Paper · 2024 · HortTechnology

Identifying Species of Pathogens Causing Bitter Rot of Apples in Illinois and Efficacy of Fungicides for Managing the Disease

Festus Acheampong; Andrew N. Miller; Mohammad Babadoost

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Outbreaks of bitter rot disease occurred in Illinois apple ( Malus × domestica ) orchards during 2010–20. This study was conducted to assess the incidence of bitter rot in commercial apple orchards in Illinois, identify pathogen species that cause bitter rot, and evaluate the efficacy of fungicides for managing the disease. Orchard surveys conducted during 2019–21 showed that fruits with bitter rot were present in most of the orchards in southern and central Illinois, whereas only a few orchards in the northern part of the state had symptomatic fruits. A total of 270 isolates of the pathogens were collected from symptomatic fruits of 14 cultivars, and pathogen species were identified based on the morphological and molecular characteristics of the isolates. GAPDH gene sequence analyses identified species of the pathogens as Colletotrichum fioriniae , C. siamense , and C. chrysophilum . Laboratory and orchards studies were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of fungicides for managing bitter rot disease. Laboratory studies showed averages of 10.3, 9.6, and 0.24 mg⋅L −1 for the 50% effective concentrations (EC 50 ) of benzovindiflupyr, captan, and fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobin fungicides, respectively. Orchard experiments involving ‘Honeycrisp apples’ were conducted in 2019, 2020, and 2021. Benzovindiflupyr, captan, and fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobin prevented bitter rot development in the treated plots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bitter rot fruits occurred in most southern and central Illinois orchards but few northern orchards.

Outcome
fruits with bitter rote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruits with bitter rot were present in most of the orchards in southern and central Illinois, whereas only a few orchards in the northern part of the state had symptomatic fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–558 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Colletotrichum fioriniae was identified among bitter rot pathogens.

Interactor
Colletotrichum fioriniaeColletotrichum fioriniaee0pathogen
Outcome
identified species of the pathogense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum fioriniae
Colletotrichum fioriniae · Interactor(c) Mark Apgar, some rights reserved (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GAPDH gene sequence analyses identified species of the pathogens as Colletotrichum fioriniae , C. siamense , and C. chrysophilum .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. siamense was identified among bitter rot pathogens.

Interactor
C. siamenseColletotrichum siamensee0pathogen
Outcome
identified species of the pathogense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GAPDH gene sequence analyses identified species of the pathogens as Colletotrichum fioriniae , C. siamense , and C. chrysophilum .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. chrysophilum was identified among bitter rot pathogens.

Interactor
C. chrysophilumColletotrichum chrysophilume0pathogen
Outcome
identified species of the pathogense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GAPDH gene sequence analyses identified species of the pathogens as Colletotrichum fioriniae , C. siamense , and C. chrysophilum .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benzovindiflupyr had a laboratory EC50 of 10.3 mg⋅L −1.

Treatment
benzovindiflupyre0
Outcome
50% effective concentrations (EC 50 )e0
Value
10.3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Laboratory studies showed averages of 10.3, 9.6, and 0.24 mg⋅L −1 for the 50% effective concentrations (EC 50 ) of benzovindiflupyr, captan, and fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobin fungicides, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1222 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Captan had a laboratory EC50 of 9.6 mg⋅L −1.

Treatment
captane0
Outcome
50% effective concentrations (EC 50 )e0
Value
9.6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Laboratory studies showed averages of 10.3, 9.6, and 0.24 mg⋅L −1 for the 50% effective concentrations (EC 50 ) of benzovindiflupyr, captan, and fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobin fungicides, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1222 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluxapyroxad plus pyraclostrobin had a laboratory EC50 of 0.24 mg⋅L −1.

Treatment
fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobine0
Outcome
50% effective concentrations (EC 50 )e0
Value
0.24 mg⋅L −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Laboratory studies showed averages of 10.3, 9.6, and 0.24 mg⋅L −1 for the 50% effective concentrations (EC 50 ) of benzovindiflupyr, captan, and fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobin fungicides, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1222 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benzovindiflupyr prevented bitter rot in treated orchard plots.

Treatment
Benzovindiflupyre0
Outcome
bitter rot developmente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benzovindiflupyr, captan, and fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobin prevented bitter rot development in the treated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1427 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Captan prevented bitter rot in treated orchard plots.

Treatment
captane0
Outcome
bitter rot developmente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benzovindiflupyr, captan, and fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobin prevented bitter rot development in the treated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1427 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluxapyroxad plus pyraclostrobin prevented bitter rot in treated orchard plots.

Treatment
fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobine0
Outcome
bitter rot developmente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benzovindiflupyr, captan, and fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobin prevented bitter rot development in the treated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1427 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑

pyraclostrobin · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

fluxapyroxad · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

captan · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.