Paper · 2021 · Crop and Pasture Science

Biofortification of wheat with zinc as affected by foliar applications of zinc, pesticides, phosphorus and biostimulants

Peng Ning; Xiaoyuan Zhang; Tianqi Wu; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Integrating foliar zinc (Zn) application into common practices, e.g. application of pesticides, phosphorus (P) or biostimulants, is a feasible agronomic strategy of wheat biofortification. However, it remains unclear how this integrated approach affects the efficacy of foliar Zn sprays, especially under unfavourable environmental conditions. Here, two field experiments considering Zn forms (ZnSO4 and zinc-glycine) and applications (alone or combined with pesticides, KH2PO4, and biostimulants amino acids or fulvic acids) were conducted in two seasons (2017 and 2018), and their effects on the magnitude of grain Zn increment and bioavailability were evaluated. The results showed that less precipitation in 2018 caused 11.7–52.2% yield losses than in 2017, which increased grain Zn concentration by 13.4–58.4%. Foliar application of Zn-glycine did not surpass ZnSO4 spray in regarding to grain Zn concentration and bioavailability. Grain Zn concentration substantially decreased in plants sprayed with KH2PO4 irrespective of Zn forms applied, indicating strong antagonistic effects of P supply on grain Zn enrichment. There were no differences in grain Zn density between the applications of amino acids and fulvic acids. However, grain Zn bioavailability significantly increased by 22.3 and 23.4% in the Zn plus pesticides treatment when sprayed with fulvic acids in 2017 and with amino acids in 2018, respectively. Overall, environmental conditions and foliar Zn management considering Zn forms and applications accounted for 35–45% and 20–37% of explained variation in the magnitude of grain Zn increment, respectively. The results demonstrated that management and environment are crucial factors to consider in agronomic biofortification of wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower 2018 precipitation caused yield losses relative to 2017.

Outcome
yield lossese0
Direction
lossese0
Value
11.7–52.2%e0
Comparator
2017e0
Setting
2018e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“less precipitation in 2018 caused 11.7–52.2% yield losses than in 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2018 conditions increased grain zinc concentration.

Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.4–58.4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which increased grain Zn concentration by 13.4–58.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn-glycine did not surpass ZnSO4 for grain zinc concentration and bioavailability.

Treatment
Foliar application of Zn-glycinee0
Outcome
grain Zn concentration and bioavailabilitye0
Direction
did not surpasse0
Comparator
ZnSO4 spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of Zn-glycine did not surpass ZnSO4 spray in regarding to grain Zn concentration and bioavailability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KH2PO4 spray decreased grain zinc concentration regardless of zinc form.

Treatment
sprayed with KH2PO4e0
Outcome
Grain Zn concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
irrespective of Zn forms appliede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain Zn concentration substantially decreased in plants sprayed with KH2PO4 irrespective of Zn forms applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino and fulvic acid applications had no difference in grain zinc density.

Treatment
applications of amino acidse0
Outcome
grain Zn densitye0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
fulvic acidse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no differences in grain Zn density between the applications of amino acids and fulvic acids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fulvic acids with zinc plus pesticides raised grain zinc bioavailability in 2017.

Treatment
sprayed with fulvic acidse0
Outcome
grain Zn bioavailabilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22.3e0
Qualifier
Zn plus pesticides treatmente0
Setting
2017e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain Zn bioavailability significantly increased by 22.3 and 23.4% in the Zn plus pesticides treatment when sprayed with fulvic acids in 2017 and with amino acids in 2018, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1421 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acids with zinc plus pesticides raised grain zinc bioavailability in 2018.

Treatment
with amino acidse0
Outcome
grain Zn bioavailabilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
23.4%e0
Qualifier
Zn plus pesticides treatmente0
Setting
2018e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain Zn bioavailability significantly increased by 22.3 and 23.4% in the Zn plus pesticides treatment when sprayed with fulvic acids in 2017 and with amino acids in 2018, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1421 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Environmental conditions accounted for 35–45% of explained variation in grain zinc increment.

Outcome
explained variation in the magnitude of grain Zn incremente0
Value
35–45%e0
Setting
environmental conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“environmental conditions and foliar Zn management considering Zn forms and applications accounted for 35–45% and 20–37% of explained variation in the magnitude of grain Zn increment, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1627 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc management accounted for 20–37% of explained variation in grain zinc increment.

Treatment
foliar Zn management considering Zn forms and applicationse0
Outcome
explained variation in the magnitude of grain Zn incremente0
Value
20–37%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“environmental conditions and foliar Zn management considering Zn forms and applications accounted for 35–45% and 20–37% of explained variation in the magnitude of grain Zn increment, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1627 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.