Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of moisture regimes and sowing methods on yield, economics and nutrient uptake by grain and straw of timely and late sown cultivar of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Gyanendra Kumar; Vishuddha Nanad; Ankit Kumar; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The field experiment was conduct, at Agronomy Research farm, Acharya Narendra Dev University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya, (U.P.) during Rabi season of two combined year of 2017-18 and 2018-19 with an objective of to find out the suitable wheat two cultivars with moisture regime and different sowing method system. Eighteen treatment combination consisted of two wheat variety (PBW-343 and HUW-234) and three moisture regimes (irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE, 1.0 IW/CPE ratio and irrigation at CRI late jointing and flowering stage allotted in main plots and three sowing methods system (Broad casting, seed drill and FRIB) in sub-plots. The experiment was conducted in split plot design (SPD) with 3 replication on silty loam soil having low organic carbon (0.33% and 0.32%) and available nitrogen (137.60 kg ha-1 and 136.82 kg ha-1) medium in phosphorus (15.20 kg ha-1 and 14.70 kg ha-1) and available potassium (249.30 kg ha-1 and 248.32 kg ha-1) and soil pH is high (8.30 and 8.20). The crop was show on November 25 in the first and second both years, respectively using a seed rate of 125 kg ha-1 with row sowing of 22.5 (cm) apart. The crop was harvest on April 17 and April 19 during 2018 and 2019 respectively. The biological yield with harvest index were found significantly high with variety PBW-343along with moisture regime 1.0 IW/CPE and wheat sown by FIRB (Furrow irrigation raised bed) method over rest of the treatments during both year. The highest gross income (₹ 125203.80 and 134785.75 ha-1), net return (₹ 91728.80 and 98485.75 ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (2.74 and 2.71 ₹-1 invested) was obtained with the PBW-343 and Irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE ratio along with furrow irrigated raised bed method during 2017-18 and 2018-19, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PBW-343 with 1.0 IW/CPE irrigation and FIRB sowing had significantly high biological yield.

Material
PBW-343e0
Treatment
moisture regime 1.0 IW/CPE and wheat sown by FIRB (Furrow irrigation raised bed) methode0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biological yield with harvest index were found significantly high with variety PBW-343along with moisture regime 1.0 IW/CPE and wheat sown by FIRB (Furrow irrigation raised bed) method over rest of the treatments during both year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PBW-343 with 1.0 IW/CPE irrigation and FIRB sowing had significantly high harvest index.

Material
PBW-343e0
Treatment
moisture regime 1.0 IW/CPE and wheat sown by FIRB (Furrow irrigation raised bed) methode0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biological yield with harvest index were found significantly high with variety PBW-343along with moisture regime 1.0 IW/CPE and wheat sown by FIRB (Furrow irrigation raised bed) method over rest of the treatments during both year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1468 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That treatment combination produced the highest gross income in both seasons.

Material
PBW-343e0
Outcome
gross incomee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
₹ 125203.80 and 134785.75 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest gross income (₹ 125203.80 and 134785.75 ha-1), net return (₹ 91728.80 and 98485.75 ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (2.74 and 2.71 ₹-1 invested) was obtained with the PBW-343 and Irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE ratio along with furrow irrigated raised bed method during 2017-18 and 2018-19, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1775 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–169 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That treatment combination produced the highest net return in both seasons.

Material
PBW-343e0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
₹ 91728.80 and 98485.75 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest gross income (₹ 125203.80 and 134785.75 ha-1), net return (₹ 91728.80 and 98485.75 ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (2.74 and 2.71 ₹-1 invested) was obtained with the PBW-343 and Irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE ratio along with furrow irrigated raised bed method during 2017-18 and 2018-19, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1775 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–169 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That treatment combination produced the highest benefit-to-cost ratio in both seasons.

Material
PBW-343e0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.74 and 2.71 ₹-1 investede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest gross income (₹ 125203.80 and 134785.75 ha-1), net return (₹ 91728.80 and 98485.75 ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (2.74 and 2.71 ₹-1 invested) was obtained with the PBW-343 and Irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE ratio along with furrow irrigated raised bed method during 2017-18 and 2018-19, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1775 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–169 · show in text ↑

soil water · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

76 papers: 50 positive, 26 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.