Paper · 2007 · The Plant Pathology Journal

After-infection Activity of Protective Fungicides against Apple White Rot

Dong-Hyuk Lee; Dae-Hee Kim; Hyun Woo; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

In a trial to select suitable fungicides for developing a spray program that can control apple white rot effectively, after-infection activities in some protective fungicides were detected. Six fungicides, mancozeb, propineb, benomyl, folpet, azoxystrobin and iminoctadine-triacetate, which had been extensively used in apple orchards, were sprayed on 12-year-old apple trees (cv. Fuji) at 15-day intervals from late May to late July. Disease incidences and infection frequencies of the fruit bagged just before and soon after each spray were examined. When the infection frequency or disease incidence of the fruit bagged after each spraying of fungicide was significantly lower than those of the fruit bagged before spraying, the fungicides appeared to confer after-infection activity. The six fungicides showed diverse activities on white rot: folpet showed after-infection activity on disease development, iminoctadine-triacetate showed after-infection activity on infection, azoxystrobin showed after-infection activity on disease development and infection, and mancozeb, propineb and benomyl showed no distinct activity. The activity of a fungicide became much higher when it was sprayed alternately with other fungicide rather than successive spraying of the same fungicide. Analysis of the properties of these protective fungicides could lead to the development of a highly effective spray program against white rot.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Folpet showed after-infection activity against disease development.

Treatment
folpete0
Outcome
disease developmente0
Direction
after-infection activitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“folpet showed after-infection activity on disease development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iminoctadine-triacetate showed after-infection activity against infection.

Treatment
iminoctadine-triacetatee0
Outcome
infectione0
Direction
after-infection activitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“iminoctadine-triacetate showed after-infection activity on infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin showed after-infection activity against disease development and infection.

Treatment
azoxystrobine0
Outcome
disease development and infectione0
Direction
after-infection activitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“azoxystrobin showed after-infection activity on disease development and infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mancozeb showed no distinct after-infection activity.

Treatment
mancozebe0
Outcome
activitye0
Direction
no distincte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mancozeb, propineb and benomyl showed no distinct activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propineb showed no distinct after-infection activity.

Treatment
propinebe0
Outcome
activitye0
Direction
no distincte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mancozeb, propineb and benomyl showed no distinct activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl showed no distinct after-infection activity.

Treatment
benomyle0
Outcome
activitye0
Direction
no distincte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mancozeb, propineb and benomyl showed no distinct activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternating fungicides yielded higher activity than successive use of the same fungicide.

Treatment
sprayed alternately with other fungicidee0
Outcome
activity of a fungicidee0
Direction
much highere0
Comparator
successive spraying of the same fungicidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activity of a fungicide became much higher when it was sprayed alternately with other fungicide rather than successive spraying of the same fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑

azoxystrobin · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

folpet · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fungicide · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 47 positive, 14 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.