Paper · 2020 · Plant Pathology & Quarantine

Performance of fungicides on the management of Glomerella leaf spot in southern Brazil

C Ogoshi

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Glomerella leaf spot (GLS) is an apple disease difficult to control, even with the use of chemical fungicides. In years of GLS high pressure, protective fungicides in the chemical group of dithiocarbamates, especially mancozeb, have been used frequently, and even so, the control has not been satisfactory. Because of this scenario, growers have been increasing the frequency of application and the dose recommended on the product label, a situation that will become unsustainable over the years, and resistance of some species belonging to Colletotrichum acutatum species complex to mancozeb has already been observed in Brazil. Our objective was to verify the efficiency of several chemicals' fungicides in the control of GLS in field conditions in three consecutive crop seasons. The experiments were conducted at the Experimental Station of Caador in 2017/2018, 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 crop seasons. The tested fungicides were: mancozeb, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin + tebuconazole, fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobin, chlorothalonil, dithianon, captan, metiram + pyraclostrobin, thiophanate-methyl + fluazinam, fluazinam, metiram, dodine, folpet, and propineb. We assessed the GLS incidence over time, and with these data, the Area Under the Disease Incidence Progress Curve (AUDIPC) and the control efficiency of each treatment were calculated. The experimental design was in randomized blocks with four replications. The fungicides mancozeb, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin + tebuconazole, chlorothalonil, dithianon, captan, thiophanate-methyl + fluazinam, metiram, fluazinam, folpet and propineb showed an efficient control of GLS. The fungicide metiram + pyraclostrobin showed an intermediate control and the fungicides dodine, and fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobin were not efficient in GLS control. In general, systemic fungicides were not efficient in GLS control. Protectant fungicides were the most efficient in GSL control, being excellent options to be rotated with the fungicide mancozeb, which is used as a standard in GLS control in Brazil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungicide mancozeb efficiently controlled Glomerella leaf spot.

Treatment
mancozebe0
Outcome
control of GLSe0
Direction
efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungicides mancozeb, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin + tebuconazole, chlorothalonil, dithianon, captan, thiophanate-methyl + fluazinam, metiram, fluazinam, folpet and propineb showed an efficient control of GLS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1683 · show in text ↑
e1

“GLS) is an apple disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungicide mancozeb + trifloxystrobin efficiently controlled Glomerella leaf spot.

Treatment
mancozeb + trifloxystrobine0
Outcome
control of GLSe0
Direction
efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungicides mancozeb, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin + tebuconazole, chlorothalonil, dithianon, captan, thiophanate-methyl + fluazinam, metiram, fluazinam, folpet and propineb showed an efficient control of GLS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1683 · show in text ↑
e1

“GLS) is an apple disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungicide mancozeb + trifloxystrobin + tebuconazole efficiently controlled Glomerella leaf spot.

Treatment
mancozeb + trifloxystrobin + tebuconazolee0
Outcome
control of GLSe0
Direction
efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungicides mancozeb, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin + tebuconazole, chlorothalonil, dithianon, captan, thiophanate-methyl + fluazinam, metiram, fluazinam, folpet and propineb showed an efficient control of GLS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1683 · show in text ↑
e1

“GLS) is an apple disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungicide chlorothalonil efficiently controlled Glomerella leaf spot.

Treatment
chlorothalonile0
Outcome
control of GLSe0
Direction
efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungicides mancozeb, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin + tebuconazole, chlorothalonil, dithianon, captan, thiophanate-methyl + fluazinam, metiram, fluazinam, folpet and propineb showed an efficient control of GLS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1683 · show in text ↑
e1

“GLS) is an apple disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungicide dithianon efficiently controlled Glomerella leaf spot.

Treatment
dithianone0
Outcome
control of GLSe0
Direction
efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungicides mancozeb, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin + tebuconazole, chlorothalonil, dithianon, captan, thiophanate-methyl + fluazinam, metiram, fluazinam, folpet and propineb showed an efficient control of GLS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1683 · show in text ↑
e1

“GLS) is an apple disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungicide captan efficiently controlled Glomerella leaf spot.

