Paper · 2021 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Foliar nutritional content and apple fruit quality as affected by organic, conventional, or integrated management

Adriana Hernández-Rodríguez; Mario Montaño-Carrasco; Dámaris Ojeda-Barrios; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This research aimed to compare two levels (medium and high) and three types of fertilization (organic, chemical, and integrated) in both foliar nutritional content and fruit quality of Golden Delicious apple variety. The foliar concentration of macro and micronutrients was affected neither by fertilization level nor fertilization type, with the exception of potassium which reached their highest concentration in the high level of chemical fertilization (T1-HC). Regarding the fruit quality attributes, results showed no statistical differences in weight, size, firmness, pH, and starch content between the level and type of fertilization. With the high level of organic fertilization, the best apple color was found, while the medium level of organic fertilization showed the highest concentration of both soluble solid content and total phenolic compounds. Thus, fertilization level had greater influence than the fertilization type. Results also showed that under organic fertilization management is possible obtaining a foliar nutritional content and fruits quality attributes similar to those treated with chemical fertilizers. Future studies must be carried out for elucidating the impact of long-term organic fertilization on the fruit quality and foliar nutritional content of other crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar macro and micronutrient concentrations were affected neither by fertilization level nor by fertilization type, except potassium.

Material
Golden Deliciouse0
Treatment
fertilization levele1
Outcome
foliar concentration of macro and micronutrientse1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Qualifier
nor fertilization typee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Golden Delicious apple variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–215 · show in text ↑
e1

“The foliar concentration of macro and micronutrients was affected neither by fertilization level nor fertilization type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar potassium reached its highest concentration under the high level of chemical fertilization (T1-HC).

Material
Golden Deliciouse0
Treatment
high level of chemical fertilization (T1-HC)e1
Outcome
potassiume1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Golden Delicious apple variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–215 · show in text ↑
e1

“with the exception of potassium which reached their highest concentration in the high level of chemical fertilization (T1-HC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit weight, size and firmness showed no statistical differences between fertilization levels and types.

Material
Golden Deliciouse0
Treatment
level and type of fertilizatione1
Outcome
weight, size, firmnesse1
Direction
no statistical differencese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Golden Delicious apple variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–215 · show in text ↑
e1

“results showed no statistical differences in weight, size, firmness, pH, and starch content between the level and type of fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit pH and starch content showed no statistical differences between fertilization levels and types.

Material
Golden Deliciouse0
Treatment
level and type of fertilizatione1
Outcome
pH, and starch contente1
Direction
no statistical differencese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Golden Delicious apple variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–215 · show in text ↑
e1

“results showed no statistical differences in weight, size, firmness, pH, and starch content between the level and type of fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The high level of organic fertilization gave the best apple color.

Material
Golden Deliciouse0
Treatment
high level of organic fertilizatione1
Outcome
apple colore1
Direction
beste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Golden Delicious apple variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–215 · show in text ↑
e1

“With the high level of organic fertilization, the best apple color was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The medium level of organic fertilization gave the highest soluble solid content and total phenolic compounds.

Material
Golden Deliciouse0
Treatment
medium level of organic fertilizatione1
Outcome
soluble solid content and total phenolic compoundse1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Golden Delicious apple variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–215 · show in text ↑
e1

“the medium level of organic fertilization showed the highest concentration of both soluble solid content and total phenolic compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization level had greater influence than fertilization type.

Material
Golden Deliciouse0
Treatment
fertilization levele1
Outcome
influencee1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
fertilization typee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Golden Delicious apple variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–215 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertilization level had greater influence than the fertilization type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–936 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under organic fertilization, foliar nutritional content and fruit quality attributes similar to those under chemical fertilizers can be obtained.

Material
Golden Deliciouse0
Treatment
organic fertilizatione1
Outcome
foliar nutritional content and fruits quality attributese1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
chemical fertilizerse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Golden Delicious apple variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–215 · show in text ↑
e1

“under organic fertilization management is possible obtaining a foliar nutritional content and fruits quality attributes similar to those treated with chemical fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1133 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 18 positive, 8 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 22 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 23 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 31 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

117 papers: 86 positive, 31 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

in vitro · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.