Paper · 2018 · Americanae (AECID Library)

Physiological and production responses of olive (Olea europaea L.) cv. Frantoio under regulated deficit irrigation on a semiarid mediterranean weather condition (Cholqui, Maipo Valley, Chile)

Kremer, Cristian; Reyes, Luis; Fichet, Thomas; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to determine the Regulated Deficit Irrigation (RDI) effect on the cv. Frantoio olive tree, under semiarid mediterranean weather condtions (8 months dry period). The trial was established in the “El Oliveto" farm (33°48' S, 71°05' W) Cholqui, Melipilla, Metropolitan Region, Chile, and considered five irrigation treatments: 100% of crop evapotranspiration (ETc) (T1), 85% ETc (T2), 75% ETc (T3), 70% ETc (T4), and 65% ETc (T5) applied between February (endocarp lignification) to May (harvest) of 2011. Periodic plant measurements were conducted, which included physiological parameters (midday stem water potential, photosynthesis and stomatal conductance) and production indices (mean fruit weight, maturity index and total production). The results obtained indicate that to a less irrigation water, the water potential, the stomatal conductance and the photosynthesis are decreased when compared to the 100% ETc. As others have quoted, it was also noticed that the less irrigation water had no effect on yield and fruit oil content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Less irrigation decreased olive midday stem water potential versus 100% ETc.

Material
cv. Frantoioe0t0
Treatment
less irrigation watere0
Outcome
water potentiale0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
100% ETce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results obtained indicate that to a less irrigation water, the water potential, the stomatal conductance and the photosynthesis are decreased when compared to the 100% ETc.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive (Olea europaea L.) cv. Frantoio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Less irrigation decreased olive stomatal conductance versus 100% ETc.

Treatment
less irrigation watere0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
100% ETce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results obtained indicate that to a less irrigation water, the water potential, the stomatal conductance and the photosynthesis are decreased when compared to the 100% ETc.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive (Olea europaea L.) cv. Frantoio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Less irrigation decreased olive photosynthesis versus 100% ETc.

Treatment
less irrigation watere0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
100% ETce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results obtained indicate that to a less irrigation water, the water potential, the stomatal conductance and the photosynthesis are decreased when compared to the 100% ETc.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive (Olea europaea L.) cv. Frantoio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Less irrigation had no reported effect on olive yield.

Treatment
less irrigation watere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the less irrigation water had no effect on yield and fruit oil content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive (Olea europaea L.) cv. Frantoio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Less irrigation had no reported effect on olive fruit oil content.

Treatment
less irrigation watere0
Outcome
fruit oil contente0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the less irrigation water had no effect on yield and fruit oil content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive (Olea europaea L.) cv. Frantoio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–79 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Olea europaea (common olive)Results differ

53 papers: 26 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

irrigation · physiology: gas exchange · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 1 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 9 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

irrigation · quality: oil · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 15 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.