Paper · 2021 · Research Society and Development

Use of organic waste biochar as an innovative alternative for increasing agricultural productivity in small rural communities

Maria Isidória Silva Gonzaga; Danyelle Chaves Figueiredo de Souza; José Carlos de Jesus Santos

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Biochar, pyrolyzed organic waste for agronomic and environmental purposes, is a viable alternative to improve soil quality in small farm areas in the state of Sergipe, where there is a shortage of water and chemical inputs. This study evaluated the effect of single and simultaneous application of doses (t ha-1) of sewage sludge (SS) and dry coconut shell (CS) on some soil properties and sunflower growth and nutrition (Helianthus annuus L.), in São Cristóvão-SE. The experiment was carried out in a completely randomized scheme, with 6 treatments (1. SE60CS0; 2. SE30CS0; 3. SE20CS10; 4. SE10CS20; 5. SE0CS30; 6. Control (without biochar) and 5 repetitions. In the soil, pH, electrical conductivity, organic carbon, and P, K, and Na concentrations were determined. In the plant, biomass, height, chlorophyll content, and N, P, and K were evaluated. Alone, coconut biochar increased the soil pH but reduced plant N. The sludge biochar did not increase soil pH but improved the soil N and P levels, plant growth (25%), and inflorescence (33%), indicating greater benefits of joint application. In addition to improving productivity, biochar, both from sewage sludge and dry coconut shell, can improve the destination and management of these residues and, at the same time, promote the recycling of nutrients in soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coconut biochar alone increased soil pH.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
coconut biochare0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alone, coconut biochar increased the soil pH but reduced plant N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–916 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower growth and nutrition (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coconut biochar alone reduced plant N.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
coconut biochare0
Outcome
plant Ne0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alone, coconut biochar increased the soil pH but reduced plant N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–916 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower growth and nutrition (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge biochar did not increase soil pH.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
sludge biochare0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sludge biochar did not increase soil pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–961 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower growth and nutrition (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge biochar improved soil N and P levels.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
sludge biochare0
Outcome
soil N and P levelse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sludge biochar did not increase soil pH but improved the soil N and P levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–998 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower growth and nutrition (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge biochar improved sunflower growth by 25%.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
sludge biochare0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sludge biochar did not increase soil pH but improved the soil N and P levels, plant growth (25%), and inflorescence (33%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1043 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower growth and nutrition (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge biochar improved sunflower inflorescence by 33%.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
sludge biochare0
Outcome
inflorescencee0
Direction
improvede0
Value
33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sludge biochar did not increase soil pH but improved the soil N and P levels, plant growth (25%), and inflorescence (33%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1043 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower growth and nutrition (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–443 · show in text ↑

organic · soil: chemistry · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

organic · nutrient: content · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

biochar · soil: chemistry · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

biochar · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

organic · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

biochar · nutrient: content · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.