Paper · 2021 · Agriculture

Short-Term Carbon Sequestration and Changes of Soil Organic Carbon Pools in Rice under Integrated Nutrient Management in India

Mousumi Ghosh; Waqar Ashiq; Hiteshkumar Bhogilal Vasava; et al.

15
claims
43
verbatim quotes
30
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

While the capability of integrated nutrient management (INM) in rice systems has been adequately studied, little is known about the related short-term carbon sequestration and changes in soil carbon fractions. Our study examined the responses of organic carbon pools, carbon sequestration and rice yields after application of different organic manures combined with chemical fertilizers in a rice–rice (Oryza sativa L.) cropping system in the red and laterite agro-climatic zones of West Bengal, India. The treatments included non-fertilized control; rice straw (RS) + nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer (NPK); Gliricidia (GL) + NPK; farmyard manure (FYM) + NPK; vermicompost (VC) + NPK; and NPK only. Rice straw + NPK treatment resulted in the highest total organic carbon and passive pool of carbon. Vermicompost + NPK treatment resulted in the highest oxidizable organic carbon (0.69%), dissolved organic carbon (0.007%) and microbial biomass carbon (0.01%), followed by FYM + NPK, GL + NPK and RS + NPK as compared to control. Rice straw + NPK sequestered the highest amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) as the total organic carbon (91.10 t ha−1) and passive pool of carbon (85.64 t ha−1), whereas VC + NPK resulted in the highest amount of CO2 (10.24 t ha−1) being sequestered as the active pool of carbon, followed by FYM + NPK (8.33 t ha−1) and GL + NPK (7.22 t ha−1). The application of both NPK only and VC + NPK treatments resulted in the highest grain yields over the three cropping seasons. In spite of high carbon sequestration being observed in more recalcitrant carbon pools, RS + NPK resulted in little increase (3.52 t ha−1) in rice yield over the short term. The results of this study suggest that the short-term changes of soil carbon fractions and carbon sequestration primarily depend on the type of organic manure used. Vermicompost, FYM and GL provide more labile carbon, which can improve rice yield over the short term. However, it is suggested to explore the dynamics of different carbon fractions, carbon sequestration in different pools and rice yields over longer periods of time.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw plus NPK gave the highest total organic carbon.

Treatment
Rice straw + NPKe0
Outcome
total organic carbone0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice straw + NPK treatment resulted in the highest total organic carbon and passive pool of carbon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw plus NPK gave the highest passive carbon pool.

Treatment
Rice straw + NPKe0
Outcome
passive pool of carbone0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice straw + NPK treatment resulted in the highest total organic carbon and passive pool of carbon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost plus NPK gave the highest oxidizable organic carbon at 0.69%.

Treatment
Vermicompost + NPKe0
Outcome
oxidizable organic carbone0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.69%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vermicompost + NPK treatment resulted in the highest oxidizable organic carbon (0.69%), dissolved organic carbon (0.007%) and microbial biomass carbon (0.01%), followed by FYM + NPK, GL + NPK and RS + NPK as compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost plus NPK gave the highest dissolved organic carbon at 0.007%.

Treatment
Vermicompost + NPKe0
Outcome
dissolved organic carbone0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.007%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vermicompost + NPK treatment resulted in the highest oxidizable organic carbon (0.69%), dissolved organic carbon (0.007%) and microbial biomass carbon (0.01%), followed by FYM + NPK, GL + NPK and RS + NPK as compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost plus NPK gave the highest microbial biomass carbon at 0.01%.

Treatment
Vermicompost + NPKe0
Outcome
microbial biomass carbone0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.01%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vermicompost + NPK treatment resulted in the highest oxidizable organic carbon (0.69%), dissolved organic carbon (0.007%) and microbial biomass carbon (0.01%), followed by FYM + NPK, GL + NPK and RS + NPK as compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw plus NPK sequestered 91.10 t ha−1 CO2 as total organic carbon.

Treatment
Rice straw + NPKe0
Outcome
carbon dioxide (CO2) as the total organic carbone0
Direction
higheste0
Value
91.10 t ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice straw + NPK sequestered the highest amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) as the total organic carbon (91.10 t ha−1) and passive pool of carbon (85.64 t ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1198 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw plus NPK sequestered 85.64 t ha−1 CO2 in the passive pool.

Treatment
Rice straw + NPKe0
Outcome
passive pool of carbone0
Direction
higheste0
Value
85.64 t ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice straw + NPK sequestered the highest amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) as the total organic carbon (91.10 t ha−1) and passive pool of carbon (85.64 t ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1198 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost plus NPK sequestered the most active-pool CO2, 10.24 t ha−1.

Treatment
VC + NPKe0
Outcome
CO2e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.24 t ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“VC + NPK resulted in the highest amount of CO2 (10.24 t ha−1) being sequestered as the active pool of carbon, followed by FYM + NPK (8.33 t ha−1) and GL + NPK (7.22 t ha−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1381 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus NPK sequestered 8.33 t ha−1 CO2 in the active pool.

Treatment
FYM + NPKe0
Outcome
CO2e0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
8.33 t ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“VC + NPK resulted in the highest amount of CO2 (10.24 t ha−1) being sequestered as the active pool of carbon, followed by FYM + NPK (8.33 t ha−1) and GL + NPK (7.22 t ha−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1381 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GL plus NPK sequestered 7.22 t ha−1 CO2 in the active pool.

Treatment
GL + NPKe0
Outcome
CO2e0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
7.22 t ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“VC + NPK resulted in the highest amount of CO2 (10.24 t ha−1) being sequestered as the active pool of carbon, followed by FYM + NPK (8.33 t ha−1) and GL + NPK (7.22 t ha−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1381 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK alone produced among the highest grain yields over three seasons.

Treatment
NPK onlye0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of both NPK only and VC + NPK treatments resulted in the highest grain yields over the three cropping seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1508 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VC plus NPK produced among the highest grain yields over three seasons.

Treatment
VC + NPKe0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of both NPK only and VC + NPK treatments resulted in the highest grain yields over the three cropping seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1508 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RS plus NPK increased short-term rice yield by only 3.52 t ha−1.

Treatment
RS + NPKe0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3.52 t ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RS + NPK resulted in little increase (3.52 t ha−1) in rice yield over the short term.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1682 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest short-term soil carbon changes depend primarily on organic manure type.

Treatment
type of organic manuree0
Outcome
short-term changes of soil carbon fractions and carbon sequestratione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the short-term changes of soil carbon fractions and carbon sequestration primarily depend on the type of organic manure used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1722–1847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose that vermicompost, FYM and GL provide labile carbon that can improve short-term rice yield.

Treatment
Vermicompost, FYM and GLe0
Compound
labile carbone0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
improvee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vermicompost, FYM and GL provide more labile carbon, which can improve rice yield over the short term.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1848–1950 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: biology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

99 papers: 88 positive, 11 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

219 papers: 199 positive, 20 negative or no effect

198 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

215 papers more in this group

See all 219 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

305 papers: 280 positive, 25 negative or no effect

279 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

301 papers more in this group

See all 305 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.