Paper · 2021 · Plant and Soil

Green manure effect on the ability of native and inoculated soil bacteria to mobilize zinc for wheat uptake (Triticum aestivum L.)

Benjamin Costerousse; Joel Quattrini; Roman Grüter; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Green manuring can increase the plant available fraction of zinc (Zn) in soil, making it a potential approach to increase wheat Zn concentrations and fight human Zn deficiency. We tested whether green manure increases the ability of both the native soil bacteria and inoculated Zn solubilizing bacteria (ZSB) to mobilize Zn. Methods Wheat was grown in a pot experiment with the following three factors (with or without); (i) clover addition; (ii) soil x-ray irradiation (i.e. elimination of the whole soil biota followed by re-inoculation with the native soil bacteria); and (iii) ZSB inoculation. The incorporation of clover in both the irradiated and the ZSB treatments allowed us to test green manure effects on the mobilization of Zn by indigenous soil bacteria as well as by inoculated strains. Results Inoculation with ZSB did neither increase soil Zn availability nor wheat Zn uptake. The highest soil Zn availabilities were found when clover was incorporated, particularly in the irradiated soils (containing only soil bacteria). This was partly associated with the stimulation of bacterial activity during the decomposition of the incorporated green manure. Conclusion The results support that the activity of soil bacteria is intimately involved in the mobilization of Zn following the incorporation of green manure.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Zn solubilizing bacteria (ZSB) did not increase soil Zn availability or wheat Zn uptake.

Treatment
Inoculation with ZSBe1
Interactor
ZSBe1symbiont
Outcome
soil Zn availability nor wheat Zn uptakee1
Direction
neither increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Inoculation with ZSB did neither increase soil Zn availability nor wheat Zn uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–907 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest soil Zn availabilities were found when clover was incorporated, particularly in the irradiated soils.

Treatment
clover was incorporatede2
Outcome
soil Zn availabilitiese2
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
particularly in the irradiated soilse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat uptake (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–130 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest soil Zn availabilities were found when clover was incorporated, particularly in the irradiated soils (containing only soil bacteria)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1053 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The clover effect on soil Zn availability was partly associated with stimulated bacterial activity during green manure decomposition.

Outcome
soil Zn availabilitiese2
Qualifier
stimulation of bacterial activity during the decomposition of the incorporated green manuree3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat uptake (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–130 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest soil Zn availabilities were found when clover was incorporated, particularly in the irradiated soils (containing only soil bacteria)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1053 · show in text ↑
e3

“This was partly associated with the stimulation of bacterial activity during the decomposition of the incorporated green manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1182 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil bacteria activity is intimately involved in Zn mobilization following green manure incorporation.

Outcome
mobilization of Zne4
Qualifier
activity of soil bacteriae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat uptake (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–130 · show in text ↑
e4

“The results support that the activity of soil bacteria is intimately involved in the mobilization of Zn following the incorporation of green manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1342 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 347 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 263 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

273 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.