Paper · 2021 · Comunicata Scientiae

Tank mixture of pesticides for Tuta absoluta and Neoleucinodes elegantalis control in tomato crop

César Henrique Souza Zandonadi; Sérgio Macedo Silva; Thales Cassemiro Alves; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The use of pesticides in tank mixtures is important to reduce application costs and increase pest control, mainly. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of manganese foliar fertilizers on the effectiveness of the chlorantraniliprole (Chlt) to control tomato leaf miner and tomato fruit borer in tomato crop and to evaluate the possible effects of these mixtures on plant physiology. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse, on randomized block design with eight treatments and four replications each. The treatments were: 1 – Chlt; 2 – Chlt + MnSO4; 3 – Chlt + Mn(NO3)2; 4- Chlt + Break-Thru (BTH); 5 - Chlt + MnSO4 + BTH; 6 – Chlt + Mn(NO3)2 + BTH; 7 – Chlt + MnSO4 + Mn(NO3)2 + BTH; 8 - Control. The physical chemical properties, physiological effects, pesticide efficacy and yield were evaluated. The results showed that the use of chlorantraniliprole in mixture with adjuvant and foliar fertilizers did not influence its efficacy against Tuta absoluta and Neoleucinodes elegantalis. Also, the mixture did not influence the chlorophyll content and all the nutrients content were in appropriate levels. We conclude that tank mixture with manganese foliar fertilizers do not have influence over the efficacy nor the physiological characteristics. The physical chemical evaluations changed according to each manganese salt add in the mixture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole mixtures did not alter efficacy against Tuta absoluta.

Treatment
chlorantraniliprole in mixture with adjuvant and foliar fertilizerse0t0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae0t0pest
Outcome
efficacy against Tuta absolutae0t0
Direction
did not influencee0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of chlorantraniliprole in mixture with adjuvant and foliar fertilizers did not influence its efficacy against Tuta absoluta and Neoleucinodes elegantalis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole mixtures did not alter efficacy against Neoleucinodes elegantalis.

Treatment
chlorantraniliprole in mixture with adjuvant and foliar fertilizerse0t0
Interactor
Neoleucinodes elegantalisNeoleucinodes elegantalise0t0pest
Outcome
efficacy against Tuta absoluta and Neoleucinodes elegantalise0t0
Direction
did not influencee0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Neoleucinodes elegantalis
Neoleucinodes elegantalis · InteractorDr M. Alma Solis, Systematic Entomology Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville (US) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of chlorantraniliprole in mixture with adjuvant and foliar fertilizers did not influence its efficacy against Tuta absoluta and Neoleucinodes elegantalis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixture did not alter chlorophyll content.

Treatment
mixturee0t0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0t0
Direction
did not influencee0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mixture did not influence the chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient content remained at appropriate levels with the mixture.

Outcome
nutrients contente0t0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the nutrients content were in appropriate levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1128 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The physical chemical evaluations varied by manganese salt.

Treatment
manganese salte0t0
Outcome
physical chemical evaluationse0t0
Direction
changede0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The physical chemical evaluations changed according to each manganese salt add in the mixture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1367 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑

chlorantraniliprole · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.