Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Impact of micronutrient supplementation through drip fertigation on growth, yield and recovery in sugarcane

Bharathalakshmi M; Gouri V; Sitaramalakshmi CH; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Sugarcane is an important commercial crop grown in Andhra Pradesh in an area of 1.0 lakh ha. It is a high biomass producing crop and depletes large quantities of nutrients from soil. A sugarcane crop producing 100tons of cane ha-1 remove 208Kg N, 53Kg P, 280Kg K, 30Kg Fe, 1.2 Kg Mn, 0.6 Kg Zn and 0.2 Kg Cu respectively from soil. Considering the need of micro nutrients for productively enhancement in sugarcane, a field study was carried out at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle, North Coastal Andhra Pradesh for 3 consecutive years from 2016-17 to 2018-19 to know the impact of different micro nutrients supply through soil and fertigation along with supply of major nutrients of NPK. The experimental results indicated that application of Zn@ 25Kg/ha through drip fertigation or application of combination of micro nutrients as Formula-4 @2Kg ha-1 in 10 splits at weekly interval commencing from 45 days after planting to 180 days after planting favoured good growth and culminated in higher cane yield, sugar yields and uptake of macro and micro nutrients.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc drip fertigation favored sugarcane growth.

Taxon
Sugarcanee1
Treatment
Zn@ 25Kg/ha through drip fertigatione0
Outcome
good growthe0
Direction
favourede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of Zn@ 25Kg/ha through drip fertigation or application of combination of micro nutrients as Formula-4 @2Kg ha-1 in 10 splits at weekly interval commencing from 45 days after planting to 180 days after planting favoured good growth and culminated in higher cane yield, sugar yields and uptake of macro and micro nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–1078 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sugarcane is an important commercial crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc drip fertigation increased cane and sugar yields.

Taxon
Sugarcanee1
Treatment
Zn@ 25Kg/ha through drip fertigatione0
Outcome
cane yield, sugar yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of Zn@ 25Kg/ha through drip fertigation or application of combination of micro nutrients as Formula-4 @2Kg ha-1 in 10 splits at weekly interval commencing from 45 days after planting to 180 days after planting favoured good growth and culminated in higher cane yield, sugar yields and uptake of macro and micro nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–1078 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sugarcane is an important commercial crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc drip fertigation increased macro and micronutrient uptake.

Taxon
Sugarcanee1
Treatment
Zn@ 25Kg/ha through drip fertigatione0
Outcome
uptake of macro and micro nutrientse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of Zn@ 25Kg/ha through drip fertigation or application of combination of micro nutrients as Formula-4 @2Kg ha-1 in 10 splits at weekly interval commencing from 45 days after planting to 180 days after planting favoured good growth and culminated in higher cane yield, sugar yields and uptake of macro and micro nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–1078 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sugarcane is an important commercial crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Formula-4 micronutrients favored sugarcane growth.

Taxon
Sugarcanee1
Treatment
Formula-4 @2Kg ha-1 in 10 splits at weekly intervale0
Outcome
good growthe0
Direction
favourede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of combination of micro nutrients as Formula-4 @2Kg ha-1 in 10 splits at weekly interval commencing from 45 days after planting to 180 days after planting favoured good growth and culminated in higher cane yield, sugar yields and uptake of macro and micro nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–1078 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sugarcane is an important commercial crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Formula-4 micronutrients increased cane and sugar yields.

Taxon
Sugarcanee1
Treatment
Formula-4 @2Kg ha-1 in 10 splits at weekly intervale0
Outcome
cane yield, sugar yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of combination of micro nutrients as Formula-4 @2Kg ha-1 in 10 splits at weekly interval commencing from 45 days after planting to 180 days after planting favoured good growth and culminated in higher cane yield, sugar yields and uptake of macro and micro nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–1078 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sugarcane is an important commercial crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Formula-4 micronutrients increased macro and micronutrient uptake.

Taxon
Sugarcanee1
Treatment
Formula-4 @2Kg ha-1 in 10 splits at weekly intervale0
Outcome
uptake of macro and micro nutrientse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of combination of micro nutrients as Formula-4 @2Kg ha-1 in 10 splits at weekly interval commencing from 45 days after planting to 180 days after planting favoured good growth and culminated in higher cane yield, sugar yields and uptake of macro and micro nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–1078 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sugarcane is an important commercial crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–41 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

irrigation · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 47 positive, 7 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 71 positive, 7 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

irrigation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 129 positive, 13 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.