Paper · 2018 · Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research

STUDIES ON WATER USE EFFICIENCY OF GRAFTED AND NON-GRAFTED MELON PLANTS GROWN UNDER TWO SOILLESS CULTURE SYSTEMS

MONA M. ABD EL-WANIS; MAHMOUD M. ABDEL-BAKY; SAMER R. SALMAN

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

hydroponic culture is the fastest growing sector of agriculture, and it could be impetus for food production in the future. It is expected to grow exponentially also in the future, as conditions of growing soil becoming difficult. In the current study, the effect of different rootstocks on cantaloupe plants (Cucumis melo L.) F1 hybrid Galia and the reflection of that on water consumption, growth, nutrient uptake, fruit yield and quality were studied for two successive seasons 2016 and 2017 by comparing grafted plants with non-grafted ones under two systems of hydroponic (Nutrient Film Technique and substrate culture mixture of 1 peat, 1 vermiculite and1 perlite). The Galia cantaloupe hybrid was grafted onto Lagenaria sicenaria and Cucurbita ficifolia. Non-grafted plants were used as control with both soilless culture systems. The results indicated that NFT as soilless culture system led to significant increase on plant growth characters i.e. plant height, leaves number/plant and stem thickness compared to traditional growing media. Grafting positively affected plant growth i.e. plant height, leaf number and stem thickness. Water consumption was affected also by grafting where the highest water consumption was recorded with cantaloupe plants grown in NFT system and grafted into Lagenaria sicenaria rootstock. Although growing media saved water use by plants from 85-87% in comparison with estimated water requirement calculated according pan evaporation method, the yield was low with using media cultivation system in comparison with yield of the plants grown in NFT system which saved only 39-41% of estimated water requirement increases in fruit yield and fruit size were recorded with grafted plants and this clear which may be due to utilization of the vigorous root system of the rootstocks. These grafted plants also shows increasing in minerals uptake when compared with nongrafted plantsIn general, plants grown in NFT system produced fruits characterized with superior quality, high yield, rapid harvest, and high nutrient content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The NFT soilless culture system significantly increased plant height, leaf number per plant and stem thickness of cantaloupe compared with traditional growing media.

Treatment
NFT as soilless culture systeme1
Outcome
plant growth characters i.e. plant height, leaves number/plant and stem thicknesse1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
traditional growing mediae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cantaloupe plants (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–326 · show in text ↑
e1

“NFT as soilless culture system led to significant increase on plant growth characters i.e. plant height, leaves number/plant and stem thickness compared to traditional growing media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting positively affected plant height, leaf number and stem thickness of cantaloupe compared with non-grafted plants.

Treatment
Graftinge1
Outcome
plant growth i.e. plant height, leaf number and stem thicknesse1
Direction
positively affectede1
Comparator
Non-grafted plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cantaloupe plants (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–326 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grafting positively affected plant growth i.e. plant height, leaf number and stem thickness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1139 · show in text ↑
e2

“Non-grafted plants were used as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest water consumption was recorded with cantaloupe plants grown in the NFT system and grafted onto Lagenaria sicenaria rootstock.

Treatment
grafted into Lagenaria sicenaria rootstocke1
Outcome
water consumptione1
Direction
higheste1
Setting
NFT systeme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cantaloupe plants (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–326 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest water consumption was recorded with cantaloupe plants grown in NFT system and grafted into Lagenaria sicenaria rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1327 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growing media saved 85-87% of water use compared with the estimated water requirement from the pan evaporation method.

Treatment
growing mediae1
Outcome
water usee1
Direction
savede1
Value
85-87%e1
Comparator
estimated water requirement calculated according pan evaporation methode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cantaloupe plants (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–326 · show in text ↑
e1

“growing media saved water use by plants from 85-87% in comparison with estimated water requirement calculated according pan evaporation method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1480 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The NFT system saved only 39-41% of the estimated water requirement.

Treatment
NFT systeme1
Outcome
watere1
Direction
savede1
Value
39-41%e1
Comparator
estimated water requiremente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cantaloupe plants (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–326 · show in text ↑
e1

“NFT system which saved only 39-41% of estimated water requirement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield was low with the media cultivation system in comparison with the NFT system.

Treatment
media cultivation systeme1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
lowe1
Comparator
NFT systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cantaloupe plants (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–326 · show in text ↑
e1

“the yield was low with using media cultivation system in comparison with yield of the plants grown in NFT system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1594 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield and fruit size increased with grafted plants compared with non-grafted plants.

Treatment
grafted plantse1
Outcome
fruit yield and fruit sizee1
Direction
increasese1
Comparator
Non-grafted plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cantaloupe plants (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–326 · show in text ↑
e1

“increases in fruit yield and fruit size were recorded with grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1723 · show in text ↑
e2

“Non-grafted plants were used as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–801 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest the increases in fruit yield and fruit size with grafted plants may be due to utilization of the vigorous root system of the rootstocks.

Treatment
grafted plantse1
Outcome
increases in fruit yield and fruit sizee1
Qualifier
utilization of the vigorous root system of the rootstockse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cantaloupe plants (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–326 · show in text ↑
e1

“increases in fruit yield and fruit size were recorded with grafted plants and this clear which may be due to utilization of the vigorous root system of the rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1816 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted plants showed increased mineral uptake compared with non-grafted plants.

Treatment
grafted plantse1
Outcome
minerals uptakee1
Direction
increasinge1
Comparator
nongrafted plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cantaloupe plants (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–326 · show in text ↑
e1

“These grafted plants also shows increasing in minerals uptake when compared with nongrafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1818–1916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants grown in the NFT system produced fruits with superior quality and high yield.

Treatment
NFT systeme1
Outcome
superior quality, high yielde1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cantaloupe plants (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–326 · show in text ↑
e1

“plants grown in NFT system produced fruits characterized with superior quality, high yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1928–2018 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants grown in the NFT system produced fruits with rapid harvest and high nutrient content.

Treatment
NFT systeme1
Outcome
rapid harvest, and high nutrient contente1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cantaloupe plants (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–326 · show in text ↑
e1

“plants grown in NFT system produced fruits characterized with superior quality, high yield, rapid harvest, and high nutrient content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1928–2060 · show in text ↑

grafting · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

34 papers: 30 positive, 4 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

in vitro · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

in vitro · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 18 positive, 5 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

grafting · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

grafting · nutrient: content · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

growing medium · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.