Paper · 2019 · IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES

EFFECT OF NEEM LEAVES EXTRACT AND ORGANIC FERTILIZER IN THE PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY OF TWO POTATO CULTIVARS

Shayaa Hussein

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
16
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This research was conducted at the fields of College of Agriculture, University of Baghdad during spring and fall seasons 2017 to study the effect of addition methods of Neem leaves extract and organic fertilizer in the productivity and quality of two potatoes cultivars. The experiment was carried out using split plot arrangement within Randomized Complete Block Design, with three replicates. The experiment included two Potato cultivars ,Burren (V1) and Riviera(V2) as the main factors and nutritional treatments as follow: control treatment T1, Recommend fertilizer T2, cows manure 5% of soil weight T3, irrigation with cows manure T4, cows manure 5%of soil weight+recommend chemical fertilizer T5, Spraying the Neem leaves extract with a concentration of (2.5 g L-1)+cows manure 5% T6, Spraying the Neem leaves extract with a concentration of (5g L-1)+cows manure 5% T7, Spraying the Neem leaves extract with a concentration of (7.5 g L-1) + cows manure 5% T8, irrigation with Neem leaves extract with 25% concentration +cows manure 5% T9, irrigation with Neem leaves extract with 50% concentration+ cows manure 5% T10, irrigation with Neem leaves extract with 75% concentration of concentrated solution for Neem leaves extract+cows manure 5% T11 and irrigation with Neem leaves extract with 100% concentration+cows manure 5% T12.as sub plots, T8 treatment was significantly superior in the total yield, compared with the lowest average of total yield in control treatment T1, The V1 produced a significantly highest total yield and the marketable yield for plant compared to V2 for two seasons, The T8V1 interaction treatment was significantly superiority in the increase of total yield compared to the lowest average for T1V2 treatment, the response of two potato cultivars differed to the nutrition treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 significantly increased total yield relative to T1.

Treatment
Spraying the Neem leaves extract with a concentration of (7.5 g L-1) + cows manure 5%e1
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
control treatment T1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T8 treatment was significantly superior in the total yield, compared with the lowest average of total yield in control treatment T1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spraying the Neem leaves extract with a concentration of (7.5 g L-1) + cows manure 5% T8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–965 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

V1 had significantly higher total and marketable yield per plant than V2 in both seasons.

Material
V1e0
Outcome
total yield and the marketable yield for plante0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
two seasonse0
Comparator
V2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The V1 produced a significantly highest total yield and the marketable yield for plant compared to V2 for two seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1600 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8V1 significantly increased total yield compared with T1V2.

Treatment
T8V1 interaction treatmente0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
T1V2 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The T8V1 interaction treatment was significantly superiority in the increase of total yield compared to the lowest average for T1V2 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1602–1743 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The potato cultivars differed in response to nutrition treatments.

Treatment
nutrition treatmentse0
Outcome
responsee0
Direction
differede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response of two potato cultivars differed to the nutrition treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1818 · show in text ↑

Azadirachta indica · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 35 positive, 4 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

application · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

191 papers: 177 positive, 14 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

187 papers more in this group

See all 191 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

450 papers: 394 positive, 56 negative or no effect

393 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

446 papers more in this group

See all 450 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.