Paper · 2015 · International Journal of Biosciences (IJB)

The effect of foliar application of zinc (Zn) on yield and yield components of irrigated wheat cultivars in ahvaz weather conditions

13
claims
13
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Lack of access to the soil zinc particularly in calcareous areas with high PH is one of the factors reducing the wheat yield. Therefore, in order to investigate the effect of zinc (Zn) on the growth, yield, and yield components of three wheat cultivars, a split plot experiment in the form of randomized complete block design with three replications was carried out in Hamidiyeh, Ahvaz in 2011-2012. The main plot consisted of foliar application of four levels of zinc fertilizer at stem elongation stage including (without zinc consumption, 0.001 zinc per hectare, 0.003 zinc per hectare, 0.005 zinc per hectare) and the sub plot included three irrigated wheat cultivars (Chamran, Falat, Star). The results indicated that the studied wheat cultivars were significantly different in terms of grain yield at 5% probability level. Chamran cultivar had the highest number of spike per area unit, number of grains per spike, number of spikelet per spike, 1000-grain weight, and consequently the highest grain yield by 4740.83 kg/ha and the lowest grain yield belonged to the Star cultivar by 3700.83 kg/ha. The effect of foliar application of zinc fertilizer on the grain yield was not significant. However, application of 0.005 zinc per hectare (412 kg/ha) increased the grain yield in comparison to the control treatment. Furthermore, the foliar application of zinc had a significant effect on protein percentage and zinc concentration in grain at 1% level. The wheat cultivars were significantly different in terms of the grain zinc concentration at 1% level. The highest and the lowest concentrations of grain zinc respectively belonged to Chamran and Star cultivars. It seems that foliar application of zinc fertilizer had an effective role in increasing the concentration of grain zinc which was followed by the increase of grain yield. Moreover, wheat cultivars had different reactions to the foliar application of zinc and the cultivars with positive reaction to zinc can be used in lands with zinc deficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat cultivars differed significantly in grain yield.

Material
wheat cultivarse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
5% probability levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat cultivars were significantly different in terms of grain yield at 5% probability level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–827 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chamran had the highest spike number, grains per spike, spikelets per spike, and 1000-grain weight.

Material
Chamrane0
Outcome
number of spike per area unit, number of grains per spike, number of spikelet per spike, 1000-grain weighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Chamran cultivar had the highest number of spike per area unit, number of grains per spike, number of spikelet per spike, 1000-grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–968 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chamran had the highest grain yield of 4740.83 kg/ha.

Material
Chamrane0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4740.83 kg/hae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Chamran cultivar had the highest number of spike per area unit, number of grains per spike, number of spikelet per spike, 1000-grain weight, and consequently the highest grain yield by 4740.83 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–1027 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Star had the lowest grain yield of 3700.83 kg/ha.

Material
Stare0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
3700.83 kg/hae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest grain yield belonged to the Star cultivar by 3700.83 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc had no significant effect on grain yield.

Treatment
foliar application of zinc fertilizere0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of foliar application of zinc fertilizer on the grain yield was not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1194 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 0.005 zinc per hectare increased grain yield versus control.

Treatment
application of 0.005 zinc per hectaree0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
412 kg/hae0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“application of 0.005 zinc per hectare (412 kg/ha) increased the grain yield in comparison to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1318 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc significantly affected grain protein percentage and zinc concentration.

Treatment
foliar application of zince0
Outcome
protein percentage and zinc concentration in graine0
Value
1% levele0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of zinc had a significant effect on protein percentage and zinc concentration in grain at 1% level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1454 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat cultivars differed significantly in grain zinc concentration.

Material
wheat cultivarse0
Outcome
grain zinc concentratione0
Value
1% levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wheat cultivars were significantly different in terms of the grain zinc concentration at 1% level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1558 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chamran had the highest grain zinc concentration.

Material
Chamrane0
Outcome
concentrations of grain zince0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The highest and the lowest concentrations of grain zinc respectively belonged to Chamran and Star cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1667 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Star had the lowest grain zinc concentration.

Material
Stare0
Outcome
concentrations of grain zince0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The highest and the lowest concentrations of grain zinc respectively belonged to Chamran and Star cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1667 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpret foliar zinc as increasing grain zinc concentration and then grain yield.

Treatment
foliar application of zinc fertilizere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
increasing the concentration of grain zince0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of zinc fertilizer had an effective role in increasing the concentration of grain zinc which was followed by the increase of grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1682–1837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat cultivars reacted differently to foliar zinc.

Treatment
foliar application of zince0
Outcome
different reactionse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat cultivars had different reactions to the foliar application of zinc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1849–1922 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend zinc responsive cultivars for zinc deficient land.

Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
can be used in lands with zinc deficiencye0
Setting
lands with zinc deficiencye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“cultivars with positive reaction to zinc can be used in lands with zinc deficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1931–2013 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.