Paper · 2021 · Agronomy Journal

Conservation tillage is compatible with manure injection in corn silage systems

Martin L. Battaglia; Quirine M. Ketterings; Gregory Godwin; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Adoption of conservation tillage practices has increased over the past 30 yr in the United States. Research is needed to evaluate if reduced tillage practices are compatible with manure injection on dairy farms. Two corn ( Zea mays L.) silage studies were conducted in New York to evaluate the impact of zone tillage depth and tillage intensity on early plant growth and soil nitrate‐N, corn silage productivity and quality, and nutrient uptake at harvest. Treatments included three zone tillage depths (0, 18, and 36 cm; with aerator seedbed preparation) for Study 1 (2012–2013) and three tillage intensities (no tillage, reduced tillage [aerator seedbed preparation without zone tillage], and intensified reduced tillage [aerator seedbed preparation plus zone tillage at 18‐cm depth]) for Study 2 (2014–2016). Manure was injected in the spring, and all fields had a manure and zone tillage history. Zone tillage depth did not affect early plant growth, soil nitrate‐N content at V5‐V6, corn silage yield, quality, corn stalk nitrate test (CSNT)‐N, or nutrient removal with harvest. The CSNT‐N levels exceeded 2,000 mg NO 3 –N kg –1 , confirming sufficient N for each treatment. Study 2 showed no impact of tillage intensity on corn growth, yield, or nutritive value, and CSNT‐N levels always exceeded 2,000 mg NO 3 –N kg –1 . These findings show that, on fields with a history of manure addition and reduced tillage, manure injection followed by planting without further seedbed preparation or zone tillage can maintain yields and quality and can conserve N while reducing soil disturbance and tillage‐associated fuel, equipment, and labor costs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zone tillage depth did not affect early corn growth, silage yield, or quality.

Treatment
Zone tillage depthe1
Outcome
early plant growth, soil nitrate‐N content at V5‐V6, corn silage yield, quality, corn stalk nitrate test (CSNT)‐N, or nutrient removal with harveste1
Direction
did not affecte1
Setting
New Yorke0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two corn ( Zea mays L.) silage studies were conducted in New York”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–286 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zone tillage depth did not affect early plant growth, soil nitrate‐N content at V5‐V6, corn silage yield, quality, corn stalk nitrate test (CSNT)‐N, or nutrient removal with harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1092 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn stalk nitrate exceeded 2,000 mg NO 3 –N kg –1 in each zone tillage treatment, indicating sufficient nitrogen.

Outcome
CSNT‐N levelse1
Direction
exceedede1
Value
2,000 mg NO 3 –N kg –1e1
Qualifier
sufficient N for each treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two corn ( Zea mays L.) silage studies were conducted in New York”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–286 · show in text ↑
e1

“The CSNT‐N levels exceeded 2,000 mg NO 3 –N kg –1 , confirming sufficient N for each treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage intensity had no impact on corn growth, yield, or nutritive value.

Treatment
tillage intensitye1
Outcome
corn growth, yield, or nutritive valuee1
Direction
no impacte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two corn ( Zea mays L.) silage studies were conducted in New York”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–286 · show in text ↑
e1

“Study 2 showed no impact of tillage intensity on corn growth, yield, or nutritive value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1276 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn stalk nitrate exceeded 2,000 mg NO 3 –N kg –1 throughout the tillage intensity study.

Outcome
CSNT‐N levelse1
Direction
exceedede1
Value
2,000 mg NO 3 –N kg –1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two corn ( Zea mays L.) silage studies were conducted in New York”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–286 · show in text ↑
e1

“CSNT‐N levels always exceeded 2,000 mg NO 3 –N kg –1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1334 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

On previously manured reduced tillage fields, the authors recommend manure injection followed by direct planting to maintain yield and quality while conserving nitrogen and reducing operations.

Outcome
manure injection followed by planting without further seedbed preparation or zone tillagee1
Qualifier
on fields with a history of manure addition and reduced tillagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.) silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–251 · show in text ↑
e1

“on fields with a history of manure addition and reduced tillage, manure injection followed by planting without further seedbed preparation or zone tillage can maintain yields and quality and can conserve N while reducing soil disturbance and tillage‐associated fuel, equipment, and labor costs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1656 · show in text ↑

tillage · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 93 positive, 34 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.