Paper · 2021 · Soil and Sediment Contamination An International Journal

The Effects of Fulvic Acid on Physiological and Anatomical Characteristics of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cv. Flamura 85 Exposed to Chromium Stress

Adnan Akcin

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this study, the effects of fulvic acid (FA) were investigated on the concentrations of photosynthetic pigments, malondialdehyde (MDA) and root and stem anatomy in Triticum aestivum L. under chromium stress. Plants were grown under-controlled growth chamber conditions and then exposed to 0.10, 0.20, 0.30 or 0.50 mM chromium solution (Cr6+) and 1.5 mg/L of FA solution alone or in combination with the Cr stress for 21 days. Results indicate that the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll and carotenoid contents were lower in the chromium-treated group than in the FA + Cr treated group, depending on the amount of chromium stress applied. The decrease levels in the ratio of the photosynthetic pigments in Cr treated groups were as follows (%): Chlorophyll a 55, chlorophyll b 72.83, total chlorophyll 44.65, total carotenoid 45.09. These levels in FA + Cr treated groups were as follows, respectively: 28.82, 53.70, 31.21 and 31.35. On the other hand, the chlorophyll a/b ratio and MDA contents were higher in the chromium-treated group in comparison to the FA + Cr treated group. The increase levels in Cr treated groups in the ratio of the chlorophyll a/b and MDA contents were as follows (%): Chlorophyll a/b 40.17, MDA 45.95. The ameliorating effect of FA was determined as 5.40% in MDA and 4.78% in chlorophyll a/b ratio. The cross-sections of plant roots exposed to Cr stress presented some anatomical changes. The stem of Cr-treated plants showed an increase in the thickness of sclerenchyma, phloem and xylem and the diameter of parenchyma cells. Significant reduction in the diameter of vessel elements in the stem were observed as a result of Cr exposure. In conclusion, FA could play an important role in reducing chromium stress in wheat plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

chlorophyll a was lower under chromium alone than FA plus chromium.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
chromium-treated groupe0
Outcome
chlorophyll ae0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
depending on the amount of chromium stress appliede0
Comparator
FA + Cr treated groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results indicate that the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll and carotenoid contents were lower in the chromium-treated group than in the FA + Cr treated group, depending on the amount of chromium stress applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

chlorophyll b was lower under chromium alone than FA plus chromium.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
chromium-treated groupe0
Outcome
chlorophyll be0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
depending on the amount of chromium stress appliede0
Comparator
FA + Cr treated groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results indicate that the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll and carotenoid contents were lower in the chromium-treated group than in the FA + Cr treated group, depending on the amount of chromium stress applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

total chlorophyll was lower under chromium alone than FA plus chromium.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
chromium-treated groupe0
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
depending on the amount of chromium stress appliede0
Comparator
FA + Cr treated groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results indicate that the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll and carotenoid contents were lower in the chromium-treated group than in the FA + Cr treated group, depending on the amount of chromium stress applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

carotenoid contents was lower under chromium alone than FA plus chromium.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
chromium-treated groupe0
Outcome
carotenoid contentse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
depending on the amount of chromium stress appliede0
Comparator
FA + Cr treated groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results indicate that the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll and carotenoid contents were lower in the chromium-treated group than in the FA + Cr treated group, depending on the amount of chromium stress applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a decreased by 55% under chromium treatment.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Cr treated groupse0
Outcome
Chlorophyll ae0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
55e0
Qualifier
(%)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“The decrease levels in the ratio of the photosynthetic pigments in Cr treated groups were as follows (%): Chlorophyll a 55, chlorophyll b 72.83, total chlorophyll 44.65, total carotenoid 45.09.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

chlorophyll b decreased by 72.83% under chromium treatment.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Cr treated groupse0
Outcome
chlorophyll be0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
72.83e0
Qualifier
(%)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“The decrease levels in the ratio of the photosynthetic pigments in Cr treated groups were as follows (%): Chlorophyll a 55, chlorophyll b 72.83, total chlorophyll 44.65, total carotenoid 45.09.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

