Abstract
Various fertilization treatments were carried out in sweat cherry orchard.The results showed that By applying of biological organic fertilizer(BOF),Soil physiochemical properties could be improved;Fertility of soil could be raised;The growth and development of sweet cherry could be increased. After applying of BOF,Soil weight/Volume was decreased 5.5%;Capillary space of soil was increased 2.5% Active P,K and organism content was 1.3 times,3.0 times,1.425%,than the control;Leaf weight and area was 26.7%,18.5% higher than the control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Biological organic fertilizer improved soil physicochemical properties and fertility in the cherry orchard.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry
Prunus aviume0 - Treatment
- biological organic fertilizer(BOF)e0
- Outcome
- Soil physiochemical propertiese0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“By applying of biological organic fertilizer(BOF),Soil physiochemical properties could be improved;Fertility of soil could be raised;The growth and development of sweet cherry could be increased.”
Claim · model-written summary
Biological organic fertilizer raised soil fertility.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
- Treatment
- biological organic fertilizer(BOF)e0
- Outcome
- Fertility of soile0
- Direction
- raisede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“By applying of biological organic fertilizer(BOF),Soil physiochemical properties could be improved;Fertility of soil could be raised;The growth and development of sweet cherry could be increased.”
Claim · model-written summary
Biological organic fertilizer increased sweet cherry growth and development.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
- Treatment
- biological organic fertilizer(BOF)e0
- Outcome
- growth and development of sweet cherrye0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“By applying of biological organic fertilizer(BOF),Soil physiochemical properties could be improved;Fertility of soil could be raised;The growth and development of sweet cherry could be increased.”
Claim · model-written summary
After fertilizer application, soil weight per volume decreased 5.5%.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- BOFe0
- Outcome
- Soil weight/Volumee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 5.5%e0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“After applying of BOF,Soil weight/Volume was decreased 5.5%;Capillary space of soil was increased 2.5% Active P,K and organism content was 1.3 times,3.0 times,1.425%,than the control;Leaf weight and area was 26.7%,18.5% higher than the control.”
t0“Effects of Biological Organic Fertilizer to Soil and the Growth and Development of Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil capillary space increased 2.5% after BOF application.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- BOFe0
- Outcome
- Capillary space of soile0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 2.5%e0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“After applying of BOF,Soil weight/Volume was decreased 5.5%;Capillary space of soil was increased 2.5% Active P,K and organism content was 1.3 times,3.0 times,1.425%,than the control;Leaf weight and area was 26.7%,18.5% higher than the control.”
t0“Effects of Biological Organic Fertilizer to Soil and the Growth and Development of Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil active P was 1.3 times control after BOF application.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Biological Organic Fertilizert0
- Outcome
- Active Pe0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 1.3 timese0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Active P,K and organism content was 1.3 times,3.0 times,1.425%,than the control”
t0“Effects of Biological Organic Fertilizer to Soil and the Growth and Development of Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil active K was 3.0 times control after BOF application.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Biological Organic Fertilizert0
- Outcome
- Ke0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 3.0 timese0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Active P,K and organism content was 1.3 times,3.0 times,1.425%,than the control”
t0“Effects of Biological Organic Fertilizer to Soil and the Growth and Development of Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil organism content was reported as 1.425% of control after BOF application.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Biological Organic Fertilizert0
- Outcome
- organism contente0
- Value
- 1.425%e0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Active P,K and organism content was 1.3 times,3.0 times,1.425%,than the control”
t0“Effects of Biological Organic Fertilizer to Soil and the Growth and Development of Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf weight was 26.7% higher than control after BOF application.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Biological Organic Fertilizert0
- Outcome
- Leaf weighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 26.7%e0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Leaf weight and area was 26.7%,18.5% higher than the control.”
t0“Effects of Biological Organic Fertilizer to Soil and the Growth and Development of Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf area was 18.5% higher than control after BOF application.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Biological Organic Fertilizert0
- Outcome
- areae0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 18.5%e0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Leaf weight and area was 26.7%,18.5% higher than the control.”
t0“Effects of Biological Organic Fertilizer to Soil and the Growth and Development of Sweet Cherry”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · growth · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.