qualifier
consequently minimize Zn deficiency in humanse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“These results suggest that foliar application of ZnSO4 plus urea can be used as efficient and economical fertilization strategies to increase Zn concentration and bioavailability in wheat grain under reduced soil N supply, and consequently minimize Zn deficiency in humans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1543 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

glycylglycine · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

479 papers: 410 positive, 69 negative or no effect

409 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

475 papers more in this group

See all 479 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.