total chlorophyll decreased by 44.65% under chromium treatment.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Cr treated groupse0
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
44.65e0
Qualifier
(%)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“The decrease levels in the ratio of the photosynthetic pigments in Cr treated groups were as follows (%): Chlorophyll a 55, chlorophyll b 72.83, total chlorophyll 44.65, total carotenoid 45.09.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

total carotenoid decreased by 45.09% under chromium treatment.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Cr treated groupse0
Outcome
total carotenoide0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
45.09e0
Qualifier
(%)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“The decrease levels in the ratio of the photosynthetic pigments in Cr treated groups were as follows (%): Chlorophyll a 55, chlorophyll b 72.83, total chlorophyll 44.65, total carotenoid 45.09.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

chlorophyll a decreased by 28.82% in FA plus chromium groups.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
FA + Cr treated groupse0
Value
28.82e0
Qualifier
respectivelye0

Not reportedComparatorOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“These levels in FA + Cr treated groups were as follows, respectively: 28.82, 53.70, 31.21 and 31.35.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

chlorophyll b decreased by 53.70% in FA plus chromium groups.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
FA + Cr treated groupse0
Value
53.70e0
Qualifier
respectivelye0

Not reportedComparatorOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“These levels in FA + Cr treated groups were as follows, respectively: 28.82, 53.70, 31.21 and 31.35.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

total chlorophyll decreased by 31.21% in FA plus chromium groups.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
FA + Cr treated groupse0
Value
31.21e0
Qualifier
respectivelye0

Not reportedComparatorOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“These levels in FA + Cr treated groups were as follows, respectively: 28.82, 53.70, 31.21 and 31.35.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

total carotenoid decreased by 31.35% in FA plus chromium groups.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
FA + Cr treated groupse0
Value
31.35e0
Qualifier
respectivelye0

Not reportedComparatorOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“These levels in FA + Cr treated groups were as follows, respectively: 28.82, 53.70, 31.21 and 31.35.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

chlorophyll a/b ratio was higher under chromium alone than FA plus chromium.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
chromium-treated groupe0
Outcome
chlorophyll a/b ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
FA + Cr treated groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“the chlorophyll a/b ratio and MDA contents were higher in the chromium-treated group in comparison to the FA + Cr treated group.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1096 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MDA contents was higher under chromium alone than FA plus chromium.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
chromium-treated groupe0
Outcome
MDA contentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
FA + Cr treated groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“the chlorophyll a/b ratio and MDA contents were higher in the chromium-treated group in comparison to the FA + Cr treated group.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1096 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a/b increased by 40.17% in chromium groups.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Cr treated groupse0
Outcome
Chlorophyll a/be0
Direction
increasee0
Value
40.17e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increase levels in Cr treated groups in the ratio of the chlorophyll a/b and MDA contents were as follows (%): Chlorophyll a/b 40.17, MDA 45.95.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MDA increased by 45.95% in chromium groups.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Cr treated groupse0
Outcome
MDAe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
45.95e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increase levels in Cr treated groups in the ratio of the chlorophyll a/b and MDA contents were as follows (%): Chlorophyll a/b 40.17, MDA 45.95.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fulvic acid ameliorated MDA by 5.40%.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
FAe0
Outcome
MDAe0
Value
5.40%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“The ameliorating effect of FA was determined as 5.40% in MDA and 4.78% in chlorophyll a/b ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fulvic acid ameliorated chlorophyll a/b ratio by 4.78%.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
FAe0
Outcome
chlorophyll a/b ratioe0
Value
4.78%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“The ameliorating effect of FA was determined as 5.40% in MDA and 4.78% in chlorophyll a/b ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromium exposure changed root anatomy.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
plant rootse0
Treatment
Cr stresse0
Outcome
anatomical changese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“The cross-sections of plant roots exposed to Cr stress presented some anatomical changes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromium increased stem sclerenchyma, phloem and xylem thickness and parenchyma cell diameter.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
steme0
Treatment
Cr-treated plantse0
Outcome
thickness of sclerenchyma, phloem and xylem and the diameter of parenchyma cellse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“The stem of Cr-treated plants showed an increase in the thickness of sclerenchyma, phloem and xylem and the diameter of parenchyma cells.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1570 · show in text ↑

chromium atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

chromium atom · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

chromium atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 1 positive, 9 negative or no effect

9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

other · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

other · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

29 papers: 29 positive, 0 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.