Paper · 2020 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Difference Between Day and Night Temperatures Affects Stem Elongation in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Seedlings via Regulation of Gibberellin and Auxin Synthesis

Kinuka Ohtaka; Akiko Yoshida; Yusuke Kakei; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
64
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Temperature is a critical environmental factor governing plant growth and development. The difference between day temperature (DT) and night temperature (NT), abbreviated as DIF, influences plant architecture. Subjecting plants to artificial DIF treatments is an effective strategy in ornamental horticulture. For example, negative DIF (when DT – NT < 0) generally inhibits stem elongation, resulting in dwarf plants. However, the mechanisms underlying stem growth regulation by DIF remains to be completely elucidated. In this study, we aimed to analyze the growth, transcriptome, and phytohormone profiles of tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) seedlings grown under different DIF treatments. Under positive DIF (when DT – NT > 0), in contrast to the control temperature (25°C/20°C, DT/NT), high temperature (30°C/25°C) increased stem length and thickness, as well as the number of xylem vessels. Conversely, compared with the positive high temperature DIF treatment (30°C/25°C), under negative DIF treatment (25°C/30°C) stem elongation was inhibited, but stem thickness and the number of xylem vessels were not affected. The negative DIF treatment decreased the expression of gibberellin (GA)-, auxin-, and cell wall-related genes in the epicotyl, as well as the concentrations of GAs and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). The expression of these genes and concentrations of these hormones increased under high temperature compared to those under the control temperature positive DIF. Our results suggest that stem length in tomato seedlings is controlled by changes in GA and IAA biosynthesis in response to varying day and night temperatures.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High positive DIF increased stem length and thickness relative to control temperature.

Treatment
high temperature (30°C/25°C)e0
Outcome
stem length and thicknesse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control temperature (25°C/20°C, DT/NT)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in contrast to the control temperature (25°C/20°C, DT/NT), high temperature (30°C/25°C) increased stem length and thickness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High positive DIF increased xylem vessel number relative to control temperature.

Treatment
high temperature (30°C/25°C)e0
Outcome
number of xylem vesselse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control temperature (25°C/20°C, DT/NT)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in contrast to the control temperature (25°C/20°C, DT/NT), high temperature (30°C/25°C) increased stem length and thickness, as well as the number of xylem vessels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Negative DIF inhibited stem elongation relative to high positive DIF.

Treatment
negative DIF treatment (25°C/30°C)e0
Outcome
stem elongatione0
Direction
inhibitede0
Comparator
positive high temperature DIF treatment (30°C/25°C)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with the positive high temperature DIF treatment (30°C/25°C), under negative DIF treatment (25°C/30°C) stem elongation was inhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Negative DIF did not affect stem thickness or xylem vessel number relative to high positive DIF.

Treatment
negative DIF treatment (25°C/30°C)e0
Outcome
stem thickness and the number of xylem vesselse0
Direction
not affectede0
Comparator
positive high temperature DIF treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under negative DIF treatment (25°C/30°C) stem elongation was inhibited, but stem thickness and the number of xylem vessels were not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with the positive high temperature DIF treatment (30°C/25°C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–976 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Negative DIF decreased gibberellin, auxin and cell wall related gene expression in epicotyls.

Organ / stage
epicotyle0
Treatment
negative DIF treatmente0
Outcome
expression of gibberellin (GA)-, auxin-, and cell wall-related genese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negative DIF treatment decreased the expression of gibberellin (GA)-, auxin-, and cell wall-related genes in the epicotyl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Negative DIF decreased gibberellin and indole-3-acetic acid concentrations.

Treatment
negative DIF treatmente0
Outcome
concentrations of GAs and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negative DIF treatment decreased the expression of gibberellin (GA)-, auxin-, and cell wall-related genes in the epicotyl, as well as the concentrations of GAs and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1314 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature increased the expression of these genes relative to control temperature.

Treatment
high temperaturee0
Outcome
expression of these genese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control temperature positive DIFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The expression of these genes and concentrations of these hormones increased under high temperature compared to those under the control temperature positive DIF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1476 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature increased hormone concentrations relative to control temperature.

Treatment
high temperaturee0
Outcome
concentrations of these hormonese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control temperature positive DIFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The expression of these genes and concentrations of these hormones increased under high temperature compared to those under the control temperature positive DIF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1476 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest day-night temperature regulates tomato stem length through GA and IAA biosynthesis.

Outcome
stem lengthe0
Qualifier
changes in GA and IAA biosynthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem length in tomato seedlings is controlled by changes in GA and IAA biosynthesis in response to varying day and night temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1636 · show in text ↑

heat · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

81 papers: 26 positive, 55 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

heat · physiology: hormones · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

heat · molecular: expression · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 13 positive, 14 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.