Paper · 2016 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Effects of biochar and fertilizer management on sunflower (Helianthus annuusL.) feedstock and soil properties

Matthew Pfister; Subhrajit Saha

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The need for bioenergy is increasing with increase in global energy demand, and sustainable soil and fertilizer management practices for bioenergy feedstock production are gaining importance. In this greenhouse study, we evaluated the effects of biochar and fertilizer nitrogen on soil and energy crop sunflower (Helianthus annuus L. var. Giganteus). Sunflower plants were treated with three rates of biochar, control (0 Mg ha−1), low (25 Mg ha−1) and high (50 Mg ha−1), and three rates of fertilizers, 0% (control), 50% (low) and 100% (high) of the recommended nitrogen dose. Plant height, quality (chlorophyll content), biomass yield, feedstock energy, ash content and tissue nutrients were measured along with soil moisture and pH. Results showed an 11% increase in mean plant height under low biochar compared to control biochar-treated plants. High nitrogen treatment produced 26% and 18% more stalk and total above-ground plant (whole plant) biomass, respectively, compared to the control nitrogen treatment. High biochar treatment resulted in higher soil moisture holding, but lower soil pH than the control biochar treatment. Plant quality, energy and ash contents were not affected by either biochar or nitrogen. The plant tissue analysis provides a complete tissue macro- and micronutrient information on sunflower cultivar Giganteus, which was not done previously.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low biochar increased mean sunflower height by 11% versus control biochar.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
low biochare0
Outcome
mean plant heighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
11%e0
Comparator
control biochar-treated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed an 11% increase in mean plant height under low biochar compared to control biochar-treated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–848 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen increased stalk biomass by 26% relative to control nitrogen.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
High nitrogen treatmente0
Outcome
stalke0
Direction
moree0
Value
26%e0
Comparator
control nitrogen treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High nitrogen treatment produced 26% and 18% more stalk and total above-ground plant (whole plant) biomass, respectively, compared to the control nitrogen treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen increased whole-plant above-ground biomass by 18%.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
High nitrogen treatmente0
Outcome
total above-ground plant (whole plant) biomasse0
Direction
moree0
Value
18%e0
Comparator
control nitrogen treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High nitrogen treatment produced 26% and 18% more stalk and total above-ground plant (whole plant) biomass, respectively, compared to the control nitrogen treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High biochar increased soil moisture holding relative to control biochar.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
High biochar treatmente0
Outcome
soil moisture holdinge0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control biochar treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High biochar treatment resulted in higher soil moisture holding, but lower soil pH than the control biochar treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High biochar lowered soil pH relative to control biochar.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
High biochar treatmente0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control biochar treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High biochar treatment resulted in higher soil moisture holding, but lower soil pH than the control biochar treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and nitrogen did not affect plant quality, energy or ash contents.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
biochar or nitrogene0
Outcome
Plant quality, energy and ash contentse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant quality, energy and ash contents were not affected by either biochar or nitrogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–57 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue analysis supplied a complete macro- and micronutrient profile for sunflower cultivar Giganteus.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Material
Giganteuse0
Outcome
complete tissue macro- and micronutrient informatione0
Comparator
previouslye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant tissue analysis provides a complete tissue macro- and micronutrient information on sunflower cultivar Giganteus, which was not done previously.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1375 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

76 papers: 63 positive, 13 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

biochar · quality: grain · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

biochar · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

biochar · soil: physics · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.