Paper · 2010 · Shenyang Nongye Daxue xuebao

Effect of Food Waste Compost on Tomato Yield and Quality

Yang Li-juana

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this paper,effects of different organic manures such as food waste compost,chicken manure,pig manure,horse manure,bull manure and chemical fertilizers on tomato growing development,yield and fruit quality were studied in pot experiment.The results showed that organic manure could promote the growth and development of tomato,in which plant height,stem diameter and fruit diameter were higher in food waste compost treatments than other treatments.Tomato yields were 863.60 g·pot-1,824.99 g·pot-1 816.25 g·pot-1,766.93 g·pot-1,672.01 g·pot-1,659.08 g·pot-1,616.73 g·pot-1 in food waste compost,pig manure,bull manure,horse manure,chemical fertilizer,chicken manure and control treatment,respectively.The aboveground biomass in food waste compost disposal was the highest,which fresh weight and dry weight were 353.24 g·pot-1,45.83 g·pot-1,respectively,and the order was reduced with pig manure,bull manure,horse manure,chicken manure,chemical fertilizer and control treatment.The highest contents of Vc and soluble sugar of tomato were obtained in food waste compost treatment.The sugar/acid of tomato with 7.73 in food waste compost treatment was significantly higher than the other treatments.In vegetable cultivation,it could be an alternative to chemical fertilizer and other animal manure to promote soil nutrient for tomato growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure promoted tomato growth and development.

Treatment
organic manuree0
Outcome
growth and development of tomatoe0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“organic manure could promote the growth and development of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Food waste compost produced higher plant height, stem diameter and fruit diameter than other treatments.

Treatment
food waste compost treatmentse0
Outcome
plant height,stem diameter and fruit diametere0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant height,stem diameter and fruit diameter were higher in food waste compost treatments than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–450 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield under food waste compost was 863.60 g·pot-1.

Treatment
food waste composte0
Outcome
Tomato yieldse0
Value
863.60 g·pot-1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tomato yields were 863.60 g·pot-1,824.99 g·pot-1 816.25 g·pot-1,766.93 g·pot-1,672.01 g·pot-1,659.08 g·pot-1,616.73 g·pot-1 in food waste compost,pig manure,bull manure,horse manure,chemical fertilizer,chicken manure and control treatment,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–702 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield under pig manure was 824.99 g·pot-1.

Treatment
pig manuree0
Outcome
Tomato yieldse0
Value
824.99 g·pot-1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tomato yields were 863.60 g·pot-1,824.99 g·pot-1 816.25 g·pot-1,766.93 g·pot-1,672.01 g·pot-1,659.08 g·pot-1,616.73 g·pot-1 in food waste compost,pig manure,bull manure,horse manure,chemical fertilizer,chicken manure and control treatment,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–702 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield under bull manure was 816.25 g·pot-1.

Treatment
bull manuree0
Outcome
Tomato yieldse0
Value
816.25 g·pot-1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tomato yields were 863.60 g·pot-1,824.99 g·pot-1 816.25 g·pot-1,766.93 g·pot-1,672.01 g·pot-1,659.08 g·pot-1,616.73 g·pot-1 in food waste compost,pig manure,bull manure,horse manure,chemical fertilizer,chicken manure and control treatment,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–702 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield under horse manure was 766.93 g·pot-1.

Treatment
horse manuree0
Outcome
Tomato yieldse0
Value
766.93 g·pot-1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tomato yields were 863.60 g·pot-1,824.99 g·pot-1 816.25 g·pot-1,766.93 g·pot-1,672.01 g·pot-1,659.08 g·pot-1,616.73 g·pot-1 in food waste compost,pig manure,bull manure,horse manure,chemical fertilizer,chicken manure and control treatment,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–702 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield under chemical fertilizer was 672.01 g·pot-1.

Treatment
chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
Tomato yieldse0
Value
672.01 g·pot-1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tomato yields were 863.60 g·pot-1,824.99 g·pot-1 816.25 g·pot-1,766.93 g·pot-1,672.01 g·pot-1,659.08 g·pot-1,616.73 g·pot-1 in food waste compost,pig manure,bull manure,horse manure,chemical fertilizer,chicken manure and control treatment,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–702 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield under chicken manure was 659.08 g·pot-1.

Treatment
chicken manuree0
Outcome
Tomato yieldse0
Value
659.08 g·pot-1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tomato yields were 863.60 g·pot-1,824.99 g·pot-1 816.25 g·pot-1,766.93 g·pot-1,672.01 g·pot-1,659.08 g·pot-1,616.73 g·pot-1 in food waste compost,pig manure,bull manure,horse manure,chemical fertilizer,chicken manure and control treatment,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–702 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield under control treatment was 616.73 g·pot-1.

Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
Tomato yieldse0
Value
616.73 g·pot-1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tomato yields were 863.60 g·pot-1,824.99 g·pot-1 816.25 g·pot-1,766.93 g·pot-1,672.01 g·pot-1,659.08 g·pot-1,616.73 g·pot-1 in food waste compost,pig manure,bull manure,horse manure,chemical fertilizer,chicken manure and control treatment,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–702 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aboveground fresh weight under food waste compost was 353.24 g·pot-1.

Outcome
fresh weighte0
Value
353.24 g·pot-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“fresh weight and dry weight were 353.24 g·pot-1,45.83 g·pot-1,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–854 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aboveground dry weight under food waste compost was 45.83 g·pot-1.

Outcome
dry weighte0
Value
45.83 g·pot-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“fresh weight and dry weight were 353.24 g·pot-1,45.83 g·pot-1,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–854 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aboveground biomass declined in the reported order from pig manure through control.

Outcome
the ordere0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
pig manure,bull manure,horse manure,chicken manure,chemical fertilizer and control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“the order was reduced with pig manure,bull manure,horse manure,chicken manure,chemical fertilizer and control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Food waste compost produced the highest tomato vitamin C and soluble sugar contents.

Treatment
food waste compost treatmente0
Outcome
contents of Vc and soluble sugar of tomatoe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest contents of Vc and soluble sugar of tomato were obtained in food waste compost treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1079 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Food waste compost gave a tomato sugar/acid ratio of 7.73, significantly higher than other treatments.

Treatment
food waste compost treatmente0
Outcome
sugar/acid of tomatoe0
Direction
highere0
Value
7.73e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“The sugar/acid of tomato with 7.73 in food waste compost treatment was significantly higher than the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1197 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Food waste compost was proposed as an alternative fertilizer for tomato growth.

Outcome
alternative to chemical fertilizer and other animal manuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“it could be an alternative to chemical fertilizer and other animal manure to promote soil nutrient for tomato growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1339 · show in text ↑

fertilization · organism · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 30 positive, 4 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

fertilization · physiology: osmolytes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 48 positive, 1 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.