Paper · 2021 · Physiologia Plantarum

Different abscisic acid‐deficient mutants show unique morphological and hydraulic responses to high air humidity

Sheona N. Innes; Knut Asbjørn Solhaug; Sissel Torre; et al.

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract High relative humidity (RH) perturbs plant growth, stomatal functioning and abscisic acid (ABA) homeostasis, but the role of ABA in this physiological regulation is equivocal. To determine the role(s) of ABA in plant responses to high RH, wild‐type (WT) tomato and barley plants and their respective ABA‐deficient mutants flacca and Az34 (which are mutated in the same locus of the ABA biosynthesis pathway) were grown in contrasting RHs (60% and 90%) to measure biomass partitioning, stomatal traits and water relations. Surprisingly, growth RH did not affect foliar ABA levels in either species. While Az34 showed similar stomatal size and density as WT plants, flacca had larger and more abundant stomata. High RH increased stomatal size in tomato, but decreased it in barley, and decreased stomatal density in tomato, but not in barley. Altered stomatal responses in ABA‐deficient plants to high RH had little effect on tomato photosynthesis, but Az34 barley showed lower photosynthesis. ABA deficiency decreased relative shoot growth rate (RGR SHOOT ) in both species, yet this was counteracted by high RH increasing leaf water status in tomato, but not in barley. High RH increased RGR SHOOT in flacca , but not in WT tomatoes, while having no effect on RGR SHOOT in barley, but affecting barley net assimilation rate, leaf area ratio (LAR) and specific leaf area in an ABA‐dependent manner. ABA‐RH interaction affected leaf development in tomato only. Thus, different crop species show variable responses to both high RH and ABA deficiency, making it difficult to generalise on the role of ABA in growth regulation at contrasting RHs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth humidity did not affect foliar ABA levels in tomato or barley.

Treatment
growth RHe0
Outcome
foliar ABA levelse0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“growth RH did not affect foliar ABA levels in either species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–606 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The flacca mutant had larger and more abundant stomata than wild type tomato.

Material
flaccae0
Outcome
larger and more abundant stomatae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“flacca had larger and more abundant stomata.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity increased stomatal size in tomato.

Treatment
High RHe0
Outcome
stomatal sizee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High RH increased stomatal size in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity decreased stomatal size in barley.

Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorOutcome

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased it in barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity decreased stomatal density in tomato.

Outcome
stomatal densitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased stomatal density in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity did not decrease stomatal density in barley.

Outcome
stomatal densitye0
Direction
note0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased stomatal density in tomato, but not in barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–849 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA-deficient Az34 barley had lower photosynthesis.

Material
Az34e0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Az34 barley showed lower photosynthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1000 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA deficiency decreased relative shoot growth rate in tomato and barley.

Treatment
ABA deficiencye0
Outcome
relative shoot growth ratee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“ABA deficiency decreased relative shoot growth rate (RGR SHOOT ) in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity increased leaf water status in tomato.

Treatment
high RHe0
Outcome
leaf water statuse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high RH increasing leaf water status in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity increased shoot relative growth rate in flacca tomato.

Material
flaccae0
Treatment
High RHe0
Outcome
RGR SHOOTe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“High RH increased RGR SHOOT in flacca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity did not affect shoot growth rate in barley.

Outcome
RGR SHOOTe0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“having no effect on RGR SHOOT in barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1288 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ABA and humidity interaction affected leaf development in tomato only.

Treatment
ABA‐RH interactione0
Outcome
leaf developmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ABA‐RH interaction affected leaf development in tomato only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1467 · show in text ↑

humidity · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.