Paper · 2021 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

The effect of selenium on salinity stress and selenate – sulfate comparision in kale

Zeliha Kucukyumuk; Donald L. Suarez

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Increased salinity is a threat to arid and semiarid zone agriculture worldwide. Kale consumption has increased as its nutritional and antioxidant benefits become more widely known. Compared with other vegetables, it is relatively salt tolerant. However, there is limited information on its salt tolerance, nutrient uptake under saline conditions, and physiological response. We examined the yield response, physiological parameters, and mineral nutrient content of kale grown under variable conditions of salt and Se addition in a greenhouse study. The experiment consisted of four salinity levels, four Se levels, and combined salinity treatments for a total of 16 treatments each with four replications. Salinity decreased yield when irrigated at 6 and 9 dS m−1 but not at 3 dS m−1. Selenium addition increased yield at all salinity levels but did not increase salt tolerance. Addition of 0.25 mg Se per kg of soil, corresponding to leaf Se concentrations of 1 mg kg−1, was sufficient to increase yield by an average of 11% relative to control. Kale yield loss began between 3 and 6 dS m−1 irrigation water salinity and 50% yield loss occurred at EC 6.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity of 6 and 9 dS m−1 decreased kale yield.

Treatment
6 and 9 dS m−1e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
greenhousee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity decreased yield when irrigated at 6 and 9 dS m−1 but not at 3 dS m−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–783 · show in text ↑
e1

“kale grown under variable conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–501 · show in text ↑
e2

“greenhouse study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–547 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 3 dS m−1, salinity did not decrease kale yield.

Treatment
3 dS m−1e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
not ate0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity decreased yield when irrigated at 6 and 9 dS m−1 but not at 3 dS m−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–783 · show in text ↑
e1

“kale grown under variable conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–501 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium addition increased kale yield at all salinity levels.

Treatment
Selenium additione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at all salinity levelse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Selenium addition increased yield at all salinity levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–841 · show in text ↑
e1

“kale grown under variable conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–501 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium addition did not increase kale salt tolerance.

Treatment
Selenium additione0
Outcome
salt tolerancee0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Selenium addition increased yield at all salinity levels but did not increase salt tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–877 · show in text ↑
e1

“kale grown under variable conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–501 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 0.25 mg Se per kg of soil increased kale yield by an average of 11% relative to control.

Treatment
0.25 mg Se per kg of soile0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
11%e0
Qualifier
leaf Se concentrations of 1 mg kg−1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of 0.25 mg Se per kg of soil, corresponding to leaf Se concentrations of 1 mg kg−1, was sufficient to increase yield by an average of 11% relative to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1045 · show in text ↑
e1

“kale grown under variable conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–501 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kale yield loss began between 3 and 6 dS m−1 irrigation water salinity.

Outcome
yield losse0
Value
between 3 and 6 dS m−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kale yield loss began between 3 and 6 dS m−1 irrigation water salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kale had 50% yield loss at EC 6.

Outcome
yield losse0
Value
50%e0
Qualifier
EC 6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% yield loss occurred at EC 6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1153 · show in text ↑
e1

“Kale yield loss began”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1068 · show in text ↑

selenium atom · tolerance: abiotic · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

selenium atom · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.