Paper · 2015 · The Journal of Agricultural Life and Environmental Sciences

Ultraviolet Light (UV-C) Irradiation Reduced Postharvest Fungal Incidence of Cherry Tomato

Mohammad Zahirul Islam; Mahmuda Akter Mele; I S Kim; et al.

8
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was conducted to reduce the postharvest fungal incidence of cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Unicorn) by ultraviolet light (UV-C) irradiation in MA storage. Hydroponic grown red maturity stage of cherry tomatoes was collected from Gangwon province. Tomato fruits were inoculated with Botrytis cinerea (grey mould). Afterwards, ultraviolet irradiation (254 nm, UV-C) of 7, 14, 21 and 28 kJ/m2 treated to tomato fruits. And treated UV-C tomatoes were packed with MA condition (20,000 cc/m2.day.atm O2 permeability film) to store at 5˚C for 20 days with 85% relative humidity. The 28 kJ treatment which showed the best visual quality maintained around 3.30-6.60% of carbon dioxide concentration and 16.08-17.50% oxygen and 0.26-1.11 μL/L ethylene during the storage. As storage periods progressed, the fresh weight loss was increased but did not exceed the maximum permissible of fresh weight loss. The 28 kJ performed the highest firmness among the treatments. The UV-C treatments demonstrated the less fungal incidence than control. The 28 kJ treatments exhibited the best visual quality, firmness, titratable acidity and less fungal incidence among the treatments. So, ultraviolet (UV-C) irradiation reduced postharvest fungal incidence of cherry tomato.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 28 kJ treatment maintained carbon dioxide at 3.30-6.60% during storage.

Treatment
28 kJ treatmente0
Outcome
carbon dioxide concentratione0
Value
3.30-6.60%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 28 kJ treatment which showed the best visual quality maintained around 3.30-6.60% of carbon dioxide concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–718 · show in text ↑
e1

“cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Unicorn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 28 kJ treatment maintained oxygen at 16.08-17.50% during storage.

Treatment
28 kJ treatmente1
Outcome
oxygene0
Value
16.08-17.50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“16.08-17.50% oxygen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–742 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 28 kJ treatment which showed the best visual quality maintained around 3.30-6.60% of carbon dioxide concentration and 16.08-17.50% oxygen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–742 · show in text ↑
e2

“postharvest fungal incidence of cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Unicorn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 28 kJ treatment maintained ethylene at 0.26-1.11 μL/L during storage.

Treatment
28 kJ treatmente1
Outcome
ethylenee0
Value
0.26-1.11 μL/Le0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.26-1.11 μL/L ethylene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–770 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 28 kJ treatment which showed the best visual quality maintained around 3.30-6.60% of carbon dioxide concentration and 16.08-17.50% oxygen and 0.26-1.11 μL/L ethylene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–770 · show in text ↑
e2

“postharvest fungal incidence of cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Unicorn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–128 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh weight loss rose over storage time but stayed below the permissible maximum.

Outcome
fresh weight losse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
did not exceed the maximum permissible of fresh weight losse0
Setting
storage periodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As storage periods progressed, the fresh weight loss was increased but did not exceed the maximum permissible of fresh weight loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–921 · show in text ↑
e1

“postharvest fungal incidence of cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Unicorn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 28 kJ treatment gave the highest firmness.

Treatment
28 kJe0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 28 kJ performed the highest firmness among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–984 · show in text ↑
e1

“postharvest fungal incidence of cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Unicorn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C treatments reduced fungal incidence relative to control.

Treatment
UV-C treatmentse0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae2pathogen
Outcome
fungal incidencee0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The UV-C treatments demonstrated the less fungal incidence than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1057 · show in text ↑
e1

“postharvest fungal incidence of cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Unicorn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–128 · show in text ↑
e2

“Botrytis cinerea (grey mould)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 28 kJ treatment gave the best visual quality and titratable acidity among treatments.

Treatment
28 kJ treatmentse0
Outcome
visual quality, firmness, titratable aciditye0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 28 kJ treatments exhibited the best visual quality, firmness, titratable acidity and less fungal incidence among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1190 · show in text ↑
e1

“postharvest fungal incidence of cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Unicorn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 28 kJ treatment had less fungal incidence than other treatments.

Treatment
28 kJ treatmentse0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae2pathogen
Outcome
fungal incidencee0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 28 kJ treatments exhibited the best visual quality, firmness, titratable acidity and less fungal incidence among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1190 · show in text ↑
e1

“postharvest fungal incidence of cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Unicorn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–128 · show in text ↑
e2

“Botrytis cinerea (grey mould)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–340 · show in text ↑

uv · Botrytis cinerea · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.