Paper · 2017 · Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Fine Root Growth Response to Soil-Applied Nitrogen and Paclobutrazol

Gary Watson; Angela Hewitt

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Practices to promote tree root growth have been sought in arboriculture for many years, especially as a treatment for trees that are stressed or in decline. Tree fertilization is a common practice in arboriculture. A few research reports have shown that nitrogen fertilization can increase fine-root density in localized areas of soil where the fertilizer has been applied, but the effect on the whole root system has not been investigated. Research has reported fine-root stimulating effects from basal application of the growth regulator paclobutrazol, but results have not been consistent. More information is needed. A slow-release granular formulation of nitrogen was broadcast over the entire root system of mature oaks for four consecutive years, with or without a paclobutrazol basal drench in the first year. Nitrogen was also applied to younger green ash and black maple as granular broadcast or subsoil liquid soil injection for two consecutive years. There was no overall increase in fine-root development from any of the treatments, and no localized increase from soil injection application of nitrogen. Growth response of the crowns was minimal. Soil profiles were undisturbed with moderate natural nitrogen availability. The results suggest that routine fertilization of trees at standard recommended rates may be ineffective if soil fertility is moderate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-applied slow-release nitrogen produced no overall increase in fine-root development of mature oaks.

Taxon
mature oakse1
Treatment
A slow-release granular formulation of nitrogene1
Outcome
fine-root developmente2
Direction
no overall increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“A slow-release granular formulation of nitrogen was broadcast over the entire root system of mature oaks for four consecutive years, with or without a paclobutrazol basal drench in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–816 · show in text ↑
e2

“There was no overall increase in fine-root development from any of the treatments, and no localized increase from soil injection application of nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paclobutrazol basal drench produced no overall increase in fine-root development of mature oaks.

Taxon
mature oakse1
Treatment
paclobutrazol basal drenche1
Outcome
fine-root developmente2
Direction
no overall increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“A slow-release granular formulation of nitrogen was broadcast over the entire root system of mature oaks for four consecutive years, with or without a paclobutrazol basal drench in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–816 · show in text ↑
e2

“There was no overall increase in fine-root development from any of the treatments, and no localized increase from soil injection application of nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoil liquid soil injection of nitrogen produced no localized increase in fine-root development of green ash and black maple.

Treatment
soil injection application of nitrogene2
Outcome
fine-root developmente2
Direction
no localized increasee2
Qualifier
localizede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus pennsylvanica · TaxonJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Acer saccharum subsp. nigrum
Acer saccharum subsp. nigrum · TaxonDaderot · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“There was no overall increase in fine-root development from any of the treatments, and no localized increase from soil injection application of nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1115 · show in text ↑
e3

“Nitrogen was also applied to younger green ash and black maple as granular broadcast or subsoil liquid soil injection for two consecutive years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–961 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth response of the crowns of trees was minimal.

Taxon
treese5
Outcome
Growth response of the crownse3
Qualifier
minimale3

Verbatim

e3

“Growth response of the crowns was minimal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1158 · show in text ↑
e5

“The results suggest that routine fertilization of trees at standard recommended rates may be ineffective if soil fertility is moderate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1370 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Routine fertilization of trees at standard recommended rates may be ineffective if soil fertility is moderate.

Taxon
treese5
Outcome
routine fertilization of trees at standard recommended ratese5
Qualifier
if soil fertility is moderatee5

Verbatim

e5

“The results suggest that routine fertilization of trees at standard recommended rates may be ineffective if soil fertility is moderate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1370 · show in text ↑

application · growth · QuercusPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · growth · Fraxinus pennsylvanica (green ash)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · growth · Acer saccharum (sugar maple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Acer saccharum (sugar maple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · growth · QuercusPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.