Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Spraying calcium fertilizer decreased acid content of apples.

A claim from Effects of Spraying Calcium Fertilizer on Photosynthesis, Mineral Content, Sugar–Acid Metabolism and Fruit Quality of Fuji Apples · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying calcium fertilizer decreased acid content of apples.

Treatment
Spraying calcium fertilizere2
Outcome
acid contente2
Direction
decreasede2
Setting
Taidong Base of the Shandong Institute of Pomologye6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Spraying calcium fertilizer increased the sugar content and decreased the acid content of the apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1537
e6

“conducted at the Taidong Base of the Shandong Institute of Pomology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–82

Title

Effects of Spraying Calcium Fertilizer on Photosynthesis, Mineral Content, Sugar–Acid Metabolism and Fruit Quality of Fuji Apples

Guiping Wang; Jinzheng Wang; Xueping Han; et al. Agronomy 2022. doi:10.3390/agronomy12102563

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-7bdbe8cf49f8be17e8757abd124ea838f8eddfaf9f5294a687c3454efdcbfe3f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 15 in the model’s answer

calcium atom · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 31 positive, 18 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 47 positive, 14 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.