Paper · 2020 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Zinc–nitrogen interaction effect on wheat biofortification and nutrient use efficiency

Mónica Montoya; Antonio Vallejo; Jaime Recio; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Background : The enhancement of zinc (Zn) concentration in cereal crops without compromising yield is a global challenge with crucial health and food security implications. Aims : To achieve Zn biofortification in wheat through the appropriate management of fertilization with both Zn and nitrogen (N), due to the synergistic effect between them, using natural organic sources of Zn. Methods : We carried out a field experiment using a rainfed winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) crop fertilized with four Zn sources (Zn‐sulphate, Zn‐lignosulphonate, Zn‐amino acids and Zn‐gluconate) and three N application rates under semi‐arid conditions. Results : The strategy of increasing the N rate by 50% with respect to the recommended N rate ( i.e ., 120 kg N ha −1 ) did not improve either wheat yield or grain Zn‐N concentration. The combined effect of applying natural organic Zn complexes and the recommended N rate tended to increase grain Zn concentrations (by an average of 14%), although this increase was significantly higher when Zn‐sulphate was applied (63%) due to its higher recommended Zn application rate. Natural organic Zn fertilizers achieved the highest grain yields, probably due to the enhancement of N uptake. The natural organic Zn fertilizers resulted in higher Zn utilization efficiency compared with the Zn‐sulphate fertilizer. Conclusions : In calcareous Zn‐deficient soils, our results suggest that Zn–N co‐fertilization involving Zn‐sulphate combined with the recommended N application rate would be advisable for obtaining grain Zn biofortification, while the highest yields can be obtained with the application of natural organic Zn fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen by 50% over the recommended rate did not improve wheat yield.

Treatment
increasing the N rate by 50%e0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
did not improvee0
Comparator
recommended N ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The strategy of increasing the N rate by 50% with respect to the recommended N rate ( i.e ., 120 kg N ha −1 ) did not improve either wheat yield or grain Zn‐N concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–834 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen by 50% over the recommended rate did not improve grain Zn‐N concentration.

Treatment
increasing the N rate by 50%e0
Outcome
grain Zn‐N concentratione0
Direction
did not improvee0
Comparator
recommended N ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The strategy of increasing the N rate by 50% with respect to the recommended N rate ( i.e ., 120 kg N ha −1 ) did not improve either wheat yield or grain Zn‐N concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–834 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural organic Zn complexes with recommended N tended to raise grain Zn concentration by 14% on average.

Treatment
natural organic Zn complexes and the recommended N ratee0
Outcome
grain Zn concentrationse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
14%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined effect of applying natural organic Zn complexes and the recommended N rate tended to increase grain Zn concentrations (by an average of 14%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn‐sulphate raised grain Zn concentration by 63% and exceeded the organic complexes.

Treatment
Zn‐sulphatee0
Outcome
grain Zn concentrationse1
Direction
highere0
Value
63%e0
Comparator
natural organic Zn complexese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this increase was significantly higher when Zn‐sulphate was applied (63%) due to its higher recommended Zn application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“natural organic Zn complexes and the recommended N rate tended to increase grain Zn concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural organic Zn fertilizers achieved the highest grain yields.

Treatment
Natural organic Zn fertilizerse0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Natural organic Zn fertilizers achieved the highest grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1189 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher grain yield with organic Zn fertilizers was attributed tentatively to enhanced N uptake.

Treatment
Natural organic Zn fertilizerse0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Qualifier
enhancement of N uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Natural organic Zn fertilizers achieved the highest grain yields, probably due to the enhancement of N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1234 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural organic Zn fertilizers produced higher Zn utilization efficiency than Zn‐sulphate.

Treatment
natural organic Zn fertilizerse0
Outcome
Zn utilization efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Zn‐sulphate fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The natural organic Zn fertilizers resulted in higher Zn utilization efficiency compared with the Zn‐sulphate fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1356 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Zn‐sulphate with recommended N was advised for grain zinc biofortification in calcareous Zn‐deficient soils.

Outcome
Zn–N co‐fertilization involving Zn‐sulphate combined with the recommended N application ratee0
Setting
calcareous Zn‐deficient soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In calcareous Zn‐deficient soils, our results suggest that Zn–N co‐fertilization involving Zn‐sulphate combined with the recommended N application rate would be advisable for obtaining grain Zn biofortification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1582 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Organic Zn fertilizers were advised for highest wheat yields.

Outcome
application of natural organic Zn fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while the highest yields can be obtained with the application of natural organic Zn fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1679 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 114 positive, 52 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 114 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    N deficiency slowed grain N accumulation.

    Co-ordinated expression of amino acid metabolism in response to N and S deficiency during wheat grain filling · 2008

    No difference from an alternativeAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  2. positive
  3. positive

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

479 papers: 410 positive, 69 negative or no effect

409 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

475 papers more in this group

See all 479 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.