Intervention effectmodel-written summary

PBW-343 with 1.0 IW/CPE irrigation and FIRB sowing had significantly high harvest index.

A claim from Effect of moisture regimes and sowing methods on yield, economics and nutrient uptake by grain and straw of timely and late sown cultivar of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PBW-343 with 1.0 IW/CPE irrigation and FIRB sowing had significantly high harvest index.

Material
PBW-343e0
Treatment
moisture regime 1.0 IW/CPE and wheat sown by FIRB (Furrow irrigation raised bed) methode0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biological yield with harvest index were found significantly high with variety PBW-343along with moisture regime 1.0 IW/CPE and wheat sown by FIRB (Furrow irrigation raised bed) method over rest of the treatments during both year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1468

Title

Effect of moisture regimes and sowing methods on yield, economics and nutrient uptake by grain and straw of timely and late sown cultivar of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Gyanendra Kumar; Vishuddha Nanad; Ankit Kumar; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2021. doi:10.22271/chemi.2021.v9.i1am.11647

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-1806c81057b07f9f8169f2f4f3fb9f807970fc8fdc40abc1d1f70493aad3f567 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

soil water · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

76 papers: 50 positive, 26 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this claim · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Lower water availability caused a higher grain number reduction in wheat

    Effects of Drought Stress on Pollen Sterility, Grain Yield, Abscisic Acid and Protective Enzymes in Two Winter Wheat Cultivars · 2017

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    wheat yield loss loss.

    Individual and combined effect of waterlogging and salinity on crop yields in the Indus basin · 2002 · compared with 1–2 m

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Moisture stress at any growth stage lowered grain yield.

    Some Effects of Soil Moisture Stress on the Growth of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em Thell.)1 · 1970

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Late sowing with heat and moisture deficit impaired germination through reproduction and drastically reduced yield.

    High temperature combined with drought affect rainfed spring wheat and barley in south-eastern Russia: Yield, relative performance and heat susceptibility index · 2012

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    The increase in soil water was not accompanied by increased wheat yield.

    Cropping practices in the Victorian Mallee. 1. Effect of direct drilling and stubble retention on the water economy and yield of wheat · 1993

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Low to moderate soil moisture stress had no significant influence on grain yield.

    EFFECTS OF NITROGEN, TEMPERATURE, AND MOISTURE REGIME ON THE YIELD AND PROTEIN CONTENT OF NEEPAWA WHEAT · 1972

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Low preanthesis soil water reduced head number per square metre of winter wheat in both years.

    THE INFLUENCE OF WATER AVAILABILITY ON WINTER WHEAT YIELDS · 1982

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Low available soil water from booting to late grain filling produced the lowest biomass, grain yield and harvest index in T0.

    Relationship of Water Use Efficiency with Photoassimilate Accumulation and Transport in Wheat under Deficit Irrigation · 2007

    Opposite direction

67 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Irrigation at all critical stages gave the highest gross returns, net returns and benefit:cost ratio in wheat among irrigation schedules.

    Impact of irrigation schedules and nutrient management on growth, yield and root traits of wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties · 2001 · compared with irrigations schedules

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Six irrigations gave the highest grain yield of 2669 kg ha -1.

    Water use efficiency, consumptive use and soil moisture extraction pattern of wheat as influenced by irrigation schedules and genotypes · 2016 · compared with other irrigation schedules

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. negative
    Minimum irrigation lowered average winter wheat yield by 14% versus full irrigation.

    Performance of Double‐Cropped Winter Wheat–Summer Maize under Minimum Irrigation in the North China Plain · 2006 · compared with fully irrigated treatment (FI)

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Moderately saline water substituted for good quality water during part of the season maintained total wheat grain yield.

    Time of Salt Stress Affects Growth and Yield Components of Irrigated Wheat · 1994 · compared with good quality water

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Saline irrigation caused soil salinization and reduced wheat growth and yield.

    Effect of Straw Biochar on Soil Properties and Wheat Production under Saline Water Irrigation · 2019

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Deficit irrigation in salt-affected soil reduced wheat productivity.

    Collaborative Impact of Compost and Beneficial Rhizobacteria on Soil Properties, Physiological Attributes, and Productivity of Wheat Subjected to Deficit Irrigation in Salt Affected Soil · 2022

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Wastewater irrigation decreased plant height, leaf area and grain yield in wheat.

    Effect of Wastewater Irrigation on Photosynthesis, Growth, and Anatomical Features of Two Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2020

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    An additional 33 mm of irrigation did not increase grain yield.

    Source–sink balance and manipulating sink–source relations of wheat indicate that the yield potential of wheat is sink-limited in high-rainfall zones · 2010

    Opposite direction

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Bed planting increased grain yield by 14% versus happy seeder.

    Effect of different methods of sowing and row orientation on growth, yield and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2019 · compared with happy seeder

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
    No N application at tillering stage decreased spikes number per m2 and seeds per spike.

    Wheat yield and grain protein response to nitrogen amount and timing. · 2011

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Grain yield under stress during tillering and jointing was 27% lower than under the nonstressed treatment I‐1.

    Winter Wheat Response to Nitrogen and Irrigation · 1988 · compared with nonstressed (I‐1)

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    NT likely decreased wheat yield.

    The impacts of conservation agriculture on crop yield in China depend on specific practices, crops and cropping regions · 2014

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Tillage treatments had no residual effect on subsequent sunflower and wheat yields.

    Tillage and Residue Effects on Wheat, Sorghum, and Sunflower Grown in Rotation · 1984

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Tillage system had no significant wheat yield effect from 1977 to 2016.

    Long-term effects of crop succession, soil tillage and climate on wheat yield and soil properties · 2019

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Wheat grain yield was unaffected by tillage and cover crop management.

    Crop and cattle responses to tillage systems for integrated crop–livestock production in the Southern Piedmont, USA · 2007

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Reduced tillage decreased wheat yield by 14%.

    Tillage effects on weed communities in an organic winter wheat–sunflower–spelt cropping sequence · 2011

    Opposite direction

1,405 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.