Paper · 2020 · Nexo Revista Científica

Evaluation of meliloti rhizobium activity effectiveness on quantitative properties of alfalfa by bacterial inoculation in the south-east of Iran

Hojjat Safari Kamal Abadi; Ali Reza Valad Abadi; Jahanfar Daneshian; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

In order to investigate the effect of bacterial inoculation on yield, chlorophyll and protein content of alfalfa to obtain economically experimental products in Shahid Zande Rouh Agricultural Training Center in Kerman as a split plot in time based on a completely randomized block design with four replications on the ground Which had not been done before, was done. Bacterial inoculation was at three levels (Rhizobium meliluti, Rhizobium leguminasarum and no inoculation as a control). Bacterial inoculation had a significant effect on all studied traits and caused an increase in chlorophyll content, yield and protein percentage. In terms of fresh forage weight, the first and third crops had the highest yield with the application of Rhizobium meliloti (6 tons per hectare). The highest percentage of protein related to inoculation of Rhizobium meliloti was observed in the second Picking. According to the results of this study, inoculation with Rhizobium meliloti bacteria increases the ability of nitrogen fixation 3 to 4 times compared to the control and improved the alfalfa traits of Bami cultivar in southeastern Iran.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation increased alfalfa chlorophyll content.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
Bacterial inoculatione0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacterial inoculation had a significant effect on all studied traits and caused an increase in chlorophyll content, yield and protein percentage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–633 · show in text ↑
e1

“protein content of alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation increased alfalfa yield.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
Bacterial inoculatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacterial inoculation had a significant effect on all studied traits and caused an increase in chlorophyll content, yield and protein percentage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–633 · show in text ↑
e1

“protein content of alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation increased alfalfa protein percentage.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
Bacterial inoculatione0
Outcome
protein percentagee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacterial inoculation had a significant effect on all studied traits and caused an increase in chlorophyll content, yield and protein percentage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–633 · show in text ↑
e1

“protein content of alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium meliloti gave the highest fresh forage yield in the first and third crops, at 6 tons per hectare.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
application of Rhizobium melilotie0
Interactor
Rhizobium melilotiSinorhizobium melilotie0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6 tons per hectaree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sinorhizobium meliloti
Sinorhizobium meliloti · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the first and third crops had the highest yield with the application of Rhizobium meliloti (6 tons per hectare).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–779 · show in text ↑
e1

“protein content of alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium meliloti inoculation produced the highest protein percentage in the second picking.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
inoculation of Rhizobium melilotie0
Interactor
Rhizobium melilotiSinorhizobium melilotie0symbiont
Outcome
percentage of proteine0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
second Pickinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sinorhizobium meliloti
Sinorhizobium meliloti · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest percentage of protein related to inoculation of Rhizobium meliloti was observed in the second Picking.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–894 · show in text ↑
e1

“protein content of alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium meliloti inoculation increased nitrogen fixation 3 to 4 times versus control.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
inoculation with Rhizobium meliloti bacteriae0
Interactor
Rhizobium melilotiSinorhizobium melilotie0symbiont
Outcome
ability of nitrogen fixatione0
Direction
increasese0
Value
3 to 4 timese0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sinorhizobium meliloti
Sinorhizobium meliloti · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with Rhizobium meliloti bacteria increases the ability of nitrogen fixation 3 to 4 times compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1059 · show in text ↑
e1

“protein content of alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–112 · show in text ↑

Sinorhizobium meliloti · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Sinorhizobium meliloti · symbiosis · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Sinorhizobium meliloti · quality: protein · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

69 papers: 62 positive, 7 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · quality: protein · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 22 positive, 3 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 49 positive, 8 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.