Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The highest grain yield was 646 g/m2 under 5% zinc spray, grain-filling irrigation and normal nitrogen.

A claim from Enhancing Grain Yield and Zinc Content in Bread Wheat Using Zinc and Nitrogen Application under Supplementary Irrigation Treatments · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest grain yield was 646 g/m2 under 5% zinc spray, grain-filling irrigation and normal nitrogen.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
spraying Zn at 5% concentration supplemented with irrigation at the grain filling stage with normal N applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
646 g/m2e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield (646 g/m2 ) and Zn concentration (32.69%) observed in spraying Zn at 5% concentration supplemented with irrigation at the grain filling stage with normal N application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1149
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–53

Title

Enhancing Grain Yield and Zinc Content in Bread Wheat Using Zinc and Nitrogen Application under Supplementary Irrigation Treatments

Hossein Vaziri; Mohammad Reza Dadashi; Hossein Ajamnorozi; et al. Romanian Agricultural Research 2023. doi:10.59665/rar4037

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-bd0f4bc2fec3e3f37df03a8c2392916079ef368cf53906254cae05c80093ca30 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. no effect

502 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this claim · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

868 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.