Treatment
captane0
Outcome
control of GLSe0
Direction
efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungicides mancozeb, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin + tebuconazole, chlorothalonil, dithianon, captan, thiophanate-methyl + fluazinam, metiram, fluazinam, folpet and propineb showed an efficient control of GLS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1683 · show in text ↑
e1

“GLS) is an apple disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungicide thiophanate-methyl + fluazinam efficiently controlled Glomerella leaf spot.

Treatment
thiophanate-methyl + fluaziname0
Outcome
control of GLSe0
Direction
efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungicides mancozeb, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin + tebuconazole, chlorothalonil, dithianon, captan, thiophanate-methyl + fluazinam, metiram, fluazinam, folpet and propineb showed an efficient control of GLS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1683 · show in text ↑
e1

“GLS) is an apple disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungicide metiram efficiently controlled Glomerella leaf spot.

Treatment
metirame0
Outcome
control of GLSe0
Direction
efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungicides mancozeb, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin + tebuconazole, chlorothalonil, dithianon, captan, thiophanate-methyl + fluazinam, metiram, fluazinam, folpet and propineb showed an efficient control of GLS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1683 · show in text ↑
e1

“GLS) is an apple disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungicide fluazinam efficiently controlled Glomerella leaf spot.

Treatment
fluaziname0
Outcome
control of GLSe0
Direction
efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungicides mancozeb, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin + tebuconazole, chlorothalonil, dithianon, captan, thiophanate-methyl + fluazinam, metiram, fluazinam, folpet and propineb showed an efficient control of GLS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1683 · show in text ↑
e1

“GLS) is an apple disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungicide folpet efficiently controlled Glomerella leaf spot.

Treatment
folpete0
Outcome
control of GLSe0
Direction
efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungicides mancozeb, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin + tebuconazole, chlorothalonil, dithianon, captan, thiophanate-methyl + fluazinam, metiram, fluazinam, folpet and propineb showed an efficient control of GLS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1683 · show in text ↑
e1

“GLS) is an apple disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungicide propineb efficiently controlled Glomerella leaf spot.

Treatment
propinebe0
Outcome
control of GLSe0
Direction
efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungicides mancozeb, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin, mancozeb + trifloxystrobin + tebuconazole, chlorothalonil, dithianon, captan, thiophanate-methyl + fluazinam, metiram, fluazinam, folpet and propineb showed an efficient control of GLS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1683 · show in text ↑
e1

“GLS) is an apple disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metiram plus pyraclostrobin gave intermediate GLS control.

Treatment
metiram + pyraclostrobine0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
intermediatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungicide metiram + pyraclostrobin showed an intermediate control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1753 · show in text ↑
e1

“GLS) is an apple disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dodine was not efficient in GLS control.

Treatment
dodinee0
Outcome
GLS controle0
Direction
not efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fungicides dodine, and fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobin were not efficient in GLS control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1758–1849 · show in text ↑
e1

“GLS) is an apple disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluxapyroxad plus pyraclostrobin was not efficient in GLS control.

Treatment
fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobine0
Outcome
GLS controle0
Direction
not efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fungicides dodine, and fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobin were not efficient in GLS control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1758–1849 · show in text ↑
e1

“GLS) is an apple disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Systemic fungicides generally were not efficient in GLS control.

Treatment
systemic fungicidese0
Outcome
GLS controle0
Direction
not efficiente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In general, systemic fungicides were not efficient in GLS control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1850–1916 · show in text ↑
e1

“GLS) is an apple disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protectant fungicides were most efficient for GLS control.

Treatment
Protectant fungicidese0
Outcome
GSL controle0
Direction
most efficiente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protectant fungicides were the most efficient in GSL control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1917–1977 · show in text ↑
e1

“GLS) is an apple disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend rotating protectant fungicides with mancozeb for GLS control.

Outcome
rotated with the fungicide mancozebe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“being excellent options to be rotated with the fungicide mancozeb, which is used as a standard in GLS control in Brazil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1979–2099 · show in text ↑
e1

“GLS) is an apple disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46 · show in text ↑

pyraclostrobin · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

dithianon · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

fluxapyroxad · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

1-dodecylguanidine acetate · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

thiophanate-methyl · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mancozeb · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

metiram · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

folpet · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.