Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Valorizing Combustible and Compostable Fractions of Municipal Solid Waste to Biochar and Compost as an Alternative to Chemical Fertilizer for Improving Soil Health and Sunflower Yield

Samreen Aslam; Aisha Nazir

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Reduced reliance on synthetic chemical fertilizers necessarily requires using renewable biomaterial-derived soil organic amendments (SOAs) in agriculture for sustained retention of nutrients through improvement in the soil organic matter (SOM). SOM replenishment through SOAs derived from wasted materials could help in its valorization by furthering the sustainability prospects of agronomic crop production systems. In the current study, compost (CP) and biochar (BC) were derived as SOAs from combustible and compostable fractions of municipal solid waste (MSW) for their potential valorization by adding SOAs as potential sustainable sources of nutrients as a replacement of chemical fertilizers (CF) for sunflower crops cultivated in potted soils. The experimental design included quadruplicated soil application of MSW-derived BC and CP in discrete and combined forms, each in three doses (% w:w), viz., low (L), medium (M), and high (H), i.e., BC-L, BC-M, BC-H; CP-L, CP-M, CP-H; and BC + CP-L, BC + CP-M, BC-CP-H. The results showed that, compared to the control (soil only), the sunflower growth and harvestable yield were significantly greater in BC + CF with a medium dose and were comparable to the growth and yield obtained in soils with CF. Sunflower growth in the discrete SOAs remained less than in the combined SOAs (BC + CP) and was attributed to the comprehensive soil health improvement rendered by the applied SOAs. The soil health improvement factors included SOM, CEC, and concentrations of total and available NPK. The dose-effect comparison of the SOAs showed highly variable trends, i.e., the sunflower growth did not correspond with the increase in dose of the SOAs. It is concluded that the combined application of BC + CP derived from MSW components at a medium dose could act as a potential alternative to CF. The developed approach resulted in MSW valorization, which improved soil health and yielded a better sunflower crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium-dose BC plus CF significantly increased sunflower growth against soil-only control.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
BC + CF with a medium dosee0
Outcome
sunflower growthe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
control (soil only)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared to the control (soil only), the sunflower growth and harvestable yield were significantly greater in BC + CF with a medium dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium-dose BC plus CF significantly increased harvestable yield against soil-only control.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
BC + CF with a medium dosee0
Outcome
harvestable yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
control (soil only)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared to the control (soil only), the sunflower growth and harvestable yield were significantly greater in BC + CF with a medium dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth and yield under medium-dose BC plus CF were comparable to CF treatment.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
BC + CF with a medium dosee1
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
soils with CFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were comparable to the growth and yield obtained in soils with CF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1253 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower growth and harvestable yield were significantly greater in BC + CF with a medium dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower growth with discrete amendments was lower than with combined BC plus CP.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
discrete SOAse0
Outcome
Sunflower growthe0
Direction
less thane0
Comparator
combined SOAs (BC + CP)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sunflower growth in the discrete SOAs remained less than in the combined SOAs (BC + CP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1342 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attribute the growth contrast to comprehensive soil health improvement.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
applied SOAse0
Outcome
Sunflower growthe1
Qualifier
comprehensive soil health improvemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was attributed to the comprehensive soil health improvement rendered by the applied SOAs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1435 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sunflower growth in the discrete SOAs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 168–183 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied amendments improved soil organic matter, CEC and total and available NPK.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
SOM, CEC, and concentrations of total and available NPKe0
Direction
improvemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil health improvement factors included SOM, CEC, and concentrations of total and available NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1537 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 168–183 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower growth did not track increasing amendment dose.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
SOAse0
Outcome
sunflower growthe0
Direction
did not corresponde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the sunflower growth did not correspond with the increase in dose of the SOAs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1692 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend medium-dose combined BC plus CP as a possible alternative to chemical fertilizer.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
combined application of BC + CP derived from MSW components at a medium dosee0
Outcome
potential alternative to CFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combined application of BC + CP derived from MSW components at a medium dose could act as a potential alternative to CF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1715–1838 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 168–183 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors report the developed approach valorized waste and improved soil health and sunflower crop performance.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Outcome
better sunflower crope0
Direction
bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The developed approach resulted in MSW valorization, which improved soil health and yielded a better sunflower crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1840–1955 · show in text ↑

in vitro · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

biochar · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

organic · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

in vitro · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 22 positive, 14 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

fertilization · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

146 papers: 134 positive, 12 negative or no effect

133 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

142 papers more in this group

See all 146 papers →

fertilization · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

365 papers: 344 positive, 21 negative or no effect

343 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

361 papers more in this group

See all 365 papers →

biochar · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.