Paper · 2020 · Agrokémia és Talajtan

Cseresznyefák terméshozását és gyümölcsminőségét befolyásoló műtrágya kísérletek eredményei

Ádám Csihon; István Gonda; Mihály Orosz-Tóth; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plant nutrition significantly influences yield and fruit quality in fruit orchards. In this three-year study (2016–2018), different fertilizer treatments were compared in an intensive sweet cherry orchard. Trees of cultivar ‘Carmen’ were grafted on Prunus mahaleb ‘ Cema’ rootstock, and were trained to free spindle. For NP, NPK and NPKMg treatments, yield ranged between 11.8 and 16.6 kg/tree in the three years, while the yield was 9.1 kg/tree on the control trees. Crop load (fruit amount calculated to the trunk thickness) was 151–166 g cm - 2 for fertilized trees, while it was 120 g cm - 2 on the untreated trees. Fruit sizes of fertilized trees reached 30 mm in 2018, while the fruit sizes of control trees were smaller with 2.5 mm. Water-soluble dry matter content (%) of the fertilized trees was lower in 2016 and 2017, but higher in 2018 compared to the control plots. In 2017 and 2018, fertilizer treatments resulted in an increase of the content of phosphorus (16–70%), potassium (4–22%) and magnesium (12–43%) in the fruits compared to control plots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP, NPK and NPKMg fertilizer treatments gave higher yield than control trees.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Treatment
NP, NPK and NPKMg treatmentse1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
11.8 and 16.6 kg/treee1
Comparator
control treese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this three-year study (2016–2018), different fertilizer treatments were compared in an intensive sweet cherry orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“For NP, NPK and NPKMg treatments, yield ranged between 11.8 and 16.6 kg/tree in the three years, while the yield was 9.1 kg/tree on the control trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilized sweet cherry trees had higher crop load than untreated trees.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Treatment
fertilized treese2
Outcome
Crop loade2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
151–166 g cm - 2e2
Comparator
untreated treese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this three-year study (2016–2018), different fertilizer treatments were compared in an intensive sweet cherry orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–204 · show in text ↑
e2

“Crop load (fruit amount calculated to the trunk thickness) was 151–166 g cm - 2 for fertilized trees, while it was 120 g cm - 2 on the untreated trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilized sweet cherry trees reached fruit size of 30 mm in 2018, larger than control trees.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Treatment
fertilized treese3
Outcome
fruit sizese3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
30 mme3
Comparator
control treese3
Setting
2018e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this three-year study (2016–2018), different fertilizer treatments were compared in an intensive sweet cherry orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–204 · show in text ↑
e3

“Fruit sizes of fertilized trees reached 30 mm in 2018, while the fruit sizes of control trees were smaller with 2.5 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–738 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-soluble dry matter content of fertilized sweet cherry fruit was lower in 2016 and 2017 than in control plots.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Treatment
fertilized treese4
Outcome
Water-soluble dry matter content (%)e4
Direction
lowere4
Comparator
control plotse4
Setting
2016 and 2017e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this three-year study (2016–2018), different fertilizer treatments were compared in an intensive sweet cherry orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–204 · show in text ↑
e4

“Water-soluble dry matter content (%) of the fertilized trees was lower in 2016 and 2017, but higher in 2018 compared to the control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-soluble dry matter content of fertilized sweet cherry fruit was higher in 2018 than in control plots.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Treatment
fertilized treese4
Outcome
Water-soluble dry matter content (%)e4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
control plotse4
Setting
2018e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this three-year study (2016–2018), different fertilizer treatments were compared in an intensive sweet cherry orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–204 · show in text ↑
e4

“Water-soluble dry matter content (%) of the fertilized trees was lower in 2016 and 2017, but higher in 2018 compared to the control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer treatments increased phosphorus content of sweet cherry fruit by 16–70% in 2017 and 2018.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Organ / stage
fruitse5
Treatment
fertilizer treatmentse5
Outcome
content of phosphoruse5
Direction
increasee5
Value
16–70%e5
Comparator
control plotse5
Setting
In 2017 and 2018e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this three-year study (2016–2018), different fertilizer treatments were compared in an intensive sweet cherry orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–204 · show in text ↑
e5

“In 2017 and 2018, fertilizer treatments resulted in an increase of the content of phosphorus (16–70%), potassium (4–22%) and magnesium (12–43%) in the fruits compared to control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer treatments increased potassium content of sweet cherry fruit by 4–22% in 2017 and 2018.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Organ / stage
fruitse5
Treatment
fertilizer treatmentse5
Outcome
potassiume5
Direction
increasee5
Value
4–22%e5
Comparator
control plotse5
Setting
In 2017 and 2018e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this three-year study (2016–2018), different fertilizer treatments were compared in an intensive sweet cherry orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–204 · show in text ↑
e5

“In 2017 and 2018, fertilizer treatments resulted in an increase of the content of phosphorus (16–70%), potassium (4–22%) and magnesium (12–43%) in the fruits compared to control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer treatments increased magnesium content of sweet cherry fruit by 12–43% in 2017 and 2018.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Organ / stage
fruitse5
Treatment
fertilizer treatmentse5
Outcome
magnesiume5
Direction
increasee5
Value
12–43%e5
Comparator
control plotse5
Setting
In 2017 and 2018e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this three-year study (2016–2018), different fertilizer treatments were compared in an intensive sweet cherry orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–204 · show in text ↑
e5

“In 2017 and 2018, fertilizer treatments resulted in an increase of the content of phosphorus (16–70%), potassium (4–22%) and magnesium (12–43%) in the fruits compared to control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1062 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · yield · